RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      승가화합의 판단 기준에 관하여 = On the Criterion for Judgement on the Samgha's Harmony

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104152159

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to consider the criterion
      for judgement on the samha’s harmony focused on the
      definition of harmony in the Pāli Vinay a. The prior studies
      have discussed about this subject, in those researches,
      however, it has generally been understood that the ‘common
      execution’ of kamma practiced in sammukhībhūta -
      samgha (現前僧伽), seeming to denote very important
      symbolic of the samgha’s harmony, is the only ritual
      ceremony that all monks in the same boundary must
      participate.
      In this study I would like to suggest the fact that the
      ‘common execution’ of kamma was not only the ritual
      ceremony, but also the ceremony requiring the perfect union
      of mind among the members of samgha by investigating the
      meaning of the samānasamvāsaka in the Pāli Vinaya. That
      is, the samgha’s harmony is truly realized by fulfilling these
      two elements-mind and body.
      We might think that this method for maintenance of the
      samgha’s harmony is very self-righteous. But, On the one
      hand, the samgha achieved firm harmony in the level of
      sammukhībhūta-samgha by samānasamvāsaka; on the
      other, they admitted the existence of nānāsamvāsaka who
      could not possibly compromise with them. I think that this
      stance is very effective for harmony of the whole Buddhist
      samgha.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to consider the criterion for judgement on the samha’s harmony focused on the definition of harmony in the Pāli Vinay a. The prior studies have discussed about this subject, in those researches, however, it has generall...

      The purpose of this study is to consider the criterion
      for judgement on the samha’s harmony focused on the
      definition of harmony in the Pāli Vinay a. The prior studies
      have discussed about this subject, in those researches,
      however, it has generally been understood that the ‘common
      execution’ of kamma practiced in sammukhībhūta -
      samgha (現前僧伽), seeming to denote very important
      symbolic of the samgha’s harmony, is the only ritual
      ceremony that all monks in the same boundary must
      participate.
      In this study I would like to suggest the fact that the
      ‘common execution’ of kamma was not only the ritual
      ceremony, but also the ceremony requiring the perfect union
      of mind among the members of samgha by investigating the
      meaning of the samānasamvāsaka in the Pāli Vinaya. That
      is, the samgha’s harmony is truly realized by fulfilling these
      two elements-mind and body.
      We might think that this method for maintenance of the
      samgha’s harmony is very self-righteous. But, On the one
      hand, the samgha achieved firm harmony in the level of
      sammukhībhūta-samgha by samānasamvāsaka; on the
      other, they admitted the existence of nānāsamvāsaka who
      could not possibly compromise with them. I think that this
      stance is very effective for harmony of the whole Buddhist
      samgha.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "율장에 나타난 ‘不同住 (n?n?sa?v?saka)’에 관하여" 인도철학회 11 (11): 181-200, 2002

      2 "불교학연구" 57-80, 2004

      3 졸고, "惡見 주장자에 대한 불교 승가의 입장(1) -‘惡見違諫戒’와 ‘不捨惡見거죄갈마’를 중심으로-" 대각사상연구회 6 : 197-225, 2003

      4 佐藤密雄, "原始佛敎敎團の硏究" 282-283, 1972

      5 平川彰, "原始佛敎の硏究" 春秋社 295-351, 1964

      6 平川彰, "原始佛敎の硏究" 春秋社 303-, 1964

      7 佐藤密雄, "南專大藏經" 188-, 1938

      8 佐藤密雄, "南專大藏經" 290-, 1936

      9 平川彰, "初期大乘佛敎の硏究" 春秋社 687-689, 1968

      10 佐?木閑, "インド佛敎變移論 -なぜ佛敎は多樣化したのか" 大藏出版社 2007

      1 "율장에 나타난 ‘不同住 (n?n?sa?v?saka)’에 관하여" 인도철학회 11 (11): 181-200, 2002

      2 "불교학연구" 57-80, 2004

      3 졸고, "惡見 주장자에 대한 불교 승가의 입장(1) -‘惡見違諫戒’와 ‘不捨惡見거죄갈마’를 중심으로-" 대각사상연구회 6 : 197-225, 2003

      4 佐藤密雄, "原始佛敎敎團の硏究" 282-283, 1972

      5 平川彰, "原始佛敎の硏究" 春秋社 295-351, 1964

      6 平川彰, "原始佛敎の硏究" 春秋社 303-, 1964

      7 佐藤密雄, "南專大藏經" 188-, 1938

      8 佐藤密雄, "南專大藏經" 290-, 1936

      9 平川彰, "初期大乘佛敎の硏究" 春秋社 687-689, 1968

      10 佐?木閑, "インド佛敎變移論 -なぜ佛敎は多樣化したのか" 大藏出版社 2007

      11 "anuj?n?mi bhikkhave ett?vat? s?magg? y?vat? ek?v?so’ti. Vinⅰ"

      12 P. Kieffer-Pulz, "The S?m?" Dietrich Reimer Verlag 52-54, 1992

      13 P. Olivelle, "The Origin and the Early Development of Buddhist Monachism" Gunasena 38-39, 1974

      14 "The Importance of A?oka’s so-called Schism Edict, Indological and Buddhist Studies, Volume in Honour of Professor J.W.de Jong on his Sixtieth Birthday, 1982, 61-68쪽; 平川彰, 위의 책, 295-351쪽"

      15 H. Bechert, "A?okas ‘Schismenedict’ und der Begriff Sa?ghabheda, Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde Sud-Ostasiens , Ⅴ"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association of Buddhist Studies -> Korean Association of Buddhist Studies
      2019-06-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Buddhist Studies -> Korea Association of Buddhist Studies
      2019-06-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : BUL GYO HAK YEONGU-Journal of Buddhist Studies -> Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.47 0.937 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼