1960년대 한국문학의 분기 현상 = A study on diverging phenomenon of Korean Literary in 1960`s

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Any age and literature reflected society and society have been imitated. Literature are fed up with diagnosis and prescription about those days reality, the dream of the community for the future. Modern literature which can be linguistic art abut dimension of capitalist life has been divided into various aspects was due to literary property. It was very closely connected between the foundation of social life and literature. A variety of eruption that was distinguished fro and era before in literary history occurred in the 1930s and the 1960s. Japan`s capital is monopoly was introduced to Korea to overcome the global economic crisis in 1930s and a capitalistic economic system of disabled form were formed. With factories were built and the city was formed, the feudal caste system became modern social hierarchy society suddenly and the logic of market capitalism were formed. Korea literature in 1930`s that had a preoccupation or reflected such a social differentiation phenomenon made it possible various experiments of the aesthetic form. It is time to spilt of emotion in Korea literature in 1960s like 1930s. A model of modernization in Korea can seek to antagonism between a spiritualism series of 4.19 and a descriptivism series of 5.16. Confrontation and Conflict between protege forces of 4.19 who were free from the oppression of all authority that was liberation of the modernity and protege forces of 5.16 who sought to maximize productivity to be based on instrumental rationality that was technology of modernity. Although, collaboration and antagonism between two series raised the new sensitivities and was possible the linguistic division of emotional things. And then, the literary spectrum in this time could be very wide and glamorous. Characteristics of intellectual history of Korean literature in 1960s were, first, the spirit of rationality and freedom settled in intellectuals society, and then it had been enabled the birth of literary subject by modern critical intelligence. Novels of Choi In-hoon, Kim Jeong-han, Lee cheong-joon and poems of Kim Soo-young, Shin Dong-yeop showed the self-awareness for each individual and ethnic entities. Secondary, the advent of the Hangul generation and new sensibility were done extensively manifestations and allowed the divide subject`s birth who had caused a split in language of emotional things. Popularly known as the 4.19 generation, these young writers had confidence in the autonomy of literature to based on a through awareness of language. They are divided into two antagonistic conflict to ‘Moon-ji’ series who were based on a aesthetic autonomy and a modern individualism and ‘Chang-bi’ series who valued social modernity and targeted the problem of literary practice, through this, they expanded the amplitude of the literature. Lastly, the point is that the real meaning of the capitalistic system of life began to be built in Korean society from 1960s. Strongly propelled Modernization project by development dictatorship was accelerating industrialization, urbanization of our society. In this process, traditional order and thinking way were destroyed, and a new way of splitting the sensitivity was to emerge.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임환모, "한국 현대소설의 서사성과 근대성" 태학사 2008

2 사월혁명연구소, "한국 사회변혁운동과 4월혁명" 한길사 1990

3 이현우, "폭력이란 무엇인가" 난장이 2011

4 들뢰즈, 질, "의미의 논리" 한길사 1999

5 "신동엽전집" 창작과비평사 1985

6 김형중, "살아 있는 시체들의 밤" 문학과지성사 2013

7 김현, "비평의 유형학을 향하여" (봄) : 1985

8 김현, "분석과 해석" 문학과지성사 1992

9 김성기, "모더니티란 무엇인가" 민음사 1994

10 이숭원, "논문으로 읽는 문학사 2" 소명출판사 2008

11 정과리, "김현비평의 현재성" (여름) : 2000

12 이마무라 히토시, "근대성의 구조" 민음사 1999

13 랑시에르, 자크, "감성의 분할" 도서출판 b 2008

14 신동엽, "60년대 시단 분포도"

15 함석헌, "5ㆍ16을 어떻게 볼까?"

16 최원식, "4월혁명과 한국문학" 창작과비평사 2002

17 우찬제, "4ㆍ19와 모더니티" 문학과지성사 2010

18 권보드래, "1960년을 묻다 - 박정희 시대의 문화정치와 지성" 천년의상상 2012

19 박태순, "1960년대의 사회운동" 까치 1991

20 민족문학사연구소 현대문학분과, "1960년대 문학연구" 깊은샘 1998