RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      영어 부정에 대한 화용론적 접근 = The Pragmatic Approach on English Negation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A1998628

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper arguing againist the generative transformational model, is attempted to show a pragmatic approach in explaining English negatives. As we know well, the generative transformational model is based on autonomus syntax, which is thought to be i...

      This paper arguing againist the generative transformational model, is attempted to show a pragmatic approach in explaining English negatives. As we know well, the generative transformational model is based on autonomus syntax, which is thought to be inappropiate in explaining many linguistic phenomena. Many kinds of explanatory paramaters are necessary for the complete model, and one of them is pragmatic consideration.
      In chapter 2, I attempt to show briefly how negation in natural language is different from negation in propositional logic. Many theories such as Russell`s, Keenan`s and Kempson`s are examined but they turn out incomplete. This means negation in natural language contains an additional element quite different from logic, which is called discouse presupposition.
      In chapter 3, traditional grammar is examined to give the evidence for the pragmatic approach. Of course in traditional grammar, abstract generalization on negation is possible to some extents but it is quite impossible to explain the complexity of negation.
      In chapter 4, English negative sentences are examined in terms of definiteness, scope of ambiguity and discourse. The result shows that negatives are more marked in terms of pragmatic presuppositions, as compared to affirmatives. That is to say, nagatives are uttered in a context where corresponding affirmatives have already been discussed or where the speaker assumes the hear`s belief in the corresponding affirmative.
      Finally negatives are complex and more restricted in their utterances than affirmatives. So for the comprehensive research on negation, other kinds of paramaters such as psychological, social and ontological facts should be considered.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 논리에서의 부정과 자연언어에서의 부정
      • Ⅲ. 부정에 대한 전통문법적 설명
      • Ⅳ. 부정에 대한 화용론적 접근
      • 1. 부정과 전제
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 논리에서의 부정과 자연언어에서의 부정
      • Ⅲ. 부정에 대한 전통문법적 설명
      • Ⅳ. 부정에 대한 화용론적 접근
      • 1. 부정과 전제
      • 2. 부정의 영향권
      • 3. 부정과 담화
      • Ⅴ. 결 론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼