RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      金範禹와 그의 가계 = A Study on the Kim Beom-u(金範禹) and His Lineage

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82349554

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper studied on the Kim Beom-u (金範禹) and his lineage who was first persecuted in 1785 for his belief in Roman Catholicism (天主敎). Followings are results of the research in this paper:
      First, the Kim Beom-u's ancestors began to separate themselves from YangBan (兩班) lineage and to form Chungin (中人) lineage in the early 17th century. From that time on, some of the Kim's ancestors passed not only Mugua (武科) but also Japgua (雜科). Although they passed Mugua, their social status as Chungin were unchanged. The existing arguments that Kim's lineage was changed from Muban (武班) status into Chungin status must be reexamined because their social status was never changed since they had became Chungin in the early 17th century.
      Second, though Kim Beom-u's father Kim Ui-seo (金義瑞) had four legitimate children from his wife who had been still alive, he had more children from a concubine. He also paid some funds for publications of his lineage books, ChogPo (族譜). Such actions were very popular practices in Chungin society. On the contrary, the fact that Kim Ik-han (金翊漢), Kim Beom-u's great-grandfather, after passing the YugGua (譯科), became active in a chief interpreter of a diplomatic envoy to Beijing (北京) illuminated that Kim Beom-u's lineage seems to be quite open to the outside world.
      Third, the existing research emphasized that Chungin accommodated Catholicism because of their resistance to the discrimination by YangBan. But Chungin also must be giving up desires for getting public offices or concubines to receive Catholicism. Kim Beom-u, as the member of a powerful Chungin lineage, must have more determination than other Chungin members become a Catholic believer because Kim Beom-u could easily get those advantages such as public offices or concubines.
      Fourth, Kim Beom-u was intimate with Yi-Byeok (李檗) because they were related by marriage. Their in-lawships were formed by Kim Ssi (金氏) who was Jeong Yak-yong (丁若鏞)'s father's concubine. But the most important reason for their intimate relationships was the fact that Kim Beom-u was a man of great knowledge. The fact that Yi-Byeok was a great scholar and Kim Beom-u propagated many people such as not only Chungin but also YangBan make me surmise their close relations.
      Fifth, the Kim Beom-u's descendants still had married with Chungin after 20 years of his persecution. Kim Dong-yup (金東曄), Kim Beom-u's grandson, who resided in Mil-Yang (密陽), associated with YugGuan (譯官) who kept high ranking public offices in Seoul. The purpose of his intimate relations with them was to maintain his social position for his family. Kim Dong-yup kept the relationship by marriage and the scop of the relationship was very wide. Through this fact we can conclude that interrelationship in the late ChoSon (朝鮮) society was very powerfully influenced by not only blood but also marriage.
      Sixth, through this research I can notice that the most important qualification of Chung in was kept in the blood, and Chungin must marry Chungin and reside in Seoul or suburb to maintain it's status.
      번역하기

      This paper studied on the Kim Beom-u (金範禹) and his lineage who was first persecuted in 1785 for his belief in Roman Catholicism (天主敎). Followings are results of the research in this paper: First, the Kim Beom-u's ancestors began to sepa...

      This paper studied on the Kim Beom-u (金範禹) and his lineage who was first persecuted in 1785 for his belief in Roman Catholicism (天主敎). Followings are results of the research in this paper:
      First, the Kim Beom-u's ancestors began to separate themselves from YangBan (兩班) lineage and to form Chungin (中人) lineage in the early 17th century. From that time on, some of the Kim's ancestors passed not only Mugua (武科) but also Japgua (雜科). Although they passed Mugua, their social status as Chungin were unchanged. The existing arguments that Kim's lineage was changed from Muban (武班) status into Chungin status must be reexamined because their social status was never changed since they had became Chungin in the early 17th century.
      Second, though Kim Beom-u's father Kim Ui-seo (金義瑞) had four legitimate children from his wife who had been still alive, he had more children from a concubine. He also paid some funds for publications of his lineage books, ChogPo (族譜). Such actions were very popular practices in Chungin society. On the contrary, the fact that Kim Ik-han (金翊漢), Kim Beom-u's great-grandfather, after passing the YugGua (譯科), became active in a chief interpreter of a diplomatic envoy to Beijing (北京) illuminated that Kim Beom-u's lineage seems to be quite open to the outside world.
      Third, the existing research emphasized that Chungin accommodated Catholicism because of their resistance to the discrimination by YangBan. But Chungin also must be giving up desires for getting public offices or concubines to receive Catholicism. Kim Beom-u, as the member of a powerful Chungin lineage, must have more determination than other Chungin members become a Catholic believer because Kim Beom-u could easily get those advantages such as public offices or concubines.
      Fourth, Kim Beom-u was intimate with Yi-Byeok (李檗) because they were related by marriage. Their in-lawships were formed by Kim Ssi (金氏) who was Jeong Yak-yong (丁若鏞)'s father's concubine. But the most important reason for their intimate relationships was the fact that Kim Beom-u was a man of great knowledge. The fact that Yi-Byeok was a great scholar and Kim Beom-u propagated many people such as not only Chungin but also YangBan make me surmise their close relations.
      Fifth, the Kim Beom-u's descendants still had married with Chungin after 20 years of his persecution. Kim Dong-yup (金東曄), Kim Beom-u's grandson, who resided in Mil-Yang (密陽), associated with YugGuan (譯官) who kept high ranking public offices in Seoul. The purpose of his intimate relations with them was to maintain his social position for his family. Kim Dong-yup kept the relationship by marriage and the scop of the relationship was very wide. Through this fact we can conclude that interrelationship in the late ChoSon (朝鮮) society was very powerfully influenced by not only blood but also marriage.
      Sixth, through this research I can notice that the most important qualification of Chung in was kept in the blood, and Chungin must marry Chungin and reside in Seoul or suburb to maintain it's status.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 선대 가계
      • 3. 가정 환경
      • 4. 후손들의 사회적 지위
      • 5. 맺는말
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 선대 가계
      • 3. 가정 환경
      • 4. 후손들의 사회적 지위
      • 5. 맺는말
      • 찬고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김길수, "한국의 첫 순교자 김범우 토마스" 1620 : 2003

      2 최석우, "천주교의 수용" 국사편찬위원회 1982

      3 최석우, "천주교의 수용" 국사편찬위원회 1983

      4 김양수, "천녕현씨 집안 연구" 102 : 1998

      5 손숙경, "중인 김범우 가문과 그들의 문서" 부산교구 순교자 현양위원회 1992

      6 이원순, "조선후기사회 중인층의 서교수용" 1987

      7 조광, "조선후기 천주교 지도층의 특성" 105 : 1985

      8 김두헌, "조선후기 중인의 서류 및 첩에 대한 차별" 조선시 대사학회 13 : 2000

      9 김현영, "조선후기 중인의 가계와 경력―역관 천녕현씨가 고문서의 분석―" 8 : 1987

      10 김두헌, "조선후기 기술직 중인 서류의 혼인과 과거합격 및 관직진출" 국립민속박물관 (14) : 59-88, 2004

      1 김길수, "한국의 첫 순교자 김범우 토마스" 1620 : 2003

      2 최석우, "천주교의 수용" 국사편찬위원회 1982

      3 최석우, "천주교의 수용" 국사편찬위원회 1983

      4 김양수, "천녕현씨 집안 연구" 102 : 1998

      5 손숙경, "중인 김범우 가문과 그들의 문서" 부산교구 순교자 현양위원회 1992

      6 이원순, "조선후기사회 중인층의 서교수용" 1987

      7 조광, "조선후기 천주교 지도층의 특성" 105 : 1985

      8 김두헌, "조선후기 중인의 서류 및 첩에 대한 차별" 조선시 대사학회 13 : 2000

      9 김현영, "조선후기 중인의 가계와 경력―역관 천녕현씨가 고문서의 분석―" 8 : 1987

      10 김두헌, "조선후기 기술직 중인 서류의 혼인과 과거합격 및 관직진출" 국립민속박물관 (14) : 59-88, 2004

      11 李尙奎, "조선후기 川寧玄氏家의 譯官活動" 한일관계사학회 (20) : 2004

      12 마백락, "순교자 김범우 묘소와 신자촌. in: 경상도 교회와 순교자들" 대건출판사 1989

      13 김양수, "서울 중인의 19세기 생활―천녕현씨 역관 탁의 일기를 중심으로―〉" 청주대학교 인문과학연구소 26 : 2003

      14 박광용, "김범우의 시대적 배경" 150 : 1987

      15 최석우, "김범우의 생애" 150 : 1987

      16 차기진, "김범우와 형제들. in: 한국가톨릭대사전 2" 한국교회사연구소 1995

      17 이원순, "김범우와 명례동" (150) : 1987

      18 이원순, "김범우가 논고. in: 한국 가톨릭 문화활동과 교회사" 한국교회사연구소 1991

      19 마백락, "경상도 지방의 천주교 복음 전파와 김범우" 41 : 2004

      20 김두헌, "개항이후(1876~1894년) 잡과와 주학 입격자 신분" 1 : 2002

      21 金相淳, "靜軒草稿 1책" 서울대학교 규장각도서관

      22 오주석, "檀園 金弘道―조선적인,너무나 조선적인 화가―" 열화당 미술선서 1998

      23 鈴木信昭, "李氏朝鮮における天主敎受容時の中人層の役割" 동양대학문학부사학과연구실 1983

      24 "朝鮮王朝實錄"

      25 김두헌, "技術職 中人 身分 硏究" 전북대학교 대학원 2001

      26 김두헌, "差備待令畵員의 신분과 세전 및 혼인" 전북사학회 (31) : 43-82, 2007

      27 이창현, "姓源錄 영인" 고려대학교 중앙도서관 1985

      28 김두헌, "『寫字廳先生案』과 조선시대 寫字官의 신분" 한국고문서학회 24 : 237-274, 2004

      29 Dallet, "《한국천주교회사》 상" 한국교회사연구소 1980

      30 "《雲科榜目》, 국립중앙도서관 소장"

      31 "《醫譯籌八世譜》, 장서각 소장"

      32 "《醫等第譜》, 국립중앙도서관 소장"

      33 "《醫科榜目》, 2책, 하버드 엔칭도서관 소장"

      34 "《醫科八世譜》, 서울대학교 규장각 도서관 소장"

      35 "《象院科榜》 하버드 엔칭도서관 소장"

      36 "《譯等第譜》, 서울대학교 규장각도서관 소장"

      37 "《譯科八世譜》, 서울대학교 규장각도서관 소장"

      38 "《籌學八世譜》, 서울대학교 중앙도서관 소장"

      39 "《籌學入格案》, 2책" 서울대학교 규장각도서관

      40 "《石樊日記》, 玄鐸, 1책, 필사본, 천녕 현씨 종친회 소장"

      41 "《牛峯金氏世譜》, 1990, 1책, 전북대학교 도서관 소장"

      42 "《武科榜目》, 한국학중앙연구원 사이트"

      43 "《承政院日記》, 국사편찬위원회 사이트"

      44 "《慶州金氏忠宣公派族譜》 全, 1989, 국립중앙도서관 소장"

      45 "《律科榜目》, 1책, 하버드 엔칭도서관 소장"

      46 "《川寧玄氏世譜》, 1867, 4권 4책, 천녕 현씨 종친회 소장"

      47 마백락, "〈김범우와 경상도 교회〉, 《가톨릭신문》, 1987. 8. 30 ; 9. 6 ; 9. 13"

      48 "〈庶母金氏墓誌銘〉, 《丁茶山全書》"

      49 "〈平生愚樂總錄〉, 《安和堂私集》, 馬碩麟, 국립중앙도서관 소장"

      50 현은, "〈中人來歷의 略考〉, 현은, 第三 地閥의 不墜, 국립중앙도서관 소장"

      51 김두헌, "19세기 중인의 초혼 연령 및 배우자의 신분 -현탁 가문과 김상순 가문의 사례-" 서울특별시사편찬위원회 (73) : 145-183, 2009

      52 김두헌, "19세기 운학 완천 합격자와 그들의 가계" 전북사학회 (33) : 143-183, 2008

      53 김두헌, "18~19세기 중인 사회의 적서 차별과 공존― 천녕현씨 현계근 가문의 사례" 한국국학진흥원 1 (1): 467-500, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.43
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.42 0.39 1.107 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼