RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Implementation of a Patient-Centric Digital Health Application for Primary Healthcare in India

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107899438

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: Health systems are shifting from traditional methods of healthcare delivery to delivery using digital applications. This change was introduced at a primary care centre in Chandigarh, India that served a marginalised population. Afterestabl...

      Objectives: Health systems are shifting from traditional methods of healthcare delivery to delivery using digital applications. This change was introduced at a primary care centre in Chandigarh, India that served a marginalised population. Afterestablishing the digital health system, we explored stakeholders’ perceptions regarding its implementation. Methods: Ethnographicmethods were used to explore stakeholders’ perceptions regarding the implementation of the Integrated Health InformationSystem for Primary Health Care (IHIS4PHC), which was developed as a patient-centric digital health application. Data were collected using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Participatory observations were made of day-todayactivities including outpatient visits, outreach field visits, and methods of health practice. The collected information wasanalysed using thematic coding. Results: Healthcare workers highlighted that working with the digital health system was initiallyarduous, but they later realised its usefulness, as the digital system made it easier to search records and generate reports,rapidly providing evidence to make decisions. Auxiliary nurse midwives reported that recording information on computerssaved time when generating reports; however, systematic and mandatory data entry made recording tedious. Staff were apprehensiveabout the use of computer-based data for monitoring their work performance. Patients appreciated that theirprevious records were now available on the computer for easy retrieval. Conclusions: The usefulness of the digital health applicationwas appreciated by various primary healthcare stakeholders. Barriers persisted due to perceived needs for flexibilityin delivering healthcare services, and apprehensions continued because of increased transparency, accountability, and dependenceon computers and digital technicians.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Barello S, "eHealth for patient engagement : a systematic review" 6 : 2013-, 2016

      2 Berwick DM, "What ‘patient-centered’ should mean:confessions of an extremist" 28 (28): w555-w565, 2009

      3 Foley G, "Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences" 50 (50): 1195-1210, 2015

      4 Venkatesh V, "User acceptance of information technology : toward a unified view" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

      5 Michie S, "The behaviour change wheel : a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions" 6 : 42-, 2011

      6 Ndabarora E, "Systematic review of health data quality management and best practices at community and district levels in LMIC" 30 (30): 103-120, 2014

      7 Pawson R, "Realist evaluation" Sage

      8 Faujdar DS, "Public health information systems for primary health care in India : a situational analysis study" 8 (8): 3640-3646, 2019

      9 Adane K, "Processing medical data : a systematic review" 71 (71): 27-, 2013

      10 Runz-Jorgensen SM, "Perceived value of eHealth among people living with multimorbidity : a qualitative study" 7 (7): 96-111, 2017

      1 Barello S, "eHealth for patient engagement : a systematic review" 6 : 2013-, 2016

      2 Berwick DM, "What ‘patient-centered’ should mean:confessions of an extremist" 28 (28): w555-w565, 2009

      3 Foley G, "Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences" 50 (50): 1195-1210, 2015

      4 Venkatesh V, "User acceptance of information technology : toward a unified view" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

      5 Michie S, "The behaviour change wheel : a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions" 6 : 42-, 2011

      6 Ndabarora E, "Systematic review of health data quality management and best practices at community and district levels in LMIC" 30 (30): 103-120, 2014

      7 Pawson R, "Realist evaluation" Sage

      8 Faujdar DS, "Public health information systems for primary health care in India : a situational analysis study" 8 (8): 3640-3646, 2019

      9 Adane K, "Processing medical data : a systematic review" 71 (71): 27-, 2013

      10 Runz-Jorgensen SM, "Perceived value of eHealth among people living with multimorbidity : a qualitative study" 7 (7): 96-111, 2017

      11 Flatley Brennan P, "Patientcentered Information Systems" (1) : 79-86, 2000

      12 Mannan R, "Is primary care ready to embrace e-health? A qualitative study of staff in a London primary care trust" 14 (14): 121-131, 2006

      13 Sequist TD, "Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service" 14 (14): 191-197, 2007

      14 Tripathi S, Sharma R, Nagarajan S., "Health information systems in India: challenges and way forward" Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA)

      15 Li J, "Health care provider adoption of eHealth : systematic literature review" 2 (2): e7-, 2013

      16 Faujdar DS, "Field testing of a digital health information system for primary health care : a quasi-experimental study from India" 141 : 104235-, 2020

      17 Granja C, "Factors determining the success and failure of eHealth interventions : systematic review of the literature" 20 (20): e10235-, 2018

      18 Lilford RJ, "Evaluating eHealth : how to make evaluation more methodologically robust" 6 (6): e1000186-, 2009

      19 Peters DH, "Can computers improve patient care by primary health care workers in India" 18 (18): 437-445, 2006

      20 Singh T, "Assessment of universal healthcare coverage in a district of North India : a rapid cross-sectional survey using tablet computers" 11 (11): e0157831-, 2016

      21 Gagnon MP, "An integrated strategy of knowledge application for optimal e-health implementation : a multimethod study protocol" 8 : 17-, 2008

      22 Talboom-Kamp EP, "An eHealth platform to manage chronic disease in primary care : an innovative approach" 5 (5): e5-, 2016

      23 Kotze P, "A conceptual data model for a primary health care patient-centric electronic medical record system"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-04-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한의료정보학회지 -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      외국어명 : Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.15 0.434 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼