RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      도심교통소음의 노출시간에 따른 라우드니스 및 어노이언스의 주관적 반응에 대한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100172961

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A study has been conducted to investigate the subjective responses of loudness and annoyance according to the exposed time of urban traffic noise in controlled laboratory environment. To make a closer inspection into psychological response relevant to...

      A study has been conducted to investigate the subjective responses of loudness and annoyance according to the exposed time of urban traffic noise in controlled laboratory environment. To make a closer inspection into psychological response relevant to noise characteristics while varying the time of exposure to noise, the subjects were presented a set of noises with different exposed time and requested to judge spontaneously on a 100-unipolar scale. To be concrete, the subjects were exposed to noises being varied in time from 15 sec up to max. 1,200 sec for the controlled traffic noise sources. So far achieved from laborious tests, it has an importance being on the logarithmic relations of perceived loudness and exposed time, say, it is more increased the perceived loudness in the sorter exposed time than in the longer exposed time. However, the trend is said to be not effective for the case of annoyance. On the other hand, the subjective impressions on relative annoyance of noise is shown to be correlated with the noise characteristics such as loudness (sones), tonality and time with logarithmic scale, the product correlation moment being calculated as $R^{2}=0.99$. The variances to be explained for annoyance assessments through varying the time of exposure were ranged between 30 % and 50% for the exposed time, $27{\sim}37%$ for tonality, and $34{\sim}20%$ for loudness, respectively With these results, hopefully, it can be helpful for those who want to work out an experimental design for evaluating an environmental noise or to quantify any psychological dimensions found in annoyance assessments.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 류종관, "청감실험을 통한 생활소음의 평가척도 및 기준 설정" 한국소음진동공학회 15 (15): 904-910, 2005

      2 장서일, "도심지 재개발사업 환경영향평가시 소음지도 적용방안에 관한 연구" 한국소음진동공학회 15 (15): 1311-1317, 2005

      3 김선우, "도로교통소음에 대한 공동주택 내부소음 기준설정에 관한 연구" 한국소음진동공학회 15 (15): 1084-1091, 2005

      4 Henrietta V. C. Howarth, "The Annoyance Caused by Simultaneous Noise and Vibration from Railways" 89 (89): 2318-2323, 1991

      5 JUSE press, "Research Committee of Sensory Evaluation, Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers, Sensory Evaluation Handbook"

      6 Namba, S., "Report of the Commitee of the Social Survey on Noise Problems" 17 (17): 109-113, 1996

      7 Namba, S., "Psychological Study on Leq as a Measure of Loudness of Various Kinds of Noises" 5 : 135-148, 1984

      8 Lee, K., "Methodological Conside-rations in Social Surveys of Residents’ Reactions to Environmental Noise: Based on the Study of Aircraft Noise around Kimpo Airport in Seoul, Environmental Noise Risk Survey and Assessment, The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering and Korean Society of Environmental Engineers"

      9 Berglund, B., "Exploring Perceptual Content in Soundscapes, In Fechner Day 2001. Lengerich" Pabst Science Publishers 279-284, 2001

      10 Hur, D. J., "A Study on Systems Approach to Improve the Sound Quality in the Vehicle Interior" Ajou University 2002

      1 류종관, "청감실험을 통한 생활소음의 평가척도 및 기준 설정" 한국소음진동공학회 15 (15): 904-910, 2005

      2 장서일, "도심지 재개발사업 환경영향평가시 소음지도 적용방안에 관한 연구" 한국소음진동공학회 15 (15): 1311-1317, 2005

      3 김선우, "도로교통소음에 대한 공동주택 내부소음 기준설정에 관한 연구" 한국소음진동공학회 15 (15): 1084-1091, 2005

      4 Henrietta V. C. Howarth, "The Annoyance Caused by Simultaneous Noise and Vibration from Railways" 89 (89): 2318-2323, 1991

      5 JUSE press, "Research Committee of Sensory Evaluation, Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers, Sensory Evaluation Handbook"

      6 Namba, S., "Report of the Commitee of the Social Survey on Noise Problems" 17 (17): 109-113, 1996

      7 Namba, S., "Psychological Study on Leq as a Measure of Loudness of Various Kinds of Noises" 5 : 135-148, 1984

      8 Lee, K., "Methodological Conside-rations in Social Surveys of Residents’ Reactions to Environmental Noise: Based on the Study of Aircraft Noise around Kimpo Airport in Seoul, Environmental Noise Risk Survey and Assessment, The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering and Korean Society of Environmental Engineers"

      9 Berglund, B., "Exploring Perceptual Content in Soundscapes, In Fechner Day 2001. Lengerich" Pabst Science Publishers 279-284, 2001

      10 Hur, D. J., "A Study on Systems Approach to Improve the Sound Quality in the Vehicle Interior" Ajou University 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-02-05 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society For Noise And Vibration Engeering (Ksnve) -> Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering(KSNVE) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.28 0.28 0.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.23 0.457 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼