현대중국어 주어절의 한국어 대응 양상 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis considered aspects of correspondence in Chinese subject clauses and the Korean language. The details are as follows:
First, relevant solutions were presented, with a focus on the definitions, characteristics, scope of Chinese and Korean subject clauses, the position of the clauses in grammatical units, and others.
Second, it looked at characteristics of the nominalizing endings of Korean subject clauses ‘-(eu)m’ and ‘-gi’ or their dependent noun ‘geot’ as well as predication types of matrix sentences including Korean subject clauses.
Third, by choosing example sentences according to classification of types of predicates of matrix sentences including Chinese subject clauses, it selected a sample of Korean and Chinese people and examined aspects of correspondence in the Korean language. As a result, it could be seen that various correspondence forms exist when Chinese subject clauses are translated into the Korean language. There were cases where forms of Chinese subject clauses were completely consistent with those of Korean ones; when predicates of Chinese matrix sentences realize modals (e.g. auxiliary verbs, requesting and imperative verbs, relative verbs, influential verbs), forms of correspondence in the Korean language were forms of clauses indicating condition, purpose, reason, etc.
Finally, it makes suggests as follow-up studies on Chinese and Korean subject clauses as follows:
1. Consideration of aspects of correspondence in Korean subject clauses against the Chinese language
2. A syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic contrastive analysis of predicates of matrix sentences including Chinese and Korean subject clauses
3. A contrastive analysis of main predicates constituents of Chinese and Korean subject clauses
4. Consideration of selection of the case markers ‘-eun/-neun/-i/-ga’ in terms of forms of translating Chinese subject clauses into the Korean language
5. An analysis of the characteristics of an Chinese and Korean according to the target language level in terms of forms of translating Chinese subject clauses into the Korean language

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가며
• 2. 중·한 주어절의 정의와 특징
• 3. 한국어 명사형 어미 ‘-(으)ㅁ, -기’, 의존명사 ‘것’
• 4. 중국어 주어절의 한국어 번역 대응 양상
• 5. 나가며
• 〈參考文獻〉
• 〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 문유미, "현대중국어 주어절과 목적어절 특징 비교" 중국어문학연구회 (84) : 141-162, 2014

2 문유미, "현대중국어 어법단위에 대한 小考 ― ‘절’과 ‘이합사’문제를 중심으로" 중국어문학연구회 (95) : 113-132, 2015

3 채유영, "현대국어 명사형 어미 ‘-음’과 ‘-기’의 연구" 서강대학교 2015

4 김아영, "현대 중국어에서 명사적으로 쓰이는 절의 구조와 특징" 한국중국어문학회 73 : 183-209, 2012

5 황병순, "한정 명사절과 비한정 명사절" 배달말학회 (34) : 5-25, 2004

6 박종한, "한국어에서 중국어 바라보기" 학고방 2004

7 한송화, "한국어 학습자의 명사절 사용 양상과 언어 발달 연구 - 숙달도와 언어권의 차이를 중심으로 -" 한국문학언어학회 (66) : 59-93, 2015

8 동연, "한국어 내포문의 중국어 대응문장 고찰" 38 : 2016

9 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" 박이정 2016

10 박종한, "중한번역연습" 한국방송통신대학교출판부 2010

11 김아영, "중한 및 한중 번역 사례로 본문장 나누기의 전략과 기법" 한국통역번역학회 15 (15): 39-65, 2013

12 박영록, "중국어 내포절(内包节)의 비한정성 논의" 14 : 1996

13 윤병달, "언어와 의미" 동인 2009

14 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" 학연사 2001

15 유현경, "국어 문법 기술과 절의 문제" 한국문학언어학회 (63) : 63-87, 2015

16 이보미, "국어 명사절 형성 표지 ‘-ㄴ/ㄹ지’에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 2015

17 刘丹青, "语法调查研究手册" 上海教育出版社 2008

18 徐思益, "语法研究和探索(四)" 北京大学出版社 1988

19 文有美, "现代汉语主语從句的句法语义研究" 復旦大学 2013

20 石毓智, "汉语的限定动词和非限定动词之别" (2) : 2001

21 杨成凯, "动词作主宾语是汉语的语法特点吗?-汉语语法特点散论之一" (6) : 1991

22 손영재, "'-(으)ㅁ'과 '-기' 명사절 구성 연구" 부산외국어대학교 교육대학원 2002