RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE

      Validity of Glycated Hemoglobin in Screening and Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Subjects = Validity of Glycated Hemoglobin in Screening and Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Subjects

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60047812

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: The application of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for the diagnosis of diabetes is currently under extensive discussion. In this study, we explored the validity of using HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test in Chinese subjects recrui...

      Background/Aims: The application of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for the diagnosis of diabetes is currently under extensive discussion. In this study, we explored the validity of using HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test in Chinese subjects recruited in Nanjing, China. Methods: In total, 497 subjects (361 men and 136 women) with fasting plasma glucose (PG) ≥ 5.6 mmol/L were recruited to undergo the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c test. Plasma lipid, uric acid, and blood pressure were also measured. Results: Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cutoff point of HbA1c related to diabetes diagnosed by the OGTT was 6.3%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 79.6% and 82.2%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.92). A HbA1c level of 6.5% had a sensitivity and specificity of 62.7% and 93.5%, respectively. When comparing the HbA1c ≥ 6.5% or OGTT methods for diagnosing diabetes, the former group had significantly higher HbA1c levels and lower levels of fasting and 2-hour PG than the latter group. No significant difference was observed in the other metabolism indexes between the two groups. Conclusions: Our results suggest that HbA1c ≥ 6.5% has reasonably good specificity for diagnosing diabetes in Chinese subjects, which is in concordance with the American Diabetes Association recommendations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Manley SE, "Validation of an algorithm combining haemoglobin A(1c) and fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in UK and Australian populations" 26 : 115-121, 2009

      2 Buell C, "Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999-2004 NHANES population" 30 : 2233-2235, 2007

      3 Gregg EW, "Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S" 27 : 2806-2812, 2004

      4 Nathan DM, "Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values" 31 : 1473-1478, 2008

      5 Miedema K, "Towards worldwide standardisation of HbA1c determination" 47 : 1143-1148, 2004

      6 Motta M, "The value of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a predictive risk factor in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the elderly" 50 : 60-64, 2010

      7 Ko GT, "The reproducibility and usefulness of the oral glucose tolerance test in screening for diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors" 35 : 62-67, 1998

      8 American Diabetes Association, "Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010" 33 (33): S11-S61, 2010

      9 Selvin E, "Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes" 167 : 1545-1551, 2007

      10 Ganda OP, "Reproducibility and comparative analysis of repeated intravenous and oral glucose tolerance tests" 27 : 715-725, 1978

      1 Manley SE, "Validation of an algorithm combining haemoglobin A(1c) and fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in UK and Australian populations" 26 : 115-121, 2009

      2 Buell C, "Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999-2004 NHANES population" 30 : 2233-2235, 2007

      3 Gregg EW, "Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S" 27 : 2806-2812, 2004

      4 Nathan DM, "Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values" 31 : 1473-1478, 2008

      5 Miedema K, "Towards worldwide standardisation of HbA1c determination" 47 : 1143-1148, 2004

      6 Motta M, "The value of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a predictive risk factor in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the elderly" 50 : 60-64, 2010

      7 Ko GT, "The reproducibility and usefulness of the oral glucose tolerance test in screening for diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors" 35 : 62-67, 1998

      8 American Diabetes Association, "Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010" 33 (33): S11-S61, 2010

      9 Selvin E, "Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes" 167 : 1545-1551, 2007

      10 Ganda OP, "Reproducibility and comparative analysis of repeated intravenous and oral glucose tolerance tests" 27 : 715-725, 1978

      11 Sabanayagam C, "Relationship between glycated haemoglobin and microvascular complications: is there a natural cut-off point for the diagnosis of diabetes?" 52 : 1279-1289, 2009

      12 Nakagami T, "Is the measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c alone an efficient screening test for undiagnosed diabetes? Japan National Diabetes Survey" 76 : 251-256, 2007

      13 International Expert Committee, "International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes" 32 : 1327-1334, 2009

      14 Herman WH, "Hemoglobin A1c for the diagnosis of diabetes: practical considerations" 120 : 37-40, 2010

      15 Bennett CM, "HbA(1c) as a screening tool for detection of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review" 24 : 333-343, 2007

      16 Friedewald WT, "Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge" 18 : 499-502, 1972

      17 Herman WH, "Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program" 30 : 2453-2457, 2007

      18 American Diabetes Association, "Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus" 34 : S62-S69, 2011

      19 Hu Y, "Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance" 47 : 231-236, 2010

      20 Mohan V, "A1C cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians" 33 : 515-519, 2010

      21 Weykamp C, "A review of the challenge in measuring hemoglobin A1c" 3 : 439-445, 2009

      22 Saudek CD, "A new look at screening and diagnosing diabetes mellitus" 93 : 2447-2453, 2008

      23 Viberti G, "A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT): baseline characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients in North America and Europe" 23 : 1289-1294, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.37 0.26 1.02
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.83 0.73 0.566 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼