2012년 검정 『중학교 역사 ②』 교과서의 비교 분석 -‘대한민국의 발전’ 단원을 중심으로- = The Comparative Analysis of Nine “Middle School History ②” Textbooks by 2012’s Official Approval

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study intends to analyse comparatively the forms and the contents of nine “Middle School History ②” textbooks by 2012’s official approval, and to suggest implications for the 2019’s production and 2020’s official approval of “Middle School History”. To achieve the purpose of this study, I surveyed many previous articles and analysed comparatively the forms and the contents of nine “Middle School History ②” textbooks by 2012’s official approval.
The suggestions of this study are as follows.
Firstly, it is necessary to pass all “Middle School History” textbooks in official approval inspection, unless they cannot be used as history text books in middle schools.
Secondly, it is necessary to product a great variety of “Middle School History” textbooks in the forms and the contents of textbooks. For example, textbook rich in narrative contents, textbook rich in large and interesting pictures, textbook rich in inquiry activities and reading materials, etc. Thirdly, it is necessary to increase the textbook’s pages in order to insert more contents, pictures, maps, graphs than the textbooks now in use.
Lastly, it is necessary to regard official approval inspection as improvement of textbooks instead of dropping of textbooks.