RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      법학전문대학원 교과과정의 몇 가지 쟁점 = Some Issues of Curriculum of Law Schools - With the Case of Sungkyunkwan Law School -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82504412

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Almost two years have passed since the introduction of the professional law school system in Korea. Now that the system is taking shape, the most important task that remains now is to decide what to teach in professional law schools, and how. This may well be the most important and fundamental thesis underlying the purpose of the establishment of professional law schools and yet, not enough studies have been made on the subject nor has a consensus been reached among the professors or between professors and students. This paper seeks to answer the above question of what to teach in professional law schools and how, or in other words, how to compose the curriculum of professional law schools, with the case of Sungkyunkwan Law School. As a matter of fact, the answer to the above question is already stated in Article 2 of Act On the Establishment and Management of Professional Law Schools. The article states that "the educational ideology of professional law schools is to train legal professionals who have sound professional ethics based on rich education, a deep understanding of people and the society, and morals valuing freedom, equality and justice; and who have knowledge and abilities that will allow professional and efficient solutions to diverse legal disputes, in order to provide high quality legal services responding to the diverse expectations and requests of the people. In order to preserve the intent of the above law, professional law schools should reflect on the former law education, which was remote from solutions to real-life problems but merely stayed at the stage of education focused on abstract theories and preparation for examinations. Accordingly, the curriculum of professional law schools should be distinctively different from that of the past, and should be reformed so that legal professionals are trained to hold a sense of morals and values, and are capable of providing professional and efficient solutions to complex legal disputes. Taking the above points into consideration, the curriculum of Sungkyunkwan Law School was composed as follows. First, balance between mandatory and non-mandatory courses was considered. Second, balance between theoretic and practical courses was considered. Third, a eight-major-category-system was introduced to help students raise their basic talents as legal professionals and proficiency in their area of expertise. Fourth, and unified education was implemented with new learning methods such as team teaching and PBL to help students raise practical and creative problem-solving abilities. Fifth, more opportunities for various externships and internships were provided to the students to help them raise their practical abilities and experience more about their area of expertise. Sixth, through a substantial exchange with universities abroad, more opportunities were provided to the students to increase their foreign language abilities and ultimately, strengthen their international competitiveness. The following are what need to be complemented to the curriculum of Korea's professional law schools, including Sungkyunkwan Law School. First, in order for professional law schools to advance from an institute that just prepares students for examinations, to amore specialized and professional educative institute, the number of mandatory courses should be minimized and the students' right of choice maximized. Second, considering the establishing purpose of professional law schools and the reality where professional law school graduates are immediately thrown into actual business, the number of practical courses should be increased and the content of the education strengthened. Third, the former cramming system of education should be avoided and instead, new learning methods such as question-and-answer, Socratic method, team teaching, and PBL should be adopted and encouraged.
      번역하기

      Almost two years have passed since the introduction of the professional law school system in Korea. Now that the system is taking shape, the most important task that remains now is to decide what to teach in professional law schools, and how. This may...

      Almost two years have passed since the introduction of the professional law school system in Korea. Now that the system is taking shape, the most important task that remains now is to decide what to teach in professional law schools, and how. This may well be the most important and fundamental thesis underlying the purpose of the establishment of professional law schools and yet, not enough studies have been made on the subject nor has a consensus been reached among the professors or between professors and students. This paper seeks to answer the above question of what to teach in professional law schools and how, or in other words, how to compose the curriculum of professional law schools, with the case of Sungkyunkwan Law School. As a matter of fact, the answer to the above question is already stated in Article 2 of Act On the Establishment and Management of Professional Law Schools. The article states that "the educational ideology of professional law schools is to train legal professionals who have sound professional ethics based on rich education, a deep understanding of people and the society, and morals valuing freedom, equality and justice; and who have knowledge and abilities that will allow professional and efficient solutions to diverse legal disputes, in order to provide high quality legal services responding to the diverse expectations and requests of the people. In order to preserve the intent of the above law, professional law schools should reflect on the former law education, which was remote from solutions to real-life problems but merely stayed at the stage of education focused on abstract theories and preparation for examinations. Accordingly, the curriculum of professional law schools should be distinctively different from that of the past, and should be reformed so that legal professionals are trained to hold a sense of morals and values, and are capable of providing professional and efficient solutions to complex legal disputes. Taking the above points into consideration, the curriculum of Sungkyunkwan Law School was composed as follows. First, balance between mandatory and non-mandatory courses was considered. Second, balance between theoretic and practical courses was considered. Third, a eight-major-category-system was introduced to help students raise their basic talents as legal professionals and proficiency in their area of expertise. Fourth, and unified education was implemented with new learning methods such as team teaching and PBL to help students raise practical and creative problem-solving abilities. Fifth, more opportunities for various externships and internships were provided to the students to help them raise their practical abilities and experience more about their area of expertise. Sixth, through a substantial exchange with universities abroad, more opportunities were provided to the students to increase their foreign language abilities and ultimately, strengthen their international competitiveness. The following are what need to be complemented to the curriculum of Korea's professional law schools, including Sungkyunkwan Law School. First, in order for professional law schools to advance from an institute that just prepares students for examinations, to amore specialized and professional educative institute, the number of mandatory courses should be minimized and the students' right of choice maximized. Second, considering the establishing purpose of professional law schools and the reality where professional law school graduates are immediately thrown into actual business, the number of practical courses should be increased and the content of the education strengthened. Third, the former cramming system of education should be avoided and instead, new learning methods such as question-and-answer, Socratic method, team teaching, and PBL should be adopted and encouraged.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 필수과목과 선택과목 간의 균형
      • Ⅲ. 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
      • Ⅳ. 법학교육방법론
      • Ⅴ. 맺는 말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 필수과목과 선택과목 간의 균형
      • Ⅲ. 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
      • Ⅳ. 법학교육방법론
      • Ⅴ. 맺는 말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼