憲法上 辯護人의 助力을 받을 權利 = The Right to the Counsel on the Constitution

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The thesis is studying purport, nature, substance and case of the right to the counsel.
In conclusion, compared with the America, which has similar kind of legal system. some deficiencies have been founded.
Related problems and solutions are as followed.
First, It is not enough that attendance of the defence counsel during investigation of the suspect. Although public finance comes short of that. at least, a court-appointed defense counsel should be joined in examination of a suspect under detention.
Second, the public defender system is not sufficient. A suspect of no resources needs a public defender, so rearrangement of the system is required.
Third, the right of access, reading and transcription, of investigation records is imperfect. With a certain limitation, reading and transcription of investigation records before institution of indictment must be guaranteed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• Abstract = 755
• Ⅰ. 序論 = 755
• 1. 硏究의 目的 = 755
• 2. 硏究의 範圍 = 756
• Ⅱ. 憲法上 辯護人의 助力을 받을 權利의 內容 = 756
• 1. 辯護人의 助力을 받을 權利의 意義와 그 性質 = 756
• 2. 辯護人의 助力을 받을 權利의 內容 = 758
• Ⅲ. 辯護人의 助力을 받을 權利의 判例 = 761
• 1. 日本의 判例 = 761
• 2. 美國의 判例 = 761
• 3. 韓國의 判例 = 763
• Ⅳ. 辯護人의 助力을 받을 權利實現의 問題點과 그 改善方案 = 764
• 1. 被疑者 訊問에서 辯護人 參與의 問題 = 765
• 2. 被疑者의 國選辯護人 制度의 問題 = 765
• 3. 辯護人의 閱覽謄寫權의 問題 = 767
• Ⅴ. 結論 = 767