RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      통감부 시기 대한제국의 간도문제 인식

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76265599

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The perception of the Gando sovereignty during the Residency-General period can be summarized as follows: First, any practical discussion over Gando during policy consultation between Empire of Korean government and Residency-General rarely occurred, and Empire of Korea hardly attempted to secure its sovereignty over Gando either. The Korean government policy which appeared to concession sovereignty over Gando was from the beginning backward-looking in the sense that it only confirmed the policy proposed by Residency-General.
      Second, the attitude of The Korea Daily News toward Gando appears to be complicated. Its early reports strongly claimed Gando sovereignty and looked to accuse Japan of invading Gando. From early 1908, however, it seemed to have recognized that we have to accept it as a fact that Gando is Chinese territory Because standing up for Japan's Gando invasion would results in concession and justification of Japan's Korea invasion policy, it probably had to change its attitude toward Gando and had to recognize to prevent Japan's Korea invasion.
      The following could be another possibility. As Japan's Korea invasion policy was intensified, Gando became the base for struggle against Japan. In such a situation, Korean people might have thought that independent movement would be easier and safer if Gando were Chinese territory. Put differently, if Gando became Korea territory Korean community would not be formulated there, and thus it could not be the base for independence movement against Japan. It should not be neglected that Gando could be the largest independence movement base during the Japan's colonial period, just because it was Chinese territory.
      번역하기

      The perception of the Gando sovereignty during the Residency-General period can be summarized as follows: First, any practical discussion over Gando during policy consultation between Empire of Korean government and Residency-General rarely occurred, ...

      The perception of the Gando sovereignty during the Residency-General period can be summarized as follows: First, any practical discussion over Gando during policy consultation between Empire of Korean government and Residency-General rarely occurred, and Empire of Korea hardly attempted to secure its sovereignty over Gando either. The Korean government policy which appeared to concession sovereignty over Gando was from the beginning backward-looking in the sense that it only confirmed the policy proposed by Residency-General.
      Second, the attitude of The Korea Daily News toward Gando appears to be complicated. Its early reports strongly claimed Gando sovereignty and looked to accuse Japan of invading Gando. From early 1908, however, it seemed to have recognized that we have to accept it as a fact that Gando is Chinese territory Because standing up for Japan's Gando invasion would results in concession and justification of Japan's Korea invasion policy, it probably had to change its attitude toward Gando and had to recognize to prevent Japan's Korea invasion.
      The following could be another possibility. As Japan's Korea invasion policy was intensified, Gando became the base for struggle against Japan. In such a situation, Korean people might have thought that independent movement would be easier and safer if Gando were Chinese territory. Put differently, if Gando became Korea territory Korean community would not be formulated there, and thus it could not be the base for independence movement against Japan. It should not be neglected that Gando could be the largest independence movement base during the Japan's colonial period, just because it was Chinese territory.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.67 1.012 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼