자녀양육신탁의 효용과 쟁점 = Child Support Trust in Korea : An Incentive for Child Support Payment

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In constrast to the situation of Anglo-American countries, the child support trust is a rare thing in Korea, despite its long history of trust law. In this article, the author tries to explain the usefulness and structure of the child support trust in terms of Korean trust law. First, the author argues that the child support trust could be used as an incentive for child support payment. At least some of non-custodial parents seems to delay or deny the payments because of concerns that the payments could be used not for the child or children of their broken marriage, but for the custodial parent or her/his newly married spouses or their child or children. If it could be guaranteed that the payment could be used soley for her/his child or children, he/she would be more willing to pay the support. According to the author, the child support trust could provide that guaranty. Second, although in principle, the child support trust should be settled only after the parents agreed to, the author maintains that the family court could order the non-custodial parent to settle the trust for the benefit of the child or children, in certain limited circumstances. Third, the author predicts that the close family member or a friend of the trustor (non-custodial parent) could usually be the trustee of the child support trust, because the size of the trust property is comparatively small, which would make the trust companies less inclined to serve as trustees for the child support trust. Moreover, Capital Market Law of Korea, which provides the minimum standard of capital for the trust business, makes it almost impossible for the lawyers, paralegals or social welfare NGOs to serve as trustees. Therefore, there should be careful assistance by the lawyers for those who are going to serve as trustees, especially in the drafting stage of the trust settlement process.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 자녀양육신탁의 효용
• Ⅲ. 자녀양육신탁의 내용과 쟁점
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤진수, "주해친족법 제2권" 박영사 2015

2 윤진수, "주해친족법 제1권과 제2권" 박영사 [서울] 2015

3 김형석, "양육비청구권을 자동채권으로 하는 상계 ―법적 성질과 관련하여" 한국가족법학회 21 (21): 237-274, 2007

4 김상수, "양육비채권의 이행확보를 위한 직접지급명령제도" 법조협회 58 (58): 5-31, 2009

5 박복순, "양육비 확보제도 개선을 위한 비교법적 고찰" 한국민사법학회 (30) : 121-150, 2005

6 김유미, "양육비 이행확보에 관한 연구" 2 : 1999

7 임채웅, "신탁수익권에 관한 민사집행의 연구" 법학연구소 50 (50): 273-304, 2009

8 한원식, "신탁소득의 납세의무자에 대한 연구" 한국세법학회 19 (19): 245-282, 2013

9 최수정, "신탁법" 박영사 2016

10 이동진, "부모 일방의 타방에 대한 과거의 양육비 상환청구와 소멸시효 ―대법원 2011.7.29.자 2008스67 결정(공2011하, 1635)―" 한국가족법학회 26 (26): 121-162, 2012

11 宍戸万里子, "養育費支払いの履行確保事務の実情と問題点" (747) : 1991

12 道垣内弘人, "預かることと信託" (1164) : 1999

13 民事信託硏究會, "民事信託の活用と辯護士業務のかかかわり" 2009

14 新井誠, "信託法制の展望" 日本評論社 2011

15 李美賢, "信託方式에 의한 資産流動化와 관련된 조세문제" 한국세법학회 9 (9): 37-66, 2003

16 樋口範雄, "アメリカ信託法ノト" 弘文堂 2000

17 Comanor, William S., "The Law and Economics of Child Support Payments" Edward Elgar Pub 2004

18 Morgan, Laura W., "The Child Support Trust" 38 : 2015

19 Eckhardt, Kenneth, "Social Change, Legal Controls, and Child Support: A Study in the Sociology of Law" University of Wisconsin 1965

20 Wallerstein, Judith S., "Second Chances" Ticknor & Fields 1990

21 McMullen, Judith G., "Prodding the Payor and Policing the Payee: Using Child Support Trusts to Create an Incentive for Prompt Payment of Support Obligations" 32 : 1998

22 Rikoon, Robert A., "Managing Family Trusts : Taking Control of Inherited Wealth" Wiley & Sons 1999

23 Chambers, David L., "Making Fathers Pay: The Enforcement of Child Support" University of Chicago Press 1979

24 Helmholz, Richard, "Itinera Fiduciae" Duncker & Humbolt 1998

25 "HM Revenue & Customs"

26 정순섭, "BFL총서(10) 신탁법의 쟁점(제2권)" 2015

27 여성가족부, "2015년 한부모가족 실태조사" 2015