RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      宋代景德鎮青白瓷和高麗青瓷茶具造型比較研究 = A Comparative Study on the Tea Set Shapes of Jingdezhen Bluish-white Ware in Song Dynasty and the Celadon Ware in Goryeo

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107830431

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Song Dynasty(960-1279) and Goryeo Dynasty(918-1392), actually the same periods from the perspective of timeline, are important historical periods of China and South Korea respectively. Tea set is a kind of living utensils accompanied by the tea cultur...

      Song Dynasty(960-1279) and Goryeo Dynasty(918-1392), actually the same periods from the perspective of timeline, are important historical periods of China and South Korea respectively. Tea set is a kind of living utensils accompanied by the tea culture. The tea set production of Jingdezhen bluish-white ware in Song Dynasty and celadon ware in Goryeo has respectively reflected the corresponding food culture, ceramic craftsmanship and artistic aesthetic tendency. Song Dynasty acts as the peak of the development of Chinese ceramics, and tea set of Jingdezhen bluish-white ware has become one of the most popular porcelains with its superior materials and humanized design. Meanwhile, Goryeo celadon ware has become one of the most representative arts and crafts symbols in Korean peninsula with its perfect combination of shape, glaze color and pattern decoration.
      Influenced by Chinese tea culture and the porcelain technology of Yue Kiln, there are many similarities and differences between Goryeo celadon ware and Jingdezhen bluish-white ware in the design of tea sets. Both of them are inherited and developed the porcelain technology of Yue Kiln, and the shape design is mostly the imitation of natural things or bronze and gold and silver wares in the early stage. The difference lies in that the shape design of tea sets made of Goryeo celadon is integrated with the national characteristics, and improved to form a unique artistic style of Goryeo characteristics. This paper mainly carries on the comparative analysis of the shape design of tea sets in the two places, with types of tea cup, saucer, and holding pot. We can better understand the design and production of tea sets in the two countries, and apply the ancient design and ingenious thinking to the production of modern tea sets by these comparative studies, so as to better serve the arts and crafts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강경숙, "한국 도자사" 을유문화사 1954

      2 鄭良謨, "高麗青瓷" 文物出版社 2000

      3 野守健, "高麗陶器的研究" 清閑社 1944

      4 陳文華, "韓國茶文化簡史" 7 (7): 2005

      5 蔡襄, "茶錄(外十種)" 上海書店岀版社 2015

      6 沈瓊華, "翡色出高麗:韓國康津高麗青瓷特展" 文物出版社 2012

      7 徐居正, "東國通鑒" 景仁文化社 1989

      8 徐競, "宣和奉使高麗圖經" 商務印書館 1937

      9 陳雨前, "宋代景德鎮青白瓷的審美研究" 世界圖書出版廣東有限公司 2010

      10 孫機, "唐宋時代的茶具與酒具" 4 (4): 1982

      1 강경숙, "한국 도자사" 을유문화사 1954

      2 鄭良謨, "高麗青瓷" 文物出版社 2000

      3 野守健, "高麗陶器的研究" 清閑社 1944

      4 陳文華, "韓國茶文化簡史" 7 (7): 2005

      5 蔡襄, "茶錄(外十種)" 上海書店岀版社 2015

      6 沈瓊華, "翡色出高麗:韓國康津高麗青瓷特展" 文物出版社 2012

      7 徐居正, "東國通鑒" 景仁文化社 1989

      8 徐競, "宣和奉使高麗圖經" 商務印書館 1937

      9 陳雨前, "宋代景德鎮青白瓷的審美研究" 世界圖書出版廣東有限公司 2010

      10 孫機, "唐宋時代的茶具與酒具" 4 (4): 1982

      11 中國矽酸鹽學會, "中國陶瓷史" 文物出版社 1982

      12 田自秉, "中國工藝美術史" 東方出版中心 1985

      13 金富軾, "三國史記·列傳" 吉林文史出版社 1972

      14 金富軾, "三國史記" 吉林文史出版社 1972

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.09
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.13 0.283 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼