RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107340760

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose The number of open access (OA) journals is rapidly increasing, and it is very important for librarians to understand the influence of OA journals on the research community. This study investigated the influence of the OA journals listed in Jo...

      Purpose

      The number of open access (OA) journals is rapidly increasing, and it is very important for librarians to understand the influence of OA journals on the research community. This study investigated the influence of the OA journals listed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) based on various indicators.


      Methods

      The data for this study were prepared by combining the JCR 2014 to 2019 journal list with the number of hybrid OA articles obtained by searching the Web of Science. Each journal’s JCR indicators and article processing charge were added. The influence of OA journals was compared according to OA type, whether they were published by large publishers, and whether they were top gold OA journals.


      Results

      Gold OA journals remained weaker in terms of JCR indicators than hybrid journals. However, the top 20 gold OA journals, accounting for 27.0% of all OA articles in JCR 2014 to 2019, were superior in all JCR indicators. The top three OA publishers (MDPI, BioMed Central, and Public Library of Science) showed potential for development despite concerns regarding poor journals. The top three subscription publishers were very active in OA publishing, but their actual share of hybrid OA articles (Elsevier, 5.1%; Springer, 10.1%; and Wiley, 12.4% in JCR 2019) was still insufficient.


      Conclusion

      Some gold OA journals showed high competitiveness and even the possibility for development beyond traditional journals. The transition of subscription journals to hybrid journals was found to be at the early stage. In light of these findings, librarians should continue monitoring the influence of OA journals.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Marques M, "Transitioning to open access : an evaluation of the UK Springer compact agreement pilot 2016-2018" 81 : 913-927, 2020

      2 Aspesi C, "The changing academic publishing industry: implications for academic institutions" Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

      3 김상준, "Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 8 (8): 26-31, 2021

      4 김상준, "Market share of the largest publishers in Journal Citation Reports based on journal price and article processing charge" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 7 (7): 149-155, 2020

      5 김상준, "Influence of the top 10 journal publishers listed in Journal Citation Reports based on six indicators" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 7 (7): 142-148, 2020

      1 Marques M, "Transitioning to open access : an evaluation of the UK Springer compact agreement pilot 2016-2018" 81 : 913-927, 2020

      2 Aspesi C, "The changing academic publishing industry: implications for academic institutions" Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

      3 김상준, "Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 8 (8): 26-31, 2021

      4 김상준, "Market share of the largest publishers in Journal Citation Reports based on journal price and article processing charge" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 7 (7): 149-155, 2020

      5 김상준, "Influence of the top 10 journal publishers listed in Journal Citation Reports based on six indicators" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 7 (7): 142-148, 2020

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-01-30 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Coucil of Science of Editors -> Korean Council of Science Editors KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼