RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      古代 韓國과 古代 日本文化 硏究  :  漢字 硏究와 關連에서 = A Study on the Ancient Korean and Japanese Culture

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30092361

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As a member of the faculty of Sang Myung Women's University, I deem it a great honor for me to contribute an article in the university collection of scholarly theses, and so, to utilize this opportunity, the writer is submitting a summary of a study entitled “Ancient Korea and Ancient Japanese Culture in relation to the study of Chinese Writing.”
      The writer verifies this theses in the ancient bibliographies which were compared and contrasted with the three countries of Korea, China and Japan.
      Though the other theses, the writer has examined the pronounciation, the ideographs and the usage of Chinese characters, and I can conclude that Korean culture in every respect has exerted a beneficial influence upon Japanese culture, that is, ancient Korea had initiated a great culture, the inscription technique, to Japan, and not a simple material civilization.
      The inscriptions of the ancient Japanese language, which means Chinese characters, was not imported directly from China into Japans and the letters which for the first time had been assimilated, fixed and developed in Korea was passed on to Japan, I think, and I deem that the deliverers of the culture were naturalized citizens from Korea living in Japan.
      For that reason, without this passage of this culture from Korea, it would have been impossible for them to edit the “Gosagi and Manyeop collection of writings” in Japanese classical literature and to develop their proper literature.
      Until now, the above thesis is not officially recognized as an established theory in the academic world, but theoretically is perfectly logical, and so I shall be happy to be of any service to you in studying the Chinese pronounciation of ancient Korea and ancient Japanese.

      번역하기

      As a member of the faculty of Sang Myung Women's University, I deem it a great honor for me to contribute an article in the university collection of scholarly theses, and so, to utilize this opportunity, the writer is submitting a summary of a study...

      As a member of the faculty of Sang Myung Women's University, I deem it a great honor for me to contribute an article in the university collection of scholarly theses, and so, to utilize this opportunity, the writer is submitting a summary of a study entitled “Ancient Korea and Ancient Japanese Culture in relation to the study of Chinese Writing.”
      The writer verifies this theses in the ancient bibliographies which were compared and contrasted with the three countries of Korea, China and Japan.
      Though the other theses, the writer has examined the pronounciation, the ideographs and the usage of Chinese characters, and I can conclude that Korean culture in every respect has exerted a beneficial influence upon Japanese culture, that is, ancient Korea had initiated a great culture, the inscription technique, to Japan, and not a simple material civilization.
      The inscriptions of the ancient Japanese language, which means Chinese characters, was not imported directly from China into Japans and the letters which for the first time had been assimilated, fixed and developed in Korea was passed on to Japan, I think, and I deem that the deliverers of the culture were naturalized citizens from Korea living in Japan.
      For that reason, without this passage of this culture from Korea, it would have been impossible for them to edit the “Gosagi and Manyeop collection of writings” in Japanese classical literature and to develop their proper literature.
      Until now, the above thesis is not officially recognized as an established theory in the academic world, but theoretically is perfectly logical, and so I shall be happy to be of any service to you in studying the Chinese pronounciation of ancient Korea and ancient Japanese.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序言
      • Ⅱ. 本論
      • 一, 古代 日本의 漢字音의 由來
      • 一, 新羅, 百濟, 高句麗等 三國과 古代 日本과의 文化交流의 眞相
      • 一, 漢文表記에 있어서의 古代 韓·日關係
      • Ⅰ. 序言
      • Ⅱ. 本論
      • 一, 古代 日本의 漢字音의 由來
      • 一, 新羅, 百濟, 高句麗等 三國과 古代 日本과의 文化交流의 眞相
      • 一, 漢文表記에 있어서의 古代 韓·日關係
      • Ⅲ. 結論
      • 參考後記
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼