불교에서 언어에 의한 대상세계 구성의 문제: 유식사상에 나타난 언어적 전회 = Constructing the World through Language in the Yogācāra Buddhism: Linguistic Turn in the Theory of the Three Natures

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is widely known that Indian thought has a fundamental interest in language. Recently, J. Bronkhorst published a series of studies that drew our attention to the relationship between language and objects in Indian thought. In Language and Reality (2011), in particular, he designates this principle as “Correspondence Principle”, and argues that it lay at the root of the thoughts of various schools of the Indian schools for over half a millennium after Nāgārjuna (ca 150-250).
This paper aims to understand whether it is possible to apply his correspondence principle to Buddhist ideas, especially to the Three-Nature (svabhāvatraya) theories of Indian Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda school, and to understand it from the perspective of the so-called “Linguistic turn” in Indian Buddhism. To this purpose, I try to distinguish the Three-Nature theory into two flows. One is an explanation from the perspective of the Noesis-Noema (grāhaka-grāhya) corelation, to use the terminology of Phenomenology, and the other is to apply the perspective of the expression-the expressed (abhilāpa- abhilāpya) relation to the fictive nature (parikalpitasvabhāva). For me, the latter flow could be rightly understood as a linguistic turn in Indian thought.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

인도사상이 언어에 대해 근본적인 관심을 갖고 있다는 것은 널리 알려져 있다. 최근 브롱코스트(Bronkhorst 2011)는 인도사상에 나타나는 언어와 대상 간의 대응관계를 ‘대응원리’(correspondence principle)이라 부르면서, 그것이 용수(Nāgārjuna, ca 150-250) 이후 반천년 동안 인도고전시기의 여러 학파들의 사유의 근저에 놓여있다고 주장했다. 본 논문은 불교사상, 특히 인도유식문헌에 나타난 삼성설에 그의 대응원리를 적용시킬 수 있는지를 검토한 것이다. 여기서는 특히 삼성설 중의 변계소집성의 해석에 나타나는 언어의 대상구성적 측면을 인도사상에서의 언어적 전회(linguistic turn)로서 간주한 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 삼성설을 문헌의 설명에 따라 두 개의 흐름으로 구별했다. 하나는 식의 흐름에 초점을 맞춘 능취(grāhaka)-소취(grāhya)의 관점에서의 설명이고, 다른 하나는 변계소집성의 설명에서 능전(abhilāpa)-소전(abhilāpya)의 관점을 적용하는 설명이다. 나는 유식문헌 일부에 보이는 후자의 해석이 인도사상에서의 언어적 전회에 해당된다고 주장하는 것이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강진호, "촘스키와 비트겐슈타인의 지칭 의미론 비판" 한국철학회 (102) : 109-137, 2010

2 정호영, "초기유식 3성설의 두 형태와 불가분리성" 34 : 2010

3 김재권, "중변분별론에 있어서 3성설의 구조적 특징" 25 : 2008

4 카지야마 유이치 梶山雄一, "인도불교철학" 민족사 1990

5 안성두, "유식학의 법무아 해석과 그 증득 방법" 인도철학회 (56) : 5-36, 2019

6 안성두, "유식문헌에서의 三性說의 유형과 그 해석" 인도철학회 (19) : 61-90, 2005

7 다카하시 고이치, "유식과 유가행" 씨아이알 2015

8 남경희, "언어의 연기와 마음의 사회성" 이화여자대학교출판부 2012

9 안성두, "보살지" 세창출판사 2015

10 사이토 아키라, "공과 중관" 씨아이알 2015

11 Takahashi, Koichi 高橋晃一, "菩薩地『｢眞實義品から｢攝決擇分中菩薩地｣への思想展開" 2005

12 Nagao, Gajin 長尾雅人, "攝大乘論 上" 1982

13 Nagao, Gajin 長尾雅人, "大乘莊嚴經論 和譯と註釋 I-III" 長尾文庫 2007

14 안성두, "『해심밀경』에 나타난 3성설의 해석과 후대 인도-티벳 전통에 끼친 영향" 인도철학회 (44) : 75-126, 2015

15 Bhattacharya, "YBh Yogācārabhūmi"

16 Siderits, Mark, "Word Meaning, Sentence Meaning, and Apoha" 13 : 133-151, 1985

17 Schmithausen, Lambert, "Wisdom, Compassion, and the Search for Understanding: the Buddhist studies legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao" University of Hawai’i Press 2000

18 Aramaki, Noritoshi 荒牧典俊, "Wisdom, Compassion, and the Search for Understanding: the Buddhist studies legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao" 2000

19 Hartmut Buescher, "TrBh Triṃśikābhāșya"

20 "Tr see TrBh"

21 Vetter, Tilmann, "The ‘Khandha Passages’ in the Vinayapiṭaka and the four main Nikāyas" 2000

22 Matilal, Bimal Krishna, "The Word and the World: India’s Contribution to the Study of Language" OUP 1990

23 Sponberg, Alan, "The Trisvabhāva Doctrine in India &China" 22 : 1983

24 Bronkhorst, Johannes, "The Peacock’s Egg: Bhartŗhari on Language and Reality" 51 (51): 2001

25 Schmithausen, Lambert, "The Genesis of Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda : Responses and Reflections" The International Institute for Buddhist Studies 2014

26 Houben, Jan E. M, "The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Tradition" John Benjamins 1997

27 Johansson, Rune E.A., "The Dynamic Psychology of Early Buddhism" 1979

28 "T 大正新修大藏經"

29 Schmithausen, Lambert, "Some Remarks on the Genesis of Central Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda Concepts" 46 : 2017

30 Étienne Lamotte, "SNS Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra"

31 Matsuda, Kazunobu, "Reading Slowly: A Festschrift for Jens E. Brārvig" Harrassowitz Verlag 2018

32 Rorty, Richard, "Philosophy As Cultural Politics" Cambridge University Press 2007

33 Halbfass, Wilhelm, "On Being and What There is" SUNY 1992

34 Conze, Edward, "Melanges d’Indienisme a la memoire de Louis Renou" 1968

35 Nagao, Gajin 長尾雅人, "Mahāyāna Buddhist Meditation" 1978

36 Nagao, "MSg Mahāyānasaṃgraha"

37 Sylvain Lévi, "MSA Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra"

38 S. Yamaguchi., "MAVT Madhyāntavibhāga-Ṭīkā"

39 G. Nagao, "MAVBh MAVBh Madhyāntavibhāga-Bhāṣya"

40 Shulman, Evitar, "Language, Understanding and Reality: AStudy of Their Relation in a Foundational Indian Metaphysical Debate" 40 : 339-369, 2012

41 Bronkhorst, Johannes, "Language and Reality : On an Episode in Indian Thought" Brill 2011

42 Desnitskaya, Evgeniya, "Language and Extra-linguistic Reality in Bhartŗhari’s Vākyapadiiya" 57 : 2018

43 Kramer, Jowita, "Kategorien der Wirklichkeit im frühen Yogācāra" 2005

44 Bronkhorst, Johannes, "Ideology and Status of Sanskrit:Contribution to the history of the Sanskrit language" Brill 1996

45 N. Dutt, "BoBh Bodhisattvabhūmi"

46 Houben, Jan E. M, "Bhartŗhari’s Perspectivism (1): The Vŗtti and Bhartŗhari’s Perspectivism in the First kāṇ.da of the Vākyapadiiya" 59 : 317-358, 1997

47 Lindtner, Christian, "Bhartŗhari: Philosopher and Grammarian" Motilal Banarsidass 1994

48 Houben, Jan E. M., "Bhartŗhari as a ‘Cognitive Linguist’" Motilal Banarsidass 2009