자기폭로의 의미 = 「신의 희작」론

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this dissertation is to reveal the aspect of Son Chang-seob’s Shin-ui-hui-jak as an autobiographical novel. Shin-ui-hui-jak has been used as a primary reference which must be dealt with in the study of Son Chang-seob’s litulature. Previous studies showed a tendency to treat the main character and the author Son Chang-seob presented in this work by the same person and extract the shape of a real artist from the main character’s abnormal personality and shocking experience. However, this study noted the writer consciousness that produced the controversial work Shin-ui-hui-jak, not like previous studies that eventually converge into psychoanalytical methodology. This study tried to purpose a new critical view under the premise that Shin-ui-hui-jak is also a fiction just like other stories.
Shin-ui-hui-jak shows it’s character as an autobiographical novel from the introduction. If the autobiographical novel can be defined as a kind of confession, the confessional narration on the story exposes ugly and freakery shape of ego plainly which is distinct from usual confessions. The main character proves that the authority of society and system is nothing more than an illusion by his own existence as a ‘Superflous man’. He is portrayed as a person who has no will to enter the society. Son Chang-seob damages the authority of literature, literaty world and social position of writer by naming it’s character his real name.
The narrator in the story plainly expose the other than self. In this process, the narrator, that is Narrating-I takes the subject of telling position which can realize and expose his ugly shape. He never be ashamed or penitent while he confesses the fault and unusualness of Narrated-I. His confession rather takes attitude of show-offish exposure, and attacks the inherent deception under the reader and social community which is presupposed to be listening the confession.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 병자와 작가 사이-손창섭의 자리
• 3. 타자화된 ‘나’와 폭로의 이면
• 4. 결론
• 참고문헌
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손창섭, "현대한국문학전집 제3권" 신구문화사 476-, 1965

2 이부순, "현대소설 시점의 시학" 새문사 1997

3 강우원용, "해방 후 한국 사소설의 행방" 한국일본어문학회 1 (1): 327-344, 2008

4 우정권, "한국 근대 고백소설의 형성과 서사양식" 소명출판 2004

5 송기숙, "창작과정을 통해 본 손창섭" 1964

6 레온 에델, "작가론의 방법" 삼영사 1983

7 필립 르죈, "자서전의 규약" 문학과지성사 1998

8 가라타니 고진, "일본근대문학의 기원" 민음사 1995

9 방민호, "일본 사소설과 한국의 자전적 소설의 비교" 한국현대문학회 (31) : 35-84, 2010

10 이호규, "손창섭－생래와 현실의 비극적 함수" 글누림출판사 2011

11 송하춘, "손창섭－모멸과 연민의 이중주" 새미 2003

12 박유희, "손창섭 소설의 반어적 기법 연구" 한국근대문학회 (5) : 255-284, 2002

13 공종구, "손창섭 소설의 기원" 한국현대소설학회 (40) : 159-184, 2009

14 이희춘, "손창섭 소설에 나타난 자기파괴와 구원의 의미" 한국문학회 (46) : 431-472, 2007

15 손창섭, "손창섭 단편 전집 2" 가람기획 2005

16 손창섭, "손창섭 단편 전집 1" 가람기획 2005

17 프란츠 K. 스탄젤, "소설형식의 기본유형" 탐구당 1990

18 서영채, "소설의 운명" 문학동네 1995

19 제라르 즈네뜨, "서사담론" 교보문고 1992

20 발터 벤야민, "발터 벤야민의 문예이론" 민음사 1983

21 조두영, "목석의 울음" 서울대학교 출판부 2004

22 유종호, "모멸과 연민 上" 69-77, 1959

23 정철훈, "두 번 실종된 손창섭" 창작과비평사 37 (37): 288-304, 2009

24 츠베탕 토도로프, "덧없는 행복－루소론; 환상문학서설" 한국문화사 1996

25 유종호, "고백이라는 것" 179-187, 1961

26 한수영, "1950년대 한국소설 연구; 남한편" 한국문학연구학회 3 : 36-72, 1991

27 김윤식, "1950년대 문학 연구" 예하 1991