하도급법 상의 징벌적 손해배상제도의 고찰 = A Study of Punitive Damages in Fair Subcontract Transactiom Act

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Punitive damages are to emphasize civil penalties to assaulters commit malice torts, as a unique legal system in Anglo-American law. Purposes of punitive damages are not only punishments but deterrence and precautionary about intended torts. In U.K. appeared punitive damages (That occasion, U.K gave name ‘exemplary damages’.) permit very limited level, and U.S. expanded it continues subjects of debate, dealing with standards of several cases.
It introduced treble damages like punitive damages distinguish other damages with revised Fair Subcontract Transaction Act in Korea. That is to say social efforts for reduction broken out problems when accomplished customary subcontract transaction. We didn’t insist entirety punitive damages, but treble damages role in limited, because it is in principal that primary adopt making up for the deficit about real damages in our civil law as civil liability. It is second reason that technique pirate in our Fair Subcontract Transaction Act resemble to treble damages in Intellectual Property law and The Patent law in U.S. . Finally, we can trace reason from South Korea-United States FTA didn’t accept but U.S. argued triple damages for IPL.
Punitive damages are for appropriate protection method about torts that frequently happen in multiple modern society, and it is nothing question about it.
But as early stage of introduction, there are vague its criterion or penalty. Hence we’ll have to establish this system through study problems with our conflicted legal system and cases in U.S.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 징벌적 손해배상제도
• Ⅲ. 징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입
• Ⅳ. 결론
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재상, "형사소송법(제5판)" 박영사 613-, 1997

2 이재훈, "판례불법행위법(I)" 법조문화사 2-, 1984

3 강지영, "친기업 이명박 정부라 해도 ‘징벌적 손해배상제도’ 도입해야"

4 권용우, "채권각론" 법문사 561-, 1987

5 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 738-, 1993

6 김증한, "채권각 론" 박영사 526-, 1988

7 이점인, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 필요성과 가능성에 대한 일고찰" 동아대학교 법학연구소 38 : 196-,

8 오문완, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 -노동법에서의 논의를 시작하며-" 서울대학교노동법연구회 13 : 12-442, 2002

9 김성천, "징벌적 손해배상제도와 소비자피해구제" 한국소비자보호원 17-18, 2003

10 김도형, "징벌적 손해배상제도 도입에 관한 소고" 경성대학교 법학연구소 17 (17): 190-191, 2008

11 윤정환, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 연구" 한국재산법학회 9 (9): 146-, 1992

12 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상과 법치국가의 원리" 중앙대학교 20 : 218-, 1995

13 김재국, "징벌적 손해배상" 5 : 103-104, 1996

14 노병호, "중국소비자권익보호법" 12 : 35-, 2001

15 황찬현, "손해배상책임에 관한 현행법의 규정과 입법론적 검토" (3) : 331-, 1999

16 송오식, "불법행위법의 새로운 전개" 17 : 210-, 1997

17 송오식, "불법행위법의 새로운 전개" 17 : 210-, 1997

18 박동진, "독일의 민사손해배상법제와 징벌적 손해배상법리" 한국법제연구원 131-, 2007

19 김재중, "대체 형벌로서의 징벌적 손해배상 제도" 한국형사법학회 (26) : 675-696, 2006

20 "경제개혁리포트" 경제개혁 연구소

21 李命甲, "現代不法行爲法論에 관한 硏究" 國民大學校 大學院 1986

22 李命甲, "現代不法行爲法論에 관한 硏究" 國民大學校 大學院 1986

23 石黑一憲, "現代國際私法(上)" 東京大學出版部 497-, 1986

24 田泰弘, "涉外民事事件の實務と問題點" 日本辯護士連蛤膾 31 (31): 22-, 1980

25 "日本最高裁判所 裁時 第1199號"

26 田中英夫, "前揭論文" 164-165,

27 "www.peoplepower21.org/index.php?document_srl=598875&mid=PublicLaw&search_keyword"

28 D. G. Owen, "Punitive Damages in Product Liability Litigation" 74 : 1263-1264, 1976

29 Sales-Cole, Jr., "Punitive Damages : A Relic That Has Outlived Its Origins" 37 (37): 1126-1130, 1984

30 James B. Sales, "Punitive Damagea: A Relic That Has Outlived Its Origins" 37 : 1157-, 1984

31 John C. Coffee, "Paradigms Lost: The Blurring of the Criminal and Civil Law Models-And What Can Be Done About It" 101 (101): 1878-, 1992

32 "Pacific Mutural Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 42"

33 T. Sedgwick, "On Damages" vol. 1 9th ed" 727-,

34 "MBC 추적 60분 2010.07.21"

35 Laurance M. Leshin, "Constitutionall Challanges to Punitive Damages" 40 (40): 1989

36 "BMW of North America v. Gore, 517 U.S.559"