RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      社會開發과 社會政策 = Social Development and Social Policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106110746

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper attempts to examine recent concepts of social development and social policy, identifying the similarity of the two concepts in contemporary studies.
      As is well known, the history of studies on social development is not long. They were started after the Second World War by the United Nations as a subordinate field of its efforts to help the economic development of under-developed countries. Since the 1960's, with the begining of "the Development Decade," the concept of social development has risen itself into one of two main notions of development, as a notion in balance, with that of economic development.
      The concept of social development has a close connection with that of "the regional development" and "the community development." There were often some overlaps and confusions in defining those concepts. But the main differences among them can be said as follow; the regional and community development is basically directed at economic and material growth, and the social development is ultimately oriented to the welfare society making.
      On the contrary, social policy has had a quite long history since the 19th century. Social policy has been usually defined in two ways of it; the first one is that so called "traditional definition." the second one may be called "a contemporary definition." While the former set up by German and Japanese scholars is a narrow definition focused on "how to control and preserve labor's situations effectively," the latter used by most Anglo-American scholars has a broad social program, social reform, or social planning", instead of social policy.
      Recently, many scholars such as M.Macbeath, W.Hagenbuch, F.Lafitte, T.H. Marshall, M.Rein, F.H.Parker and so on have given it a very similar definition to that of social development.
      In conclusion, in view of the observation, it may be argued that social policy should be conducted as a social development and its policy.
      번역하기

      This paper attempts to examine recent concepts of social development and social policy, identifying the similarity of the two concepts in contemporary studies. As is well known, the history of studies on social development is not long. They were start...

      This paper attempts to examine recent concepts of social development and social policy, identifying the similarity of the two concepts in contemporary studies.
      As is well known, the history of studies on social development is not long. They were started after the Second World War by the United Nations as a subordinate field of its efforts to help the economic development of under-developed countries. Since the 1960's, with the begining of "the Development Decade," the concept of social development has risen itself into one of two main notions of development, as a notion in balance, with that of economic development.
      The concept of social development has a close connection with that of "the regional development" and "the community development." There were often some overlaps and confusions in defining those concepts. But the main differences among them can be said as follow; the regional and community development is basically directed at economic and material growth, and the social development is ultimately oriented to the welfare society making.
      On the contrary, social policy has had a quite long history since the 19th century. Social policy has been usually defined in two ways of it; the first one is that so called "traditional definition." the second one may be called "a contemporary definition." While the former set up by German and Japanese scholars is a narrow definition focused on "how to control and preserve labor's situations effectively," the latter used by most Anglo-American scholars has a broad social program, social reform, or social planning", instead of social policy.
      Recently, many scholars such as M.Macbeath, W.Hagenbuch, F.Lafitte, T.H. Marshall, M.Rein, F.H.Parker and so on have given it a very similar definition to that of social development.
      In conclusion, in view of the observation, it may be argued that social policy should be conducted as a social development and its policy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 序 言 = 45
      • II. 社會開發論의 意義 = 46
      • 1. 社會開發論의 展開 = 46
      • 2. 社會開發論의 包括性 = 48
      • III. 社會정책의 多義性 = 53
      • I. 序 言 = 45
      • II. 社會開發論의 意義 = 46
      • 1. 社會開發論의 展開 = 46
      • 2. 社會開發論의 包括性 = 48
      • III. 社會정책의 多義性 = 53
      • 1. 獨·日系 社會政策論 = 53
      • 2. 英·美系 社會政策論 = 55
      • IV. 社會開發과 社會政策 = 58
      • 1. 社會開發政策의 要請 = 58
      • 2. 社會開發로서의 社會政策 = 61
      • V. 結 言 = 63
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼