개정 제조물책임법(2017년)의 의의와 한계

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Product Liability Act has recently been amended and will be enforced on April 19, 2018. This amendment is based on the issue of consumer safety such as humidifier disinfection case and Volkswagen emission gas manipulation case which became a serious problem in our society in 2016. It contains following three points. That is, ① introduction of punitive damages system for malicious illegal act of the manufacturer, ② relaxation of the consumer s burden of proving the defect of the product and causality and ③ strengthening the liability of the product supplier such as the seller. In this paper, I examined the process of the parliamentary debate on the amendment bill, analyzed its content, and reviewed its implications and limitations. In conclusion, ① the requirement of punitive damages under the revised law is strict (intentional inevitability of necessary measures) and there is no consideration in relieving burden of proof of the requirement. ② Considering that there is a limit to the burden of proof by information bias on the mitigation for burden of proof in the amendment law, ultimately it is necessary to supplement the information submission order system(Korean Discovery System) or to relax the requirements of the amendment law. Finally, ③ even if the supplier s liability is strengthened, the supplier will notify the consumer of the identity of the manufacturer and the supplier will be not take responsibility. So legislative improvement is needed to recognize the supplier as the subject of product liability when the manufacturer can not bear product liability. The amendment realized within 15 years after the legislation should be evaluated only by the symbolic significance of the three revised points, but it should be noted that due to its ‘limitation’ it may be remain in the unsubstantial revision which is far from the relief of consumer’s damages. So, first of all, more flexible interpretation of the law should be applied so that the significance of the revised law is not misunderstood.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박동진, "피해자의 효율적 구제를 위한 제조물책임법의 증명책임구조의 검토" 2016

2 서희석, "집단적 소비자피해의 구제를 위한 법제정비의 과제-가습기살균제사건을 계기로" (13) : 2016

3 하종선, "제조물책임소송의 현황과 과제" (68) : 2002

4 한국소비자보호원, "제조물책임법 해설 및 사례"

5 박동진, "제조물책임법 개정시안의 중요내용" 한국비교사법학회 20 (20): 553-598, 2013

6 박경재, "제조물의 결함과 입증책임" 법학연구소 48 (48): 153-185, 2008