RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국경찰체제의 역사적 특성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76251025

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this dissertation, certain fundamental problems are identified. First, Police organizations are structured so uniformly that they neglect differentials between main office and branches, as well as peculiar differences among units and regions. It seems originated from their pseudo-military organizational features regarding citizens as objects of police control rather than consumers of police service. Under authoritarian regimes, military organizational principles were not only efficient but also effective, since practical goals of police policies were not the provision of pubic service but social control and political stability by coercion. They are too anachronistic to adapt to recent democratic social development. Organizing principles according to historical contingencies should be superceded by ones abiding by fundamental organizational goals. Second, police organizations are so focused on the repressive one that disproportionate development among major police functions is incurred. Partial utilization constrains the general development of police functions including prevention and service. Third, the public image of police as a perpetrator for illegitimate political regimes is so firmly established that authority itself is often affronted not to say deteriorated morale. Past authoritarian leaders usually mobilized police force to meet their political needs without any consideration on the future status of police organization. Securing political neutrality is necessary to free from ill fame in the past and restore public authority.
      To solve problems stated above, this dissertation recommends certain policy prescriptions for the fundamental reform of police organizations. First, Police organizations should be restructured flexibly and responsively to accommodate rapidly changing administrative environment; organizational reform focusing on practical business, enlargement of lower practitioners discretion in the line, decrease of the number of rank and order, simplification of the entering path and procedure into police career and so on. Second, it is needed to activate departments for crime prevention and public service not to say the fulfillment of primary duties and principles. Third, distributive priority should be changed more practically and efficiently. Korean police organizations should be advanced governmental agencies, ultimate goal of which is the production of police service for the citizen and the public welfare.
      번역하기

      In this dissertation, certain fundamental problems are identified. First, Police organizations are structured so uniformly that they neglect differentials between main office and branches, as well as peculiar differences among units and regions. It se...

      In this dissertation, certain fundamental problems are identified. First, Police organizations are structured so uniformly that they neglect differentials between main office and branches, as well as peculiar differences among units and regions. It seems originated from their pseudo-military organizational features regarding citizens as objects of police control rather than consumers of police service. Under authoritarian regimes, military organizational principles were not only efficient but also effective, since practical goals of police policies were not the provision of pubic service but social control and political stability by coercion. They are too anachronistic to adapt to recent democratic social development. Organizing principles according to historical contingencies should be superceded by ones abiding by fundamental organizational goals. Second, police organizations are so focused on the repressive one that disproportionate development among major police functions is incurred. Partial utilization constrains the general development of police functions including prevention and service. Third, the public image of police as a perpetrator for illegitimate political regimes is so firmly established that authority itself is often affronted not to say deteriorated morale. Past authoritarian leaders usually mobilized police force to meet their political needs without any consideration on the future status of police organization. Securing political neutrality is necessary to free from ill fame in the past and restore public authority.
      To solve problems stated above, this dissertation recommends certain policy prescriptions for the fundamental reform of police organizations. First, Police organizations should be restructured flexibly and responsively to accommodate rapidly changing administrative environment; organizational reform focusing on practical business, enlargement of lower practitioners discretion in the line, decrease of the number of rank and order, simplification of the entering path and procedure into police career and so on. Second, it is needed to activate departments for crime prevention and public service not to say the fulfillment of primary duties and principles. Third, distributive priority should be changed more practically and efficiently. Korean police organizations should be advanced governmental agencies, ultimate goal of which is the production of police service for the citizen and the public welfare.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 경찰조직의 일반적 특성
      • Ⅲ. 한국경찰체제의 역사적 특성
      • Ⅳ. 정책적 제언
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 경찰조직의 일반적 특성
      • Ⅲ. 한국경찰체제의 역사적 특성
      • Ⅳ. 정책적 제언
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "한국행정조직론" 법문사 1997.

      2 "한국행정의 역사적 분석 1968-1984" 서울대학교 출판부 1987.

      3 "한국경찰의 발자취" 1989.

      4 "정보 및 조직이론적 측면에서 본 검찰과 경찰과의 관계" 1990.

      5 "자치경찰제의 도입과 경찰의 수사권 독립" 2000.

      6 "리차드 H. 홀 저" 서울 대영문화사 1986.

      7 "공인조사(공인탐정)제도의 도입에 관한 연구" 2005.

      8 "The Social Psychology of Organizations" John Wiley 1966.

      9 "The Changing Role of the Police Assessing the Current Transition to Community Policing" 1998.

      10 "Staff/Line Distinctions in Job and Organizational Commitment Journal of Occupational Psychology"

      1 "한국행정조직론" 법문사 1997.

      2 "한국행정의 역사적 분석 1968-1984" 서울대학교 출판부 1987.

      3 "한국경찰의 발자취" 1989.

      4 "정보 및 조직이론적 측면에서 본 검찰과 경찰과의 관계" 1990.

      5 "자치경찰제의 도입과 경찰의 수사권 독립" 2000.

      6 "리차드 H. 홀 저" 서울 대영문화사 1986.

      7 "공인조사(공인탐정)제도의 도입에 관한 연구" 2005.

      8 "The Social Psychology of Organizations" John Wiley 1966.

      9 "The Changing Role of the Police Assessing the Current Transition to Community Policing" 1998.

      10 "Staff/Line Distinctions in Job and Organizational Commitment Journal of Occupational Psychology"

      11 "Police in Community Relations" Brown & Benchmark Publishers 1996.

      12 "Police For The Future" New York Oxford university Press 1994.

      13 "Jack, Police Management" Roxbury Publishing Company 1997.

      14 "Dimentions of Organizational Structure"

      15 "Control in the Police Organization The MIT Press" (rdholt) : 1983.

      16 "70년대 한국경찰의 발전 방향" 내무부 치안행정기획단 1972.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-09-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Law Review -> Law Review KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-07-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Law Review -> Korean Law Review KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 法學硏究 -> 법학연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 1.05
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.07 1.02 1.083 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼