Reconsideration of Significant Quantity (SQ) for Pu Based on the Strategic Impact Investigation of Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapon (NSNW) Using Monte-Carlo Simulations

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present multidisciplinary study, which is a nexus of engineering and political science, investigates how the modernization of Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons (NSNWs) affects the IAEA safeguards system based on the likelihood of the use of nuclear weapons. To this end, this study examines the characteristics of modernized NSNWs using Monte Carlo techniques.
The results thus obtained show that 10 kt NSNWs with a Circular Error Probability (CEP) of 10 m can destroy the target as effectively as a 500 kt weapon with a CEP of 100 m. The IAEA safeguards system shows that the Significant Quantity (SQ) of 1 of plutonium is 8 kg, a parameter that was established when strategic nuclear weapons were dominant. However, the results of this study indicate that in recent years, low-yield nuclear weapons such as NSNWs have been more strategically interesting than strategic nuclear weapons as NSNWs require less plutonium than strategic nuclear weapons. Therefore, we would like to conclude that reducing the SQ of plutonium can result in more robust safeguards and non-proliferation strategies.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 J. Malik, "Yields of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Nuclear Explosions" Alamos National Laboratory 1985

2 D. Kimball, "The Nuclear Testing Tally" Arms Control Association

3 K. A. Lieber, "The New Era of Counterforce:Technological Change and the Future of Nuclear Deterrence" 41 (41): 9-49, 2017

4 R. Serber, "The Los Alamos Primer: The First Lectures on How to Build an Atomic Bomb" University of California Press 1992

5 G. I. Taylor, "The Formation of a Blast Wave by a Very Intense Explosion. I. Theoretical Discussion" The Royal Society 201 (201): 159-174, 1950

6 H.M. Kristensen, "The B61 Life-Extension Program : Increasing NATO Nuclear Capability and Precision Low-Yield Strikes" Federation of the American Scientists

7 North Atlantic Treaty Organization, "The Alliance's New Strategic Concept" NATO E-Library

8 P. Schulte, "Tactical Nuclear Weapons in NATO and Beyond: A Historical and Thematic Examination, In Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO" U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute 13-74, 2012

9 H. M. Kristensen, "Russian Nuclear Forces, 2018" 74 (74): 185-195, 2018

10 J.W. Kipp, "Russian Doctrine on Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Contexts, Prisms, and Connections, In Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO" U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute 116-154, 2012

11 J.W. Kipp, "Russian Doctrine on Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Contexts, Prisms, and Connections, In Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO" U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute 127-142, 2012

12 Z. Keck, "Russia Keeps Testing Nuclear Missiles That Could Kill Millions" The National Interest

13 T. B. Cochran, "Plutonium : The International Scene" 35 (35): 211-222, 1996

14 H. L. Brode, "Numerical Solutions of Spherical Blast Waves" 26 (26): 766-775, 1955

15 E. Colby, "Nuclear Weapons in the Third Offset Strategy: Avoiding a Nuclear Blind Spot in the Pentagon’s New Initiative" Center for a New American Security

16 U.S. Department of Defense, "Nuclear Posture Review" U.S. Department of Defense

17 A. A. Broyles, "Nuclear Explosions" 50 (50): 586-594, 1982

18 A. Woolf, "Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons. Congressional Research Service RL32572"

19 H.M. Kristensen, "Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons, Federation of American Scientists Special Report No 3"

20 J. I. Ryu, "Modes of Detonation Wave Propagation in Water Vapor Concentration Gradients" 192 (192): 1910-1930, 2020

21 P. Sonne, "Mattis: Plans for New U.S. Nuclear Weapon Could be Bargaining Chip With Russia" The Washington Post

22 D. MacKenzie, "Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance" MIT Press 1993

23 T. Goorley, "Initial MCNP6 Release Overview" 180 (180): 298-315, 2012

24 International Atomic Energy Agency, "IAEA Safeguards Glossary: 2001 Edition-International Nuclear Verification Series 3" IAEA 2002

25 B. Zala, "How the Next Nuclear Arms Race Will Be Different From the Last One" 75 (75): 36-43, 2019

26 C. Sublette, "Gallery of U.S. Nuclear Tests" The Nuclear Weapons Archive

27 B. Heuser, "Difficult Europeans : NATO and Tactical/Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons in the Cold War" 28 (28): 454-476, 2017

28 J.I. Ryu, "Detonation Initiaion, Propagation, and Suppression" University of California 2018

29 Demographia, "Demographia World Urban Areas 14th Annual Edition (Built‐up Urban Areas or Urban Agglomerations), Demographia"

30 R.L. Elder, "An Examination of Circular Error Probable Approximation Techniques" Air Force Institute of Technology 1986

31 C.N. Kingery, "Air Blast Parameters Versus Distance for Hemispherical TNT Surface Bursts" U. S. Army Materiel Command 1966

32 G. I. Taylor, ""The Formation of a Blast Wave by a Very Intense Explosion-Ⅱ" The Royal Society 201 (201): 175-186, 1945