성리학과 지행문제 = Neo-confucianism and Viewpoint of Knowledge and Conduct - focused on both Zhe zi and Wang Yangming Title

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Modern society is drowning in a flood of information. Such information has set modern people free acting up to what they say.
While an enthusiastic attitude to gain knowledge gives them absolute benefits in their lives, it is not necessarily true that a negative attitude to acquire knowledge causes some disadvantage to their lives. The expansion of knowledge can be successful through education.
Immature children become mature through education, and such mature people in society tends to show the consistency of action and knowledge.
The purpose of this study is about knowledge and its practice presented in Neo-Confucianism. This study will compare Zhu zi s viewpoint of knowledge and conduct with Wang’s viewpoint, two of whom are the representatives of this problem. Zhu zi s viewpoint is “First knowledge and then conduct”. Wang’s perspective is the unity of knowledge and conduct. However, their viewpoints have something in common as well as something different. First, both, knowledge and conduct, are equally important. Second, a focus on action rather than knowledge is stressed as a final goal to reach. Third, their viewpoints are human-centered philosophy. The problem cannot be discussed without focusing on human. Of course, there exist some different opinions between them. The matter of “the cognition of subject and object” is the first. While Zhu zi emphasizes the division of subject and object, Wang stresses the unity of subject and object. Having, thus, different approaches for the matter, Zhu zi puts more emphasis on human nature as a core logic, but Wang regards human mind as a core logic.
The problem of knowledge and conduct is still one of philosophical issues to further study. It seems that modern society ostensibly has less interests in the problem of knowledge and conduct, but if you look closely at many problems in society, the necessity of studying the problem is strongly required. Modern people seem to have trouble acting proactively in their lives. In order to win any competition with others, modern people try to collect tremendous amount of information(knowledge), but they are very careful not to cross the border of illegality. This study is not about returning to the past, but about the unity, or the balance, of the knowledge and conduct.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 주자(朱子)의 지행관(知行觀)
• Ⅲ. 양명(陽明)의 지행관(知行觀)
• Ⅵ. 주자-양명 지행관의 동이성 (同異性)
• Ⅴ. 나오는 말

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김유혁, "李退溪의 人間像" 청탑서림 1989

2 "論語集註"

3 이인철, "퇴계의 작성적 인간관과 그 교육적 함의 : 『성학십도』를 중심으로" 경북대학교 대학원 2009

4 한국사상연구회, "조선유학의 [개념]들" 예문서원 2003

5 한정길, "전습록" 청계 2001

6 유명종, "왕양명과 양명학" 청계 2002

7 陳來, "양명철학" 예문서원 2003

8 황갑연, "양명의 주자철학 비판의 適否에 관한 고찰 -『전습록』을 근거로-" 범한철학회 79 (79): 27-52, 2015

9 한병철, "시간의 향기, 머무름의 기술" 문학과지성사 2014

10 최재목, "내 마음이 등불이다" 이학사 2003

11 "退溪全書"

12 "退溪先生文集"

13 "與猶堂全書"

14 염호택, "王陽明의 知行合一에 관한 硏究" 한국양명학회 (26) : 117-147, 2010

15 김순임, "王陽明의 知行合一說 연구" 원광대학교불교사상연구원 1995

16 "王陽明全集"

17 "朱子語類"

18 장성모, "新儒學의 道德敎育 理論" 한국도덕교육학회 5 : 1993

19 "大學·中庸集註"