RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      pūrvācārya(先代 軌範師) 再考 = Pūrvācārya Revisited

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104152153

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As suggested in the title, this thesis aimed to critically
      examine Hakamaya Noriaki’s Pūrvācārya kō(考)(Indogaku
      Bukkyōgaku kenkyū 34-2), but was really written as a part
      of the criticism of the discussion developed by Harada Wasō
      that was adopting it as one of the primary grounds for his
      own hypothesis about the origin of Sautrāntika(“in fact it is
      a fictitious sect as Yogācāra”).
      Hakamaya said that his thesis was but a working
      hypothesis for confirming the assumption that “pūrvācārya
      on Abhidharmakośabhāsya belongs to Yogācāra.”
      Furthermore, he was only interested in the traces on
      Yogācāra literature, and did not consider its ideal origin or
      relevance. In the opinion of the writer, his thesis raised a
      question significantly, but did not present any grounds for
      settling that all pūrvācāryas in 11 places were the masters
      of Yogācāra, or Asanga. Pūrvācārya can be the master who
      has succeeded to teaching or can be a general name. The
      same is also applied to ācārya.
      However, it is difficult to conclude that a master's doctrine
      belongs to Yogācāra even though it is traced in the Yogācārabhūmi
      . It is because Sthavira Śrīlāta also asserted a
      similar doctrine to it.
      It is, therefore, a mere conjecture or delusion(?) to
      literally trace the pūrvācāryas and specify that they belong
      to Yogācāra. Also, it is nothing but taking the dogmatic
      attitude to say based on the thesis that “the fact that
      pūrvācārya belongs to Yogācāra has become a generally
      accepted idea in the academic circles”.
      번역하기

      As suggested in the title, this thesis aimed to critically examine Hakamaya Noriaki’s Pūrvācārya kō(考)(Indogaku Bukkyōgaku kenkyū 34-2), but was really written as a part of the criticism of the discussion developed by Harada Wasō that was a...

      As suggested in the title, this thesis aimed to critically
      examine Hakamaya Noriaki’s Pūrvācārya kō(考)(Indogaku
      Bukkyōgaku kenkyū 34-2), but was really written as a part
      of the criticism of the discussion developed by Harada Wasō
      that was adopting it as one of the primary grounds for his
      own hypothesis about the origin of Sautrāntika(“in fact it is
      a fictitious sect as Yogācāra”).
      Hakamaya said that his thesis was but a working
      hypothesis for confirming the assumption that “pūrvācārya
      on Abhidharmakośabhāsya belongs to Yogācāra.”
      Furthermore, he was only interested in the traces on
      Yogācāra literature, and did not consider its ideal origin or
      relevance. In the opinion of the writer, his thesis raised a
      question significantly, but did not present any grounds for
      settling that all pūrvācāryas in 11 places were the masters
      of Yogācāra, or Asanga. Pūrvācārya can be the master who
      has succeeded to teaching or can be a general name. The
      same is also applied to ācārya.
      However, it is difficult to conclude that a master's doctrine
      belongs to Yogācāra even though it is traced in the Yogācārabhūmi
      . It is because Sthavira Śrīlāta also asserted a
      similar doctrine to it.
      It is, therefore, a mere conjecture or delusion(?) to
      literally trace the pūrvācāryas and specify that they belong
      to Yogācāra. Also, it is nothing but taking the dogmatic
      attitude to say based on the thesis that “the fact that
      pūrvācārya belongs to Yogācāra has become a generally
      accepted idea in the academic circles”.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "졸고"

      2 안성두, "서평: Robert Kritzer, Vasubandhu and the Yog?c?rabh?mi. Yog?c?ra Elements in the Abhidharma ko?abh??ya,『( 불교학리뷰』창간호" 금강대학교 불교문화연구원 76-, 2006

      3 졸고, "경주 세친과 상좌 슈리라타" 72-,

      4 平川彰, "阿毘達磨俱舍論索引 PART ONE" 26-,

      5 平川彰, "阿毘達磨俱舍論索引 (PART ONE SANSKRIT-TIBETAN-CHINESE)" 239-,

      6 졸고, "衆賢과 世親" 49 :

      7 兵藤一夫, "經量部師としてのヤソョ-ミトラ, ( 初期佛敎からアビダルマへ" 平樂寺書店 331-, 2002

      8 加藤純章, "經量部の硏究" 261-,

      9 權五民, "經主 世親과 上座 슈리라타(rlta)" 한국불교학회 46 (46): 43-78, 2006

      10 彼說, "此依有根身起" 以有根身與心展轉爲種子故

      1 "졸고"

      2 안성두, "서평: Robert Kritzer, Vasubandhu and the Yog?c?rabh?mi. Yog?c?ra Elements in the Abhidharma ko?abh??ya,『( 불교학리뷰』창간호" 금강대학교 불교문화연구원 76-, 2006

      3 졸고, "경주 세친과 상좌 슈리라타" 72-,

      4 平川彰, "阿毘達磨俱舍論索引 PART ONE" 26-,

      5 平川彰, "阿毘達磨俱舍論索引 (PART ONE SANSKRIT-TIBETAN-CHINESE)" 239-,

      6 졸고, "衆賢과 世親" 49 :

      7 兵藤一夫, "經量部師としてのヤソョ-ミトラ, ( 初期佛敎からアビダルマへ" 平樂寺書店 331-, 2002

      8 加藤純章, "經量部の硏究" 261-,

      9 權五民, "經主 世親과 上座 슈리라타(rlta)" 한국불교학회 46 (46): 43-78, 2006

      10 彼說, "此依有根身起" 以有根身與心展轉爲種子故

      11 舟橋一哉, "業の硏究" 法藏館 224-, 1981

      12 福田琢, "書評, 加藤純章 著『 經量部の硏究』」" 大谷大學 50 : 1989

      13 山口益, "俱舍論の原典解明" 法藏館 219-, 1987

      14 정승석, "佛典解說辭典" 민족사 44-, 1989

      15 졸고, "上座 슈리라타와 經部毘婆沙" 보조사상 30 : 2008

      16 三枝充悳, "インド佛敎人名辭典" 法藏館 261-, 1986

      17 "『구사론』권28『대정장』29, 146b2-3"

      18 "『 유가사지론』권58『( 대정장』30, 621b7-10; 622a26-28)"

      19 "『 순정리론』권25『( 대정장』29, 483a9-10; 18-19)"

      20 "『 순정리론』권25『( 대정장』29, 483a7-9), “經主述自軌範師釋二句義, 顯己仁孝. 彼雖有失而不彰顯, 師資之道, 理固應然.”"

      21 "『 순정리론』권13『( 대정장』29, 403c24-p.404a3)"

      22 "『 대비바사론』권77『( 대정장』27, 399c22-23), “評曰. 應作是說. 四諦皆有世俗勝義.”"

      23 "『 대비바사론』권22『( 대정장』27, 113a2-4; a11-23)"

      24 "『 구사론』권9『( 대정장』29, 51a6-8)"

      25 原田和宗, "〈經量部の ‘單層の’識の流れ〉という槪念への疑問" 1 : 138-161, 1996

      26 "WISDOM, COMPASSION, AND THE SEARCH FOR UNDERSTANDING" Univ. of Hawaii Press 265-314, 2000

      27 松田和信, "Vy?khy?yuktiの二諦說"

      28 R. Kritzer, "Rebirth and Causation in the Yog?c?ra Abhidharma" 280-, 1999

      29 山部能宜, "P?rv?c?ryaの一用例について" (45) : 1999

      30 袴谷憲昭, "P?rv?c?rya 考"

      31 이상은, "P?rv?c?rya 考" 95-100, 1986

      32 이상은, "Dign?gaのHastav?laprakara?a&V?tti-和譯とSkt.還元譯の試み" 108-, 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association of Buddhist Studies -> Korean Association of Buddhist Studies
      2019-06-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Buddhist Studies -> Korea Association of Buddhist Studies
      2019-06-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : BUL GYO HAK YEONGU-Journal of Buddhist Studies -> Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.47 0.937 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼