政策認知와 私人主義的 行政機關接觸에 關한 實證的 考察 = An Empirical Study on Policy Perception and Personal Contact with Administrative Agencies

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. The objectives of this study are to explain the residents attitudes' for policy and administrative agencies. For the purpose, the author intends to analysis and to varify the relationship between independent variables and dependent variables. The formers are such as formal education, age, mass media, training, administrative support and consciousness development, the latters are such as policy concern, policy perception, policy participation, policy expectation and personal attitudes.
2. The relationship between Policy Concern and Independent Variables. The first, correlation coefficient between formal education and policy concern is r=0.62, and to test the significance of correlation coefficient by the method of analysis of variance, F=154.8>F_(α)=9.76
The third, correlation coefficient between mass media and policy concern is r=0.47,
F=70.31>F_(α)=6.76
The forth, correlation coefficient between training and policy concern is r=0.75,
F=318.86>F_(α)=6.76
The fifth, correlation coefficient between administrative supports and policy concern is r=0.78, F=385.3<F_(α)=6.76
The sisth, correlation coefficient between consciousness development and policy concevn is r=0.82, F=599.02>F_(α)=6.76
3. The relationship between Policy Perception and Independent Variables.
The first, correlation coefficient between formal education and policy perception is r=0.52, F=91.91>F_(α)=6.76
The second, correlation coefficient between age and policy perception is r=0.39, F=44.84>F_(α)=6.76
The third, correlation coefficient between mass media and policy perception is r=0.35, F=34.62>F_(α)=6.76
The forth, correlation coefficient between training and policy perception is r=0.64, F=172.05>F_(α)=6.76
The fifth, correlation coefficient between administrative supports and plicy perception is r=0.58, F=125.72>F_(α)=6.76
The sisth, correlation coefficient between consciousness development and policy perception is r=0.61, F=146.97>F_(α)=6.76
4. The realtionship between Policy Participation and Independent Variables.
The first correlation coefficient between formal education and policy participation is r=0.30, F=24.52>F_(α)=6.76
The second, correlation coefficient between mass media and policy participation is r=0.37, F=39.34>F_(α)=6.76
The third, correlation coefficient between mass media and policy participation is r=0.43, F=56.26>F_(α)=6.76
The forth, correlation coefficient between training and policy participation is r=0.57, F=119.35>F_(α)=6.76
The fifth, correlation coefficient between administrative supports and policy participation is r=0.59, F=132.42>F_(α)=6.76
The sisth, correlation coefficient between consciousness development and policy participation is r=0.51, F=87.18>F_(α)=6.76
5. The relationship between Policy Expectation and Independent Variables.
The first, correlation coefficient between formal education and policy expectation is r=0.46, F=66.56>F_(α)=6.76
The second, correlation coefficient between age and policy expectation is r=0.40 F=47.23>F_(α)=6.76
The third, correlation coefficient between mass media and policy expectation is r=0.62, F=74.24>F_(α)=6.76
The fifth, correlation coefficient between administrative supports and policy expectation is r=0.60, F=139.5>F_(α)=6.76
The sixth, correlation coefficient between consciousness development and policy expectation is r=0.57, F=119.35>F_(α)=6.76
6. The relationship between Personal Attitude and Independent Variables.
The first, correlation coefficient between formal education and personal attitude is r=-0.1737, F=7.71>F_(α)=6.76
The second, correlation between age and personal attitude is r=0.1214, F=3.71<F_(α(α=0.01))=6.76, F=3.71<F_(α(α=0.06))=3.89; r is not significant.
The third, correlation coefficient between mass media and personal attitude is r=0.0453, F=0.509<F_(α(α=0.06))=3.89; i is not significant.
The forth, correlation coefficient between training and persoral attitude is r=0.0625, F=0.969<F_(α(α=0.06))=3.89; r is not significant.
The fifth, correlation coefficient between administrative supports and personal attitude is r=0.1907, F=9.35>F_(α(α=0.01))=6.76
The sixth, correlation coefficient between consciousness development and personal attitude is r=0.1454, F_(α(α=0.01))=6.76>F=5.35>F_(α(α=0.01))=3.89
7. Accordingly, independent variables are somewhat correlated to policy concern, policy perception, policy participation and policy expection, but those are not correlated to personal attitude. This means that Korean rural society is alike to the Prismatic Society of Fred. W. Riggs, which is in the changing stage from fused society (or agricultural society) to diffracted society (or industrial society). Byt the modernization which includes factors such as formal education, age, mass media, training, administrative supports and consciousness development, the consciousness of rural residents such as policy concern, policy perception, policy participation and policy expectation are deeple effected, but their behavior (or action) such as personal contact to the administrative agencies is not effected.
This means that rural residents are deeple changed in their consciousness, but their behavior (or action) is not changed at the same degree as their consiousness because of their heritage, Confucianism.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 序 論 = 25
• II. 韓國人의 意識構造와 行態의 近代化 = 27
• 1. 意識構造와 行態 = 27
• 2. 韓國人의 意識構造 = 28
• 3. 近代的 人間과 近代化要因 = 30
• 4. 本 硏究의 理論的 根據 = 31
• III. 政策에 對한 地域主民의 態度 = 32
• 1. 槪念定義와 指標構成 = 32
• 2. 政策開心 = 33
• 3. 政策認知 = 35
• 4. 政策參與 = 36
• 5. 政策期待 = 37
• 6. 綜合的 評價 = 38
• IV. 行政機關에 對한 地域主民의 態度 = 40
• 1. 槪念定義와 指標構成 = 40
• 2. 學歷과 私人主義的 態度 = 40
• 3. 年齡과 私人主義的 態度 = 40
• 4. Mass Media接觸과 私人主義的 態度 = 41
• 5. 訓練과 私人主義的 態度 = 41
• 6. 政府支援 과 私人主義的 態度 = 41
• 7. 意識發達과 私人主義的 態度 = 41
• 8. 綜合評價 = 42
• V. 結 論 = 42