한국판 DSM-5 성격검사(PID-5)의 신뢰도와 타당도 = Reliability and Validity ofthe Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research tested the reliability and validity of The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) - which is based on ‘Pathological personality traits’, the core criterion of DSM-5 Section Ⅲ personality disorder - after translating it into Korean language. The test comprises of 5 domains - negative affect, attachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychoticism - and each domain comprises of 25 detailed facets, and there are total 220 questions (219 in the Korean version).To 607 adults over the age of 18, along with the Korean version of PID-5, the Korean Personality Disorders Test and PSY-5 were conducted. Descriptive statistic analysis, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis were conducted with collected data. As the result of analyses, first, the Korean PID-5 showed appropriate levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Secondly, reviewing the factor structure, the facets of negative affect domains, attachment domains and psychoticism domains were identical to the factor structure of the original. However, the facets of antagonism domains and disinhibition domains were difference to the factor structure of the original. Thirdly, the Korean version’s PID-5 facet showed positive correlation to each personality disorder’s core personality traits. Fourth, the Korean version’s PID-5 facet showed relatively positive correlation with the PSY-5’s related scales. The results above show that, although there are partial differences to the results of preceding overseas research, the PID-5 is measuring the important characteristics of various personality disorders in this country relatively well, and shows the possibility of becoming a tool for evaluating DSM-5 Section Ⅲ personality disorders.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 DSM-5 Section Ⅲ 성격장애의 핵심 준거인 ‘병리적 성격 특질’을 바탕으로 만들어진 DSM-5 성격검사(The Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5)를 한국어로 번안하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 이 검사는 부정적 정서성, 애착상실, 적대성, 탈억제, 정신병적 경향성이라는 5개의 ‘영역(domains)’으로, 각 영역은 다시 25개의 세부적인 ‘양상(facets)’으로 구성되어 있으며, 총 220개(한국판은 219문항)의 문항으로 되어있다. 만 18세 이상의 성인 607명에게 한국어판 PID-5와 함께 성격장애 진단검사, 정신병리 5 요인 척도(PSY-5)를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료로 기술통계 분석, 신뢰도 분석, 탐색적 요인분석, 상관분석을 실시하였다. 자료 분석 결과 첫째, 한국판 PID-5의 내적 일관성과 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 적절한 수준이었다. 둘째, 요인구조를 살펴본 결과 부정적 정서성 영역(domain), 애착상실 영역, 정신병적 경향성 영역의 양상(facets)은 원판의 요인구조와 동일했다. 그러나 적대성 영역과 탈억제 영역의 양상은 원판의 요인구조와 다르게 나타났다. 셋째, 한국판 PID-5 양상은 각 성격장애의 핵심 성격 특질과 정적 상관을 보였다. 넷째, 한국판 PID-5 양상은 PSY-5의 관련 척도와 대체로 정적 상관을 보였다. 이상의 결과는 외국의 여러 선행연구 결과와 부분적으로 차이가 있기는 했으나 PID-5가 국내에서도 다양한 성격장애의 중요한 특징들을 대체로 잘 측정하고 있음을 시사하며, DSM-5 Section Ⅲ 성격장애를 평가할 수 있는 도구로서 가능성을 보여준다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화" 한국임상심리학회 25 (25): 273-288, 2006

2 황순택, "성격장애와 기질 및 성격특질 간의 관계" 한국사회및성격심리학회 29 (29): 1-13, 2015

3 민경환, "성격심리학에서의 비교문화 연구" 79-103, 1996

4 양익홍, "분열형 성격 대학생의 MMPI 반응특성" 11 (11): 123-145, 1997

5 오현숙, "독일과 한국 청소년의 기질 및 성격 특성의 차이" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 14 : 391-407, 2008

6 Zuckerman, M., "What is the sensation seeker? Personality trait and experience correlates of the Sensation-Seeking Scales" 39 (39): 308-, 1972

7 Bagby, R. M., "Validation of the dimensional factor structure of the Personality Psychopathology Five in clinical and nonclinical samples" 16 (16): 304-316, 2002

8 Cattell, R. B., "The scree test for the number of factors" 1 (1): 245-276, 1966

9 Krueger, R. F., "The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology" 10 : 477-501, 2014

10 Harkness A. R., "The Personality psychopathology five(PSY-5) : constructs and MMPI-2 scales" 7 : 104-114, 1995

11 김덕준, "SPSS를 활용한 결측치 처리 방안 비교 분석" 한국비교정부학회 13 (13): 177-196, 2009

12 Fossati, A., "Reliability and Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5)Predicting DSM-Ⅳ Personality Disorders and Psychopathy in Community-Dwelling Italian Adults" 20 (20): 689-708, 2013

13 Arnau, R. C., "Principal components analyses of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales identification of facet subscales" 12 (12): 186-198, 2005

14 Widiger, T. A., "Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder : shifting to a dimensional model" 62 (62): 71-83, 2007

15 Skodol, A. E., "Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5" 25 (25): 136-169, 2011

16 Bernstein, D. P., "Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-Ⅳ personality disorders classification system" 21 (21): 536-551, 2007

17 Anderson, J. L., "On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits" 20 : 286-294, 2013

18 Krueger, R. F., "Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5" 42 : 1879-1980, 2012

19 Biederman, J., "Impact of comorbidity in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder" 65 (65): 3-7, 2004

20 Widiger, T. A., "Five factor model of personality disorder : Integrating science and practice" 39 : 67-83, 2005

21 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" American Psychiatric Association 1994

22 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" American Psychiatric Association 2013

23 최은경, "DSM-5 인격장애에 정신분석적 개념의 진입 시도" 한국정신분석학회 24 (24): 102-110, 2013

24 Hopwood, C. J., "DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-Ⅳ personality disorders" 121 (121): 424-, 2012

25 Spencer, T., "Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbidity" 46 (46): 915-927, 1999

26 Wender, P. H., "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults" Oxford University Press 1995

27 Sellbom, M., "Assessing DSM-5 Section Ⅲ Personality Traits and Disorders With the MMPI-RF" 20 (20): 709-722, 2013

28 Widiger, T. A., "Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder : finding a common ground" 19 : 110-130, 2005

29 Kupfer, D. J., "A research agenda for DSM-V" American Psychiatric Association 2002

30 Horn, J. L., "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis" 30 (30): 179-185, 1965

31 Verheul, R., "A meta-analysis of the prevalence and usage of the personality disorder not otherwise specified(PDNOS)diagnosis" 18 (18): 309-319, 2004

32 Anderson, J., "A comparison of the DSM-5 Section Ⅱ and Section Ⅲ personality disorder structures" 216 (216): 363-372, 2014