RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      왕양명(王陽明)과 퇴옹(退翁)의 심성론·수행론 비교 -퇴옹의 양명학 논의를 단서로 한 시론(試論)- = Comparison of Wang Yangming and Toeong Sungchol on their understanding of the Mind appeared in the various materials from Toeong

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107264877

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper aims at studying the mind and performance theory comparatively between Wang Yangming and Toeong Sungchol. Wang Yangming, one of the well known Neo-confucian thinkers during the Ming Dynasty in China, is famous for his understanding of the mind called Shim Hak, while Toeong Sungchol, one of the most famous Seon masters in contemporary Korea, leaves a rich legacy of Korean Seon contemplative meditation tradition especially in the Sudden Awakening and Sudden practice.
      Both Yanming and Toeong, having accomplished their awakening of the mind, started to establish their theory of the mind by philosophically theorizing, systematizing, and storytelling on the basis of their awakening experience. Interestingly there are similar patterns on their way of thinking on the mind and its performance.
      First of all, both are in favor of the Sudden Awakening and Sudden Practice. They both dedicated their life on systematizing as well as philosophically theorizing this perspective on the process of awakening or enlightenment.
      Secondly, both are in favor of the innate goodness of the individuals. While Yanming was following along with the Confucius theory of self suggested by Mencius, Toeong was agree on the Buddha-Nature theory meaning every living creatures have capability to become awakened.
      Thirdly, while Yangming preferred naturalistic as well as literalistic attitude on discipline, Toeong adhered to strict, solemin, and pious attitude on discipline.
      Fourthly, Yangming opened a path for radical dissolution of the conservative Neo-Confucianism, whereas Toeong initiated a mind practice on inner purity among the conservative Korean Buddhists.
      Lastly, there are differences in their understanding of the mind and its performance. While Toeong was silent the discussion on the mind, Yangming caused lots of debate on diverse understanding of the mind in terms of its developments.
      번역하기

      This paper aims at studying the mind and performance theory comparatively between Wang Yangming and Toeong Sungchol. Wang Yangming, one of the well known Neo-confucian thinkers during the Ming Dynasty in China, is famous for his understanding of the m...

      This paper aims at studying the mind and performance theory comparatively between Wang Yangming and Toeong Sungchol. Wang Yangming, one of the well known Neo-confucian thinkers during the Ming Dynasty in China, is famous for his understanding of the mind called Shim Hak, while Toeong Sungchol, one of the most famous Seon masters in contemporary Korea, leaves a rich legacy of Korean Seon contemplative meditation tradition especially in the Sudden Awakening and Sudden practice.
      Both Yanming and Toeong, having accomplished their awakening of the mind, started to establish their theory of the mind by philosophically theorizing, systematizing, and storytelling on the basis of their awakening experience. Interestingly there are similar patterns on their way of thinking on the mind and its performance.
      First of all, both are in favor of the Sudden Awakening and Sudden Practice. They both dedicated their life on systematizing as well as philosophically theorizing this perspective on the process of awakening or enlightenment.
      Secondly, both are in favor of the innate goodness of the individuals. While Yanming was following along with the Confucius theory of self suggested by Mencius, Toeong was agree on the Buddha-Nature theory meaning every living creatures have capability to become awakened.
      Thirdly, while Yangming preferred naturalistic as well as literalistic attitude on discipline, Toeong adhered to strict, solemin, and pious attitude on discipline.
      Fourthly, Yangming opened a path for radical dissolution of the conservative Neo-Confucianism, whereas Toeong initiated a mind practice on inner purity among the conservative Korean Buddhists.
      Lastly, there are differences in their understanding of the mind and its performance. While Toeong was silent the discussion on the mind, Yangming caused lots of debate on diverse understanding of the mind in terms of its developments.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼