RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      대기업 계열사의 경쟁전략과 자원공유 및 인센티브 시스템의 관계 = 계열사의 성과 및 경영자 만족에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Focusing on subsidiaries of Korean diversified firms, this research investigates the relationships among subsidiaries` competitive strategies, resource-sharing among subsidiaries, and incentive systems, and their interactive effects on subsidiaries` p...

      Focusing on subsidiaries of Korean diversified firms, this research investigates the relationships among subsidiaries` competitive strategies, resource-sharing among subsidiaries, and incentive systems, and their interactive effects on subsidiaries` performance and managers` job satisfaction. By use of questionnaire obtained from the 200 subsidiaries of 30 Korean diversified enterprises (i.e., Groups), empirical analyses are conducted and four hypotheses proposed by Gupta & Govindarajan (1986) are tested. These authors` hypotheses are only partially supported. Empirical results indicate that the interactive effect of subsidiaries` competitive strategy and resource sharing among subsidiaries significantly affects subsidiaries` performance improvement. It is also found that the interaction between resource sharing and bonus pool determination significantly affect subsidiaries` performance. However, the interactive effect of resource sharing and bonus subjectivity does not have a significant effect on subsidiaries` performance improvement. In addition, the relationship between resource sharing and job satisfaction of subsidiaries` managers is found to be positive, which is contradictory to the hypothesis proposed by Gupta & Govindarajan. Possible explanations on these mixed results are provided as follows: i) the possibility that Korean diversified firms are not efficient enough to fit the administrative mechanisms, such as decentralization and bonus subjectivity, to the contextual factors like levels of resource sharing, ii) the possibility that Gupta & Govindarajan`s theory on differentiating administrative mechanisms might be complemented by other theoretical perspectives which argue for homogeneous administrative mechanisms to reduce administrative costs, and iii) the possibility that Gupta & Govindarajan`s argument is too simple to capture the phenomena surrounding the issues analyzed. Finally, suggestions for future research are provided.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼