RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by Measuring Glycated Hemoglobin Can Reduce the Use of the Glucose Challenge Test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106405219

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Physiological changes during pregnancy, such as dilutional anemia and a reduced half-life of red blood cells, have prevented the use of glycated Hb (HbA1c) as a biomarker for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Nevertheless, increasing ev...

      Background: Physiological changes during pregnancy, such as dilutional anemia and a reduced half-life of red blood cells, have prevented the use of glycated Hb (HbA1c) as a biomarker for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Nevertheless, increasing evidence supports the use of HbA1c in GDM diagnostic strategies.We studied HbA1c as a biomarker of GDM and its possible use as a screening test to avoid the use of the glucose challenge test (GCT).
      Methods: This case-control study involved 607 pregnant women between the 24th and 28th week of gestation. HbA1c level was determined, and GDM was diagnosed according to the National Diabetes Data Group criteria. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was determined; two low and two high cut-off points were established to rule out GDM and classify high-risk pregnant women, respectively. For each cut-off, sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), and total number and percentage of GCTs avoided were determined.
      Results: The AUC for HbA1c diagnostic performance was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57–0.79). Using 4.6% HbA1c (27 mmol/mol) as the lower cut-off (S=100%), 14% of participants could avoid the GCT. Using 5.5% HbA1c (36 mmol/mol) as the upper cut-off (SP =94.5%), 6% of participants would be considered at high risk.
      Conclusions: HbA1c can be used as a screening test prior to the GCT, thereby reducing the need for the GCT among pregnant women at a low risk of GDM.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 WHO, "Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation" 1-25, 2011

      2 Ye M, "The utility of HbA1c for screening gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes" 114 : 43-49, 2016

      3 Donovan L, "Screening tests for gestational diabetes : a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force" 159 : 115-122, 2013

      4 Benhalima K, "Screening for gestational diabetes in Europe : where do we stand and how to move forward : A scientific paper commissioned by the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology(EBCOG)" 201 : 192-196, 2016

      5 Bonongwe P, "Reproducibility of a 75G oral glucose tolerance test in pregnant women" 43 : 333-338, 2015

      6 Aceituno Velasco L, "Procesoasistencialintegradoembarazo, parto y puerperio" 3 : 1-73, 2014

      7 Committee on Practice Bulletins - Obstetrics, "Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus" 122 : 406-416, 2013

      8 "Plan integral de diabetes en Andalucía. Análisissituación 2013"

      9 American Diabetes Association, "Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes - 2019" 42 (42): S165-S172, 2019

      10 International Expert Committee, "International expert committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes" 32 : 1327-1334, 2009

      1 WHO, "Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation" 1-25, 2011

      2 Ye M, "The utility of HbA1c for screening gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes" 114 : 43-49, 2016

      3 Donovan L, "Screening tests for gestational diabetes : a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force" 159 : 115-122, 2013

      4 Benhalima K, "Screening for gestational diabetes in Europe : where do we stand and how to move forward : A scientific paper commissioned by the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology(EBCOG)" 201 : 192-196, 2016

      5 Bonongwe P, "Reproducibility of a 75G oral glucose tolerance test in pregnant women" 43 : 333-338, 2015

      6 Aceituno Velasco L, "Procesoasistencialintegradoembarazo, parto y puerperio" 3 : 1-73, 2014

      7 Committee on Practice Bulletins - Obstetrics, "Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus" 122 : 406-416, 2013

      8 "Plan integral de diabetes en Andalucía. Análisissituación 2013"

      9 American Diabetes Association, "Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes - 2019" 42 (42): S165-S172, 2019

      10 International Expert Committee, "International expert committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes" 32 : 1327-1334, 2009

      11 International Association of Diabetes, "International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy" 33 : 676-682, 2010

      12 Lowe LP, "Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome(HAPO)Study : associations of maternal A1C and glucose with pregnancy outcomes" 35 : 574-580, 2012

      13 HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, "Hyperglycemia and adverse pegnancyoutcomes" 358 : 1991-2002, 2008

      14 Renz PB, "HbA1c test as a tool in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus" 10 : e0135989-, 2015

      15 Kwon SS, "HbA1c for diagnosis and prognosis of gestational diabetes mellitus" 110 : 38-43, 2015

      16 Khalafallah A, "Glycosylated haemoglobin for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus" 6 : e011059-, 2016

      17 Agarwal MM, "Gestational diabetes screening of a multiethnic, high-risk population using glycated proteins" 51 : 67-73, 2001

      18 Maesa JM, "Evaluation of Bio-Rad D-100 HbA1c analyzer against Tosoh G8 and Menarini HA-8180V" 5 : 57-64, 2016

      19 Wolfenbuttel BH, "Ethnic differences in glycemic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes" 36 : 2931-2936, 2013

      20 Farrar D, "Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health" 1 : CD007122-, 2015

      21 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, "Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period"

      22 Carpenter MW, "Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes" 144 : 768-773, 1982

      23 National Diabetes Data Group, "Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance" 28 : 1039-1057, 1979

      24 GrupoEspañol Diabetes y Embarazo, "Asistencia a la gestante con diabetes. Guía de prácticaclínicaactualizadaen 2014" 31 : 45-59, 2015

      25 Maesa JM, "Application of six sigma model to evaluate the analytical quality of four HbA1c analyzers" 63 : 79-83, 2017

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-05-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine -> Annals of Laboratory Medicine
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine -> Annals of Laboratory Medicine
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재
      2010-06-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한진단검사의학회지 -> The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.51 0.18 1.15
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.91 0.81 0.458 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼