RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      문학개념의 역사적 재구성과 노동자 글쓰기-1830~1850년대 프랑스 노동자들의 텍스트와 전태일의 유고에 대한 비교연구 시론- = The historical reconstitution of literature conception and working class writing-Views upon the comparative study of Jeon Tae-il’s posthumous work and the texts of 1830-1850 French laborers-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107798894

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The 1830-1850’s of France can be seen as a prime era of working class writing, as many laborers produced various types of texts. Starting with the July Revolution in 1830, French laborers began to build their own independent political power and during this process, they absorbed numerous studies and cultural art discussions upon the previous French society, subjectify it in many methods and ways. The process in which the French laborers become the principal actor of realization is equivalent with the process in which they themselves become the main actor of writing. However the texts which French laborers have produced at this time of era shows variety, in that they show mythical imagination and dichotomous class struggling ideologies. Such pluralistic and even mutually heterogeneous characteristics of laborer texts have close relationships with the modern historical reconstitution of literature conception which derived from the collapse of previous classicism literature concepts, also having its correlation with sociology and the cornerstone of modern history. The posthumous work of the 1960s Korean laborer, Jeon Tae-il has many similarities with the texts which French laborers have produced in the mid 19<sup>th</sup> century. In other words, Jeon Tae-il’s writing of variety and difference, is converged to a research towards a new identity as a citizen, a human being and a laborer. However his fragmentary texts show various critical thinking that can not be converged under the literal socio-economical condition of a certain social rank and writing styles at the same time. That is, his work withholds the overall human relationship and portions of society. This paper proposes a hypothesis and conclusion that Jeon Tae-il’s work is a strong agent which historically reconstitutes the stature and characteristic of literature within the Korean society.
      번역하기

      The 1830-1850’s of France can be seen as a prime era of working class writing, as many laborers produced various types of texts. Starting with the July Revolution in 1830, French laborers began to build their own independent political power and duri...

      The 1830-1850’s of France can be seen as a prime era of working class writing, as many laborers produced various types of texts. Starting with the July Revolution in 1830, French laborers began to build their own independent political power and during this process, they absorbed numerous studies and cultural art discussions upon the previous French society, subjectify it in many methods and ways. The process in which the French laborers become the principal actor of realization is equivalent with the process in which they themselves become the main actor of writing. However the texts which French laborers have produced at this time of era shows variety, in that they show mythical imagination and dichotomous class struggling ideologies. Such pluralistic and even mutually heterogeneous characteristics of laborer texts have close relationships with the modern historical reconstitution of literature conception which derived from the collapse of previous classicism literature concepts, also having its correlation with sociology and the cornerstone of modern history. The posthumous work of the 1960s Korean laborer, Jeon Tae-il has many similarities with the texts which French laborers have produced in the mid 19<sup>th</sup> century. In other words, Jeon Tae-il’s writing of variety and difference, is converged to a research towards a new identity as a citizen, a human being and a laborer. However his fragmentary texts show various critical thinking that can not be converged under the literal socio-economical condition of a certain social rank and writing styles at the same time. That is, his work withholds the overall human relationship and portions of society. This paper proposes a hypothesis and conclusion that Jeon Tae-il’s work is a strong agent which historically reconstitutes the stature and characteristic of literature within the Korean society.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼