RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      韓國語 話行動詞의 分析과 分類  :  Analysis and Classification = Speech Act Verbs in Korean

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19564092

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Speech acts are language universal, noncategorial and nondiscrete, whereas speech act verbs are language specific, categorial and discrete. The Korean speech act verbs are typically composed of a two-letter Sino-Korean noun and the native verb hata(e.g. tanen (斷言) hata 'assert').
      Semantic/pragmatic criteria for classifying speech acts include mental attitudes (such as intention, belief and wish) of the speech participants, their participation or nonparticipation in the act expressed in the propositional content and their relative hierarchical status along the axis of power and solidarity, which is in part culture-bound but, otherwise, universal.
      For a systematic and inductive analysis of the Korean non-perlocutionary speech act verbs, eleven semantic types are set up on the basis of the semantic/pragmatic criteria, while thirteen syntactic types of speech act verbs are subcategorized for. By taking into account both the semantic/pragmatic and syntactic characteristics of the sample Korean speech act verbs, seven types of speech acts are posited and about 400 Korean speech act verbs are looked up,analysed and classed into these speech act types:(1) expositives, (2) interrogatives, (3) directives, (4) exercitives, (5) commissives, (6) expressives, and (7) reportives.
      Two problems are noted: subcategorization and overlapping. The subcategorization problem of speech act types is methodological and as such it can be refined and remedied, if found necessary. By contrast, the problem of overlapping, which is evident in the one-to-many correspondences from the domain of speech act verbs to the co-domain of speech act types, is more fundamental; it arises from the mismatch between the discreteness of speech act verbs and the nondiscreteness of speech acts.
      번역하기

      Speech acts are language universal, noncategorial and nondiscrete, whereas speech act verbs are language specific, categorial and discrete. The Korean speech act verbs are typically composed of a two-letter Sino-Korean noun and the native verb hata(e....

      Speech acts are language universal, noncategorial and nondiscrete, whereas speech act verbs are language specific, categorial and discrete. The Korean speech act verbs are typically composed of a two-letter Sino-Korean noun and the native verb hata(e.g. tanen (斷言) hata 'assert').
      Semantic/pragmatic criteria for classifying speech acts include mental attitudes (such as intention, belief and wish) of the speech participants, their participation or nonparticipation in the act expressed in the propositional content and their relative hierarchical status along the axis of power and solidarity, which is in part culture-bound but, otherwise, universal.
      For a systematic and inductive analysis of the Korean non-perlocutionary speech act verbs, eleven semantic types are set up on the basis of the semantic/pragmatic criteria, while thirteen syntactic types of speech act verbs are subcategorized for. By taking into account both the semantic/pragmatic and syntactic characteristics of the sample Korean speech act verbs, seven types of speech acts are posited and about 400 Korean speech act verbs are looked up,analysed and classed into these speech act types:(1) expositives, (2) interrogatives, (3) directives, (4) exercitives, (5) commissives, (6) expressives, and (7) reportives.
      Two problems are noted: subcategorization and overlapping. The subcategorization problem of speech act types is methodological and as such it can be refined and remedied, if found necessary. By contrast, the problem of overlapping, which is evident in the one-to-many correspondences from the domain of speech act verbs to the co-domain of speech act types, is more fundamental; it arises from the mismatch between the discreteness of speech act verbs and the nondiscreteness of speech acts.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼