On the Strengthening Effects Affecting Tensile and Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of Low-Alloyed Seismic/Fire-Resistant Structural Steels

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the present study, low carbon ferritic and bainitic steels with different contents of Mo, Ti, and Nb were designed for bothseismic and fire-resistant applications. The microstructure of steels containing 0.3 wt% Mo–0.02 wt% Nb (‘A’ hereinafter)was mainly composed of bainite. By contrast, the microstructure of steels with 0.2 wt% Mo–0.13 wt% Ti (‘B’ hereinafter)consisted of ferrite with a high density of nano-sized (Ti,Mo)-rich MX precipitates. The results showed that the bainiticmicrostructure (‘A’ steel) was quite favorable to high-temperature strength and thermal stability. The yield strength of ‘A’ steelat both room and 600 °C temperatures increased consistently with increasing thermal exposure time (600 °C/200–1000 h),since the precipitation of NbC particles occurred while maintaining bainitic ferrite platelets with a high density of dislocationsduring exposure. In the ‘B’ steel, the formation of nano-sized (Ti,Mo)-rich MX particles was effective to impededislocation movement, leading to excellent plasticity (lower yield ratio) at room temperature. However, their contributionto precipitation hardening was not so much at 600 °C, as compared to the bainitic strengthening. During low cycle fatiguetests at room temperature, the main different feature between the two steels is that the ‘A’ steel showed cyclic softeningwhile cyclic hardening was evident in the ‘B’ steel. The bainitic microstructure showed a better fatigue life due to increasedductility manifested by cyclic softening, by which dislocation cell was developed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 K. P. Bimal, 29 : 59-, 2006

2 P. Verma, 652 : 30-, 2016

3 D. W. Kim, 35 : 24-, 2012

4 O. Bouaziz, 100 : 103-, 2003

5 K. Ma, 62 : 141-, 2014

6 H. Wen, 61 : 2769-, 2013

7 H. K. Kim, 500 : 327-, 2018

8 T. Gladman, 15 : 30-, 1999

9 B. Kim, 68 : 169-, 2014

10 R. Chijiwa, 58 : 47-, 1993

11 G. Della Corte, 38 : 593-, 2003

12 J. G. Speer, China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House 818-823, 2005

13 W. Sha, 20 : 20-, 2004

14 R. Uemori, 76 : 255-, 1994

15 K. Miyata, 41 : 281-, 2001

16 M. Yasushi, 90 : 45-, 2004

17 J. Chen, 28 : 24-, 2007

18 R. Wan, 23 : 2780-, 2014

19 M. Assefpour-Dezfuly, 6 : 1210-, 1990

20 P. Verma, 131 : 244-, 2017

21 R. Wan, 36 : 227-, 2012

22 C. T. Gross, 50 : 209-, 2019

23 J.Y. Kim, Changwon National University 2018

24 W. -B. Lee, 33 : 1689-, 2002

25 R.W. Landgraf, "The Resistance of Metals to Cyclic Deformation, in Achievement of High Fatigue Resistance in Metals and Alloys, ASTM STP 467"

26 Sun-Young Jun ; So-Young Im ; 문준오 ; Chang-Hoon Lee ; 홍현욱, "Technical Issues in Fusion Welding of Reduced Activation Ferritic/Martensitic Steels for Nuclear Fusion Reactors" 대한용접접합학회 38 (38): 47-55, 2020

27 T.H. Courtney, "Mechanical Behavior of Materials" Waveland 2005

28 "JIS A-1304, Method of Fire Resistance Test for Structural Parts of Building"

29 M. A. Mohtadi‑Bonab ; H. Ghesmati‑Kucheki, "Important Factors on the Failure of Pipeline Steels with Focus on Hydrogen Induced Cracks and Improvement of Their Resistance: Review Paper" 대한금속·재료학회 25 (25): 1109-1134, 2019

30 I.D. Bennetts, "Guidelines for Assessment of Fire Resistance of Structural Member" Australian Institute of Steel Construction 1987

31 European Convention for Constructional Steelwork (ECCS), "European Recommendations for the Fire Safety of Steel Structures:Calculation of the Fire Resistance of Load Bearing Elements and Structural Assemblies Exposed to the Standard Fire, ECCSTechnical Committee 3-Fire Safety of Steel Structures" Elsevier 1983

32 Hong Hong Wang ; Zhan Peng Qin ; Xiang Liang Wan ; Ran Wei ; Kai Ming Wu ; Devesh Misra, "Continuous Cooling Transformation Behavior and Impact Toughness in Heat-Affected Zone of Nb-Containing Fire-Resistant Steel" 대한금속·재료학회 23 (23): 848-854, 2017

33 "ASTM E119-82, Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials"