주요 해양국가의 수역별 해양관할권 제도 = The Maritime Jurisdictional Systems of the Major Maritime Countries

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper explores the maritime jurisdictional systems of five major maritime countries: the United States, Iceland, Australia, China and Japan, in the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. The reason these five states were chosen for this research, are as follows: (1) The United States, though not having ratified the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), has exerted a large influence on the international maritime legal system through numerous domestic and international practices. (2) Iceland has made every effort to secure and extend its maritime jurisdiction. (3) Australia is one of the states that has taken the lead in managing its maritime jurisdiction efficiently by concluding bilateral agreements with neighboring states. (4) The legal systems and policies of China and Japan may exert a direct influence on Korea’s maritime policy.
This research will delve deeply into the jurisdictional systems of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of the five countries. Doing this, it will also examines on the current maritime issues of these states such as the legality of the straight baseline, the usage of marine scientific research and the extension of the outer limit of the continental shelf.
This paper will also explain and elaborate on the following policies being pursued that have been derived from the maritime jurisdictional systems of the five countries: (1) the active protest against the straight baseline of neighboring states which is not consistent with the obligations set forth by UNCLOS; (2) the trend towards the legalization of the principle of delimitation on the territorial sea and the contiguous zone; (3) the coexistence of the exclusive economic zone and the fishing zone; (4) the trend of stipulation of title to the continental shelf.
Finally, based on the salient issues for Korea and policy implications from this comparative research, this paper makes the following policy proposals for Korea: (1) to protest in various ways straight baselines that are not consistent with UNCLOS; (2) reorganizing the system of the innocent passage; (3) to study the use of the exclusive fishing zone; (3) to analyze the position and the legal basis taken by China regarding the notion of the natural prolongation of the continental shelf.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 영해 및 접속수역
• Ⅲ. 배타적 경제수역
• Ⅳ. 평가 및 정책과제 제안
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "호주 지구과학국 홈페이지"

2 이석우, "해양관할권 관리시스템 구축을 위한 주요 해양국가의 입법상의 노력" 법학연구소 13 (13): 29-60, 2010

3 이석우, "해양경계획정, 분쟁수역관리 및 해양자원개발에 대한 주요 해양국가의 법과 제도" 서울국제법연구원 16 (16): 169-214, 2009

4 이창위, "해양경계 관련 섬에 대한 중국과 일본의 주장 및 타당성 분석" 한국해양수산개발원 113-, 2008

5 "유엔해양법협약 제10조 5항"

6 "미국 상무부 NOAA 홈페이지"

7 연합뉴스, "日, 中 동중국해 가스전 개발강행땐 제소(2010년 2월 22일자)"

8 山本草二, "國際法(新版)" 有斐閣 362-, 1999

9 "http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_isl_27_2009.htm (2010.2.10 최종방문)"

10 "http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/isl27_09/nor_7jul09.pdf (2010.2.10 최종방문)"

11 "http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/isl27_09/isl2009executivesummary.pdf (2010.2.10 최종방문)"

12 "http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/isl27_09/dnk_15jun09.pdf (2010.2.10 최종방문)"

13 "http://www.state.gov/g/oes/continentalshelf/ 2010.3.5 최종방문"

14 "http://www.ga.gov.au/oceans/mc_LawSea.jsp (2010.2.12 최종방문)"

15 "http://www.flipseekllc.com/mmsextendshelf.html (2010.2.10 최종방문)"

16 Dennis L Bryant, "The U.S. Territorial Sea and Other Lines in the Water"

17 Victor Prescoutt, "The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World (second edition)" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 144-, 2005

18 Donald R.Rothell, "The Legal Framework for Ocean and Coastal Management in Australia" 33 : 46-, 1996

19 "Restatement of the Law : The Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Third) Volume 2" American Law Institute Publishers 36-, 1987

20 Robert C.Beckman, "PSSAs and Transit Passage- Australia’'s Pilotage System in the Torres Strait Challenges the IMO and UNCLOS" 38 : 325-357, 2007

21 Zou Keyuan, "Law of the Sea in East Asia: Issues and prospects" Routledge 36-, 2005

22 Sam Bateman, "Compulsory Pilotage in the Torres Strait: Overcoming Unacceptable Risks to a Sensitive Marine Environment" 40 : 184-203, 2009

23 Jeanette Greenfield, "China's Practice in the Law of the Sea" Clarendon Press 86-, 1992

24 Zou Keyuan, "China's Marine Legal System and the Law of the Sea" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 95-, 2005

25 Zhiguo Gao, "China and the Law of the Sea, in Freedom of Seas, Passage Rights and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention" Maritnus Nijhoff Publishers 285-, 2009

26 Gao Jianjun, "A Note on the 2008 Cooperation Consensus Between China and Japan in the East China Sea" 40 : 291-303, 2009