RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      醫療行爲와 患者의 自己決定權 = Patient's Right of Self-Determination in Medical Treatment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75005903

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Medical Treatment is considered as one of the most important field in the natural science, that deals with most cherished values, life and health. In modern society, medical science achieved great advance due to the astonishing of natural science.
      On the other hand, we face more danger in medical care, because doctors should adopt more technical surgery medicine with side effect, and complicated instrument. Medical care is justified in criminal law as professional activity.
      The viewpoint of modern and technological new era about the value of man's life has been in the state of uncertainty. Some may feel a life without human dignity or with only painful malady is a life have no reason to sustain.
      Is it possible to develop policies that control the civil and public medical sector related bio-ethics by the means of the Criminal Law? If it is possible, considering the ultima-ratio principle (the application of a criminal law is acceptable when a legal procedure is the last possible means), can it exercise jurisdiction over all kind of med-criminal case? Or, regardless of its jurisdiction, have we just leave it as it is and wait hoping some kind of amicable settlement.
      The study is about the legal relation between medical professionals and patients, especially, conflict and legal control of human digninity and self-determination right (Selbstbestimmungsrecht). And it has more about the Auflka¨lungspflicht(an obligation of medical professionals to let patient know his condition).
      번역하기

      Medical Treatment is considered as one of the most important field in the natural science, that deals with most cherished values, life and health. In modern society, medical science achieved great advance due to the astonishing of natural science. On...

      Medical Treatment is considered as one of the most important field in the natural science, that deals with most cherished values, life and health. In modern society, medical science achieved great advance due to the astonishing of natural science.
      On the other hand, we face more danger in medical care, because doctors should adopt more technical surgery medicine with side effect, and complicated instrument. Medical care is justified in criminal law as professional activity.
      The viewpoint of modern and technological new era about the value of man's life has been in the state of uncertainty. Some may feel a life without human dignity or with only painful malady is a life have no reason to sustain.
      Is it possible to develop policies that control the civil and public medical sector related bio-ethics by the means of the Criminal Law? If it is possible, considering the ultima-ratio principle (the application of a criminal law is acceptable when a legal procedure is the last possible means), can it exercise jurisdiction over all kind of med-criminal case? Or, regardless of its jurisdiction, have we just leave it as it is and wait hoping some kind of amicable settlement.
      The study is about the legal relation between medical professionals and patients, especially, conflict and legal control of human digninity and self-determination right (Selbstbestimmungsrecht). And it has more about the Auflka¨lungspflicht(an obligation of medical professionals to let patient know his condition).

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Abstract = 551
      • Ⅰ. 序 論 = 551
      • 1. 硏究의 目的 = 551
      • 2. 연구의 범위와 내용 = 552
      • 목차
      • Abstract = 551
      • Ⅰ. 序 論 = 551
      • 1. 硏究의 目的 = 551
      • 2. 연구의 범위와 내용 = 552
      • Ⅱ. 의사의 설명의무 = 553
      • 1. 의사의 설명의무의 의의와 기능 = 553
      • 2. 설명의무위반 이론의 연혁 = 553
      • 3. 설명의무의 실정법적 근거 = 555
      • 4. 설명의무의 유형 = 556
      • 5. 說明義務의 內容과 그 制限 = 556
      • Ⅲ. 설명의무를 전제한 患者의 自己決定權 = 559
      • 1. 自己決定權의 意義 = 559
      • 2. 自己決定權의 基本原理 = 559
      • Ⅳ. 生命에 대한 自己決定權과 醫師의 生命維持義務 = 560
      • 1. 序說 = 560
      • 2. 生命에 대한 自己決定權 = 560
      • 3. 自己決定權과 醫師의 生命維持義務와의 關係 = 563
      • Ⅴ. 結論 = 565
      • 참고문헌 = 566
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼