공시지가와 감정평가가격의 괴리수준에 관한 연구 - 감정평가 사례를 중심으로 = A Study on the Gap between the Officially Assessed Land Prices and an Appraisal Value - Focused on the Property Appraisal Instances -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  1. CONTENTS<BR>  (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES <BR>  We set goal of this study to make an analysis of the gap between an appraisal value and the officially assessed land prices through empirical datum. This study also analyzes that why this gap occurs and what a solution it is, and it offers practical or political point of view in connection with this current.<BR>  (2) RESEARCH METHOD<BR>  This study selects 5cities and counties as sample regions, and it makes analysis of 2.818 of samples (this is the last 5years property appraisal samples) which are chosen on the basis of balance classified by purpose of appraisal. The process of analysis is calculating the gap (Classified by cities scale, a zone of use, a classification of land categories, purposes of appraisal, and years), a standard deviation, the maximum, and the minimum, and then making a statistical analysis of change and size of the gap, F-approval, and analysis of corelation. The result is as follows.<BR>  (3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR>  The result is as follows. First, the gap was revealed as managing regions ＞ agriculture and forestry regions ＞ the green belt zone ＞ residential areas ＞ commercial regions ＞ industrial regions according to a zone of use, and as forests and fields ＞ farms ＞ rice fields ＞ orchards ＞ site, and these results are similar as a hypothesis. On the other hand, the result was revealed as an appraisal for compensation ＞ an appraisal, and this result overthrew the hypothesis which was set up as an appraisal for auction ＞ an appraisal for compensation ＞ an appraisal for mortgage. This fact caused us to entertain strong misgivings that profits of development are not excluded from an appraisal for compensation. Second, the gap between an appraised value and the officially assessed land prices showed that the average of 5cities is 2.43times during 5years. This result also shows indirectly that the gap between provisions of the exiting law and actual works is on a serious level. Third, the gap is increasing annually. The reason why a degree of rising of real price is not reflected well in the officially assessed land prices. Fourth, there is a great difference between the maximum of the gap. This is means that the matter of balance of the officially assessed land prices of separate point are still in existence. Fifth, this study analyzed that the change of years, the difference of a zone of use, the difference of land classification, and others have a close connection with the gap between the officially assessed land prices and an appraised value. Sixth, this study analyzed through t-approval that fluctuation in prices of land usually have a positive correlation with the change of the gap.<BR>  2. RESULTS<BR>  The above analysis and the result of this study present that what problems the system of the officially assessed land prices and the method of land appraisal have and that how we improve these problems. Therefore, this dissertation suggests reform measures on the basis of the result of analysis. They are as follows in short. First, the concept of a reasonable price which is prescribed as the exiting 「Law of public announced of land prices」 should be made clear. In other words, if the policy is determined to lead the officially assessed land prices and an appraised value of land to the current price, the concept should be built up as "Sein" price.<BR>  Second, "The extra factors that influence to the land prices" was excessively stretched. Therefore, it is appropriate to introduce concepts such as "reflection of" other factors for supplement by purpose" or "reflection of other factors for supplement of normalization of prices." and the difference between the level of normal prices and the officially assessed land prices have to be reflected before complete actualization of the officially assessed land prices. Third, according to the r

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
  Ⅰ. 서론
  Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구
  Ⅲ. 공시지가와 감정평가가격의 괴리수준분석
  Ⅳ. 공시지가와 감정평가가격의 괴리 해소방안
  Ⅴ. 결론
  參考文獻
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "현행 지가공시제의 문제점과 개선방안 부동산연구사" 1993

2 "현대부동산학" 법문사 1995

3 "표준지 공시지가의 개념과 법적 성격" 한국감정원 1994

4 "표준지 공시지가 조사·평가 업무요령" 건설교통부·한국감정평가업협회 2001

5 "표준지 공시지가 실무편람" 1999

6 "토지가격 비준표"

7 "외국의 공적 지가제도에 관한 소고" 1994

8 "연구보고서 요약집 2001-2003" 2004.6

9 "부동산학개론 (개정증보판)" 형설출판사 2004

10 "부동산감정평가의 원리" 한국부동산학회 23 : 2004.12

11 "국토연구원 자연분석을 위한 계량적 접근방법" 1981

12 "공시지가제도의 선진화 방향에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 1999.10.

13 "공시지가제도운영 개선방안에 관한 연구" 2000

14 "공시지가의 공신력제고를 위한 제도 개선방안 토지연구 한국토지개발공사" (12) : 1992

15 "공시지가와 실거래가 괴리도의 실증적 연구" 2000

16 "공시지가와 시장가격과의 괴리에 대한 원인분석과 공시지가의 정상화 방안" 1998

17 "공시지가와 개별공시지가에 대한 쟁송수단" 고시연구사 1999.7

18 "공시지가 현실화율의 지역간 차이에 관한 실증분석 : 경부축을 중심으로" 2004

19 "개별공시지가의 효율적 산정을 위한 GIS 적용에 관한 연구" 2000

20 "개별공시지가의 합리적 결정에 관한 연구 : 서울특별시 성북구를 중심으로" 2003

21 "개별공시지가의 운영체계의 개선방안 : 강원도 화천군을 중심으로" 2000

22 "개별공시지가의 검증과 감정평가사의 역할" 한국감정원 (봄) : 1996

23 "개별공시지가와 실거래 가격의 비교분석에 관한 연구 : 부산광역시 사상구 금정구를 중심으로" 2004

24 "개발이익의 발생규모와 영향요인 분석에 관한 연구" 2000

25 "감정평가와 보상법론" 1990

26 "감정평가와 보상법론" 형설 1995

27 "감정평가연구" 2004.6

28 "要說 不動産鑑定評價基準" 住宅新報社 1999

29 "投資不動産の分析と評價" 東洋經濟新報社 1999

30 "Urban Planning and Real Estate Development" UCL Press 1996

31 "The New Approach to Real Estate Appraising" Prentice- Hall Inc 1971

32 "Real Estate Market Analysis" Urban Land Institute 2001

33 "Real Estate" Printice Hill 1995

34 "Principles of Real Estate Management" 1991

35 "Encyclopedia of Real Estate Appraising" Prentice-Hall Inc 1978

36 "Business Strategics for Real Estate Management" IREM 1998

37 "American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers The Appraisal of Real Estate" 19891992

38 "American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers The Appraisal of Real Estate" 1987