RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Enabling Leverage by Building Alliances between Sport Management and Recreation Management

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106100478

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Recent debates regarding the academic relationship between sport management and recreation management have concluded that sport management does not integrate well with recreation management, and vice versa. The conclusion derives from narrow concerns ...

      Recent debates regarding the academic relationship between sport management and recreation management have concluded that sport management does not integrate well with recreation management, and vice versa. The conclusion derives from narrow concerns with protection of academic turf, rather than the development of a vibrant community of scholarly research and discourse. Recreation management and sport management have developed an array of complementary realms of inquiry that remain inadequately informed by one another because the two have remained largely separated in the academic community. In fact, the two disciplines share a common handicap which derives from the poor status associated with the study of play. However, their shared focus on play is potentially a source of advantage as play (and playfulness) can be used as tools for policy intervention. In particular, there are opportunities for enhanced policy impact in health, economic development, social development, and environmental stewardship. There are consequent opportunities for research funding. However, neither sport nor recreation have attained the degree of impact or funding their potential warrants, particularly because the two have remained separated from one another. Indeed, the separation of sport from recreation has led to strategic failures of policy, for example in the creation of sport tourism policies. In particular, the capacity to cross-leverage sport and recreation needs to be better understood, as there are clear psychographic connections that are inadequately understood and therefore inadequately applied. For example, we have so far failed to understand how sport participation and sport spectating might be leveraged to enhance the development of markets for both. In order to overcome the challenges of working together, we will need to develop a vision for shared research agendas and curricular complementarities. The direction and means for so doing are described.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Weed, M, "Why the two won’t tango! Explaining the lack of integrated policies for sport and tourism in the UK" 17 : 258-283, 2003

      2 Chalip, L, "Towards social leverage of sport events" 11 : 109-127, 2006

      3 Gusfield, J, "The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order" Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1981

      4 Chalip, L., "Sport event tourism and the destination brand: Towards a general theory" 8 : 218-237, 2005

      5 Dustin, D., "Consider the Kirtland’s Warbler" 23 : 1-8, 2008

      6 Blount, B, "Anthropological linguistics, Culture and language use" Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing 29-40, 2009

      1 Weed, M, "Why the two won’t tango! Explaining the lack of integrated policies for sport and tourism in the UK" 17 : 258-283, 2003

      2 Chalip, L, "Towards social leverage of sport events" 11 : 109-127, 2006

      3 Gusfield, J, "The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order" Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1981

      4 Chalip, L., "Sport event tourism and the destination brand: Towards a general theory" 8 : 218-237, 2005

      5 Dustin, D., "Consider the Kirtland’s Warbler" 23 : 1-8, 2008

      6 Blount, B, "Anthropological linguistics, Culture and language use" Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing 29-40, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-02-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : korean Journal of Lesure, Recreation & Park -> Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-12-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : korean Journal of lesure & recreation -> korean Journal of Lesure, Recreation & Park KCI등재
      2015-12-03 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society Of Leisure & Recreation -> Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-07-18 학술지명변경 외국어명 : korean society of lesure & recreation -> korean Journal of lesure & recreation KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-06-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.63 1.63 1.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.79 1.91 1.629 0.39
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼