RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      포저(浦渚) 조익(趙翼)의 『대학곤득(大學困得)』 연구 - 「성의장(誠意章)」을 중심으로 - = The study on Pojue`s 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Po-Jeo(浦渚) Jo-ik(趙翼) is one of the famous Scholars who lived in middle of Chosun Dynasty, He Reinterpreted Congzi(孔子)`s Dae-hak, and wrote named 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk(大學困得)』. This paper is research History and Systems about his book, his opinion about 「誠意 chapter」, and other Scholars`s opinion about his thinking. Po-Jeo raised objections to a most people who lived in Chosun only follow Zhouzi(朱子)`s explication way about Confucian books. this is represent that times start of the academic, which is one-sided. Po-Jeo`s research about Chinese classics of Confucianism, only confirm that the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming`s property, Starter steps staying about research of primarily fact about Chinese classics of Confucianism. Topics discussed in the following summary. He`s 『Dae-hak-sa-ram(大學私覽)』 and 『Dae-hak-yak-sul(大學略說)』 was based on Jeongzi(程子)`s rule of divide section, diveded 經一章 and 經二章, 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』 is accede to 章句 system. Focus on his opinion used 28 ``按說`` and explained, among that 15 is lies in 「誠意 Chapter」. When he has special opinion, use ``竊恐``, this is present his prudence. 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』 is only make up for the weak points, but changed present his opinion. One, In 「誠意 chapter」, he said study of 誠意`s point is lies on never self-cheat(``毋自欺``), preserve of 誠`s way is only removal cheat(``欺``), and self-cheat and cheat is not the others, so forbid self-cheat(``自欺``) is the way removal cheat(``欺``). For about ``如好好色`` and ``如惡惡臭``, he scribe no 用力, is effect from never self-cheat(``毋自欺``). He also said Zhouzi is change ``毋自欺`` and ``二如``` order in text and scribe is not fit Main Text. only use 傳文`s order, can obvious original meaning. two, he finded never self-cheat(``毋自欺``) is not ``爲人```s evidenc from ancient and modern sages`s paper and Zhouzi`s mail, and find some fact in 『Sim-gyeong-bu-ju(心經附註)』, said Zhouzi`s explication in this book is only temporary opinion. Three, ``獨``is express ``獨處`` and ``獨知```s meaning, so ``愼其獨```s ``獨`` is can`t only said ``獨知``. four, ``克己復禮```s ``己`` is compare ``意``, ``復`` is compare ``誠``, prove ``克己`` is overcome selfish desire, so in ``毋自欺`` cheat target is not others but self. Po-Jeo`s opinion make a many criticism at that time and after ages. Yun-zeung(尹拯) is about Po-Jeo`s 『gon-deuk(困得)』 set high value, said exist strength and weakness, only take strength. Woo-am(尤庵) also said Zhouzi is the leading expert Schlor after Congzi, but also said Who is most expert in one area, can have not thinkings theory. Choi-seok-jung(崔錫鼎) is severe criticism about Jo-ik`s 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』 and Lee-eon-jeok(李彦迪)`s 『Gae-geong- dae-hak(改定大學)』, especially 『gon-deuk』. Po-Jeo also wrote 「Dae-hak- gon- deuk-hoo-seol(大學困得後說)」, said Zhouzi is give his whole mind to explication 『Dae-hak』 and he agree set high value Zhouzi`s study, but his research also have a good value. He announced real admire ancient sages`s way is accordance with their achievements, effort to research real principle.
      번역하기

      Po-Jeo(浦渚) Jo-ik(趙翼) is one of the famous Scholars who lived in middle of Chosun Dynasty, He Reinterpreted Congzi(孔子)`s Dae-hak, and wrote named 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk(大學困得)』. This paper is research History and Systems about his boo...

      Po-Jeo(浦渚) Jo-ik(趙翼) is one of the famous Scholars who lived in middle of Chosun Dynasty, He Reinterpreted Congzi(孔子)`s Dae-hak, and wrote named 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk(大學困得)』. This paper is research History and Systems about his book, his opinion about 「誠意 chapter」, and other Scholars`s opinion about his thinking. Po-Jeo raised objections to a most people who lived in Chosun only follow Zhouzi(朱子)`s explication way about Confucian books. this is represent that times start of the academic, which is one-sided. Po-Jeo`s research about Chinese classics of Confucianism, only confirm that the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming`s property, Starter steps staying about research of primarily fact about Chinese classics of Confucianism. Topics discussed in the following summary. He`s 『Dae-hak-sa-ram(大學私覽)』 and 『Dae-hak-yak-sul(大學略說)』 was based on Jeongzi(程子)`s rule of divide section, diveded 經一章 and 經二章, 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』 is accede to 章句 system. Focus on his opinion used 28 ``按說`` and explained, among that 15 is lies in 「誠意 Chapter」. When he has special opinion, use ``竊恐``, this is present his prudence. 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』 is only make up for the weak points, but changed present his opinion. One, In 「誠意 chapter」, he said study of 誠意`s point is lies on never self-cheat(``毋自欺``), preserve of 誠`s way is only removal cheat(``欺``), and self-cheat and cheat is not the others, so forbid self-cheat(``自欺``) is the way removal cheat(``欺``). For about ``如好好色`` and ``如惡惡臭``, he scribe no 用力, is effect from never self-cheat(``毋自欺``). He also said Zhouzi is change ``毋自欺`` and ``二如``` order in text and scribe is not fit Main Text. only use 傳文`s order, can obvious original meaning. two, he finded never self-cheat(``毋自欺``) is not ``爲人```s evidenc from ancient and modern sages`s paper and Zhouzi`s mail, and find some fact in 『Sim-gyeong-bu-ju(心經附註)』, said Zhouzi`s explication in this book is only temporary opinion. Three, ``獨``is express ``獨處`` and ``獨知```s meaning, so ``愼其獨```s ``獨`` is can`t only said ``獨知``. four, ``克己復禮```s ``己`` is compare ``意``, ``復`` is compare ``誠``, prove ``克己`` is overcome selfish desire, so in ``毋自欺`` cheat target is not others but self. Po-Jeo`s opinion make a many criticism at that time and after ages. Yun-zeung(尹拯) is about Po-Jeo`s 『gon-deuk(困得)』 set high value, said exist strength and weakness, only take strength. Woo-am(尤庵) also said Zhouzi is the leading expert Schlor after Congzi, but also said Who is most expert in one area, can have not thinkings theory. Choi-seok-jung(崔錫鼎) is severe criticism about Jo-ik`s 『Dae-hak-gon-deuk』 and Lee-eon-jeok(李彦迪)`s 『Gae-geong- dae-hak(改定大學)』, especially 『gon-deuk』. Po-Jeo also wrote 「Dae-hak- gon- deuk-hoo-seol(大學困得後說)」, said Zhouzi is give his whole mind to explication 『Dae-hak』 and he agree set high value Zhouzi`s study, but his research also have a good value. He announced real admire ancient sages`s way is accordance with their achievements, effort to research real principle.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼