RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104351125

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), arterial pressure waveform-based CO estimation (APCO), and transesophageal Doppler ultrasound technique (UCCO) according to the vessel anastomosis sites.
      Methods: This study was prospectively performed in 25 patients who would be undergoing elective OPCAB. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at the following time points: during left anterior descending (LAD) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min; during obtuse marginal (OM) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min: and during right coronary artery (RCA) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min. The variables measured including the SCO, CCO, APCO, and UCCO.
      Results: CO measurement techniques showed different correlations according to vessel anastomosis site. However, the percent error observed was higher than the value of 30% postulated by the criteria of Critchley and Critchley during all study periods for all CO measurement techniques.
      Conclusions: In the beating heart procedure, SCO, CCO and APCO showed different correlations according to the vessel anastomosis sites and did not agree with UCCO. CO values from the various measurement techniques should be interpreted with caution during OPCAB.
      번역하기

      Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), a...

      Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), arterial pressure waveform-based CO estimation (APCO), and transesophageal Doppler ultrasound technique (UCCO) according to the vessel anastomosis sites.
      Methods: This study was prospectively performed in 25 patients who would be undergoing elective OPCAB. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at the following time points: during left anterior descending (LAD) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min; during obtuse marginal (OM) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min: and during right coronary artery (RCA) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min. The variables measured including the SCO, CCO, APCO, and UCCO.
      Results: CO measurement techniques showed different correlations according to vessel anastomosis site. However, the percent error observed was higher than the value of 30% postulated by the criteria of Critchley and Critchley during all study periods for all CO measurement techniques.
      Conclusions: In the beating heart procedure, SCO, CCO and APCO showed different correlations according to the vessel anastomosis sites and did not agree with UCCO. CO values from the various measurement techniques should be interpreted with caution during OPCAB.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), arterial pressure waveform-based CO estimation (APCO), and transesophageal Doppler ultrasound technique (UCCO) according to the vessel anastomosis sites.
      Methods: This study was prospectively performed in 25 patients who would be undergoing elective OPCAB. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at the following time points: during left anterior descending (LAD) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min; during obtuse marginal (OM) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min: and during right coronary artery (RCA) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min. The variables measured including the SCO, CCO, APCO, and UCCO.
      Results: CO measurement techniques showed different correlations according to vessel anastomosis site. However, the percent error observed was higher than the value of 30% postulated by the criteria of Critchley and Critchley during all study periods for all CO measurement techniques.
      Conclusions: In the beating heart procedure, SCO, CCO and APCO showed different correlations according to the vessel anastomosis sites and did not agree with UCCO. CO values from the various measurement techniques should be interpreted with caution during OPCAB.
      번역하기

      Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), a...

      Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), arterial pressure waveform-based CO estimation (APCO), and transesophageal Doppler ultrasound technique (UCCO) according to the vessel anastomosis sites.
      Methods: This study was prospectively performed in 25 patients who would be undergoing elective OPCAB. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at the following time points: during left anterior descending (LAD) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min; during obtuse marginal (OM) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min: and during right coronary artery (RCA) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min. The variables measured including the SCO, CCO, APCO, and UCCO.
      Results: CO measurement techniques showed different correlations according to vessel anastomosis site. However, the percent error observed was higher than the value of 30% postulated by the criteria of Critchley and Critchley during all study periods for all CO measurement techniques.
      Conclusions: In the beating heart procedure, SCO, CCO and APCO showed different correlations according to the vessel anastomosis sites and did not agree with UCCO. CO values from the various measurement techniques should be interpreted with caution during OPCAB.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이지연, "심장 수술 중 폐동맥 카테터를 이용한 지속적인 심박출량 감시의 정확성" 대한마취통증의학회 54 (54): 603-608, 2008

      2 de Waal EE, "Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device" 35 : 1904-1909, 2007

      3 Laupland KB, "Utility of esophageal Doppler as a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitor: a review" 49 : 393-401, 2002

      4 Lorsomradee S, "Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform" 21 : 636-643, 2007

      5 Dark PM, "The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults" 30 : 2060-2066, 2004

      6 Connors AF Jr, "The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators" 276 : 889-897, 1996

      7 Bland JM, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement" 1 : 307-310, 1986

      8 Böttiger BW, "Semi-continuous versus injectate cardiac output measurement in intensive care patients after cardiac surgery" 22 : 312-318, 1996

      9 Schober P, "Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology" 109 : 340-353, 2009

      10 Spahn DR, "Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation" 4 : 46-59, 1990

      1 이지연, "심장 수술 중 폐동맥 카테터를 이용한 지속적인 심박출량 감시의 정확성" 대한마취통증의학회 54 (54): 603-608, 2008

      2 de Waal EE, "Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device" 35 : 1904-1909, 2007

      3 Laupland KB, "Utility of esophageal Doppler as a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitor: a review" 49 : 393-401, 2002

      4 Lorsomradee S, "Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform" 21 : 636-643, 2007

      5 Dark PM, "The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults" 30 : 2060-2066, 2004

      6 Connors AF Jr, "The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators" 276 : 889-897, 1996

      7 Bland JM, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement" 1 : 307-310, 1986

      8 Böttiger BW, "Semi-continuous versus injectate cardiac output measurement in intensive care patients after cardiac surgery" 22 : 312-318, 1996

      9 Schober P, "Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology" 109 : 340-353, 2009

      10 Spahn DR, "Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation" 4 : 46-59, 1990

      11 Boldt J, "Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient?" 22 : 1913-1918, 1994

      12 Nishikawa T, "Hemodynamic status susceptible to slowing of heart rate during thermodilution cardiac output determination in anesthetized patients" 18 : 841-844, 1990

      13 Odenstedt H, "Descending aortic blood flow and cardiac output: a clinical and experimental study of continuous oesophageal echo-Doppler flowmetry" 45 : 180-187, 2001

      14 Thrush D, "Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods" 9 : 399-404, 1995

      15 Bein B, "Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output" 18 : 185-189, 2004

      16 Singh A, "Comparison of continuous, stat, and intermittent cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery" 16 : 186-190, 2002

      17 "Comparison of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis with Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing Elective Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery" Elsvier Inc 24 (24): 767-771, 2010

      18 Moxon D, "Clinical evaluation of the HemoSonic monitor in cardiac surgical patients in the ICU" 31 : 408-411, 2003

      19 Button D, "Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery" 99 : 329-336, 2007

      20 "Change in right ventricular function during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery" 25 : 572-577, 2004

      21 Mehta Y, "Cardiac output monitoring: comparison of a new arterial pressure waveform analysis to the bolus thermodilution technique in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery" 22 : 394-399, 2008

      22 de Waal EE, "Cardiac output monitoring" 22 : 71-77, 2009

      23 Biais M, "Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis" 106 : 1480-1486, 2008

      24 Lafanechère A, "Cardiac output measurement during infrarenal aortic surgery: echo-esophageal Doppler versus thermodilution catheter" 20 : 26-30, 2006

      25 Chand R, "Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery" 20 : 315-319, 2006

      26 Mayer J, "Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device" 106 : 867-872, 2008

      27 Lucchetti V, "Beating heart coronary revascularization without metabolic myocardial damage" 14 : 443-444, 1998

      28 Mathison M, "Analysis of hemodynamic changes during beating heart surgical procedures" 70 : 1355-1360, 2000

      29 Opdam HI, "A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system" 33 : 344-349, 2007

      30 Critchley LA, "A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques" 15 : 85-91, 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼