Overlapping ambiguous strings refers to the words in which middle character can constitute words with the characters to both their left and right, such as “按时/装” and “按/时装”. This study investigated whether the inter-word space, a s...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105971466
2018
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
47-72(26쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Overlapping ambiguous strings refers to the words in which middle character can constitute words with the characters to both their left and right, such as “按时/装” and “按/时装”. This study investigated whether the inter-word space, a s...
Overlapping ambiguous strings refers to the words in which middle character can constitute words with the characters to both their left and right, such as “按时/装” and “按/时装”. This study investigated whether the inter-word space, a space between the words, can affect the efficiency in Chinese reading by Korean-speaking CSL (Chinese as a second language) learners with the eye tracking technique. CSL learners of different proficiency levels (intermediate and advanced) and native Chinese readers were asked to read Chinese sentences of overlapping ambiguous strings with and without inter-word spaces. The results showed that the inter-word space had a facilitating effect on Chinese sentences reading. The global analysis showed that despite the longer physical length of the sentences with inter-word space, both CSL and native readers spent significantly less reading time and had significantly less mean fixation duration when they read under spaced condition. The local analysis showed similar results that participants spent significantly less reading time and significantly less fixation count than the no space condition. Furthermore, the facilitating effects were similar among the CSL readers of different proficiency.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 남기심, "표준국어문법론" 탑출판사 1992
2 임지룡, "국어 의미론" 탑출판사 1993
3 陈凡凡, "试析句子阅读中的分次加工——含“交集歧义”语段的非歧义句二语习得实验研究" 云南师范大学 (3) : 2008
4 韩美爱, "词间空格对韩国学习者汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 北京语言大学 2017
5 高 珊, "词边界对第二语言学习者汉语阅读的影响" 北京语言大学 (4) : 2015
6 李 馨, "词边界信息和词频在汉语阅读中的作用" 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基础天津师大心理与行为研究中心 (2) : 2011
7 田 瑾, "词切分对韩国、泰国留学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 天津师范大学 2009
8 白学军, "词切分对老年人阅读效率促进作用的眼动心理" 中国老年学学会 (6) : 2012
9 白学军, "词切分对美国留学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 河南大学 (5) : 2010
10 白学军, "词切分对美国大学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 南开大学文学院 (1) : 2009
1 남기심, "표준국어문법론" 탑출판사 1992
2 임지룡, "국어 의미론" 탑출판사 1993
3 陈凡凡, "试析句子阅读中的分次加工——含“交集歧义”语段的非歧义句二语习得实验研究" 云南师范大学 (3) : 2008
4 韩美爱, "词间空格对韩国学习者汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 北京语言大学 2017
5 高 珊, "词边界对第二语言学习者汉语阅读的影响" 北京语言大学 (4) : 2015
6 李 馨, "词边界信息和词频在汉语阅读中的作用" 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基础天津师大心理与行为研究中心 (2) : 2011
7 田 瑾, "词切分对韩国、泰国留学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 天津师范大学 2009
8 白学军, "词切分对老年人阅读效率促进作用的眼动心理" 中国老年学学会 (6) : 2012
9 白学军, "词切分对美国留学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 河南大学 (5) : 2010
10 白学军, "词切分对美国大学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究" 南开大学文学院 (1) : 2009
11 沈德立, "词切分对初学者句子阅读影响的眼 动研究" 中国心理学会 (2) : 2010
12 李馨, "空格在文本阅读中的作用" 中国科学院心理研究所 (9) : 2010
13 闫国利, "眼动研究心理学导论:揭开心灵之窗奥秘的神奇科学" 科学出 版社 2012
14 国家汉语水平考试委员会办公室考试中心, "汉语水平词汇与汉字等级大纲" 经济 科学出版社 2001
15 江 新, "拼音文字背景的外国学生汉字书写错误研究" 世界汉语教学学会 (1) : 2004
16 高 阳, "小学生阅读能力影响因素的研究" 山东省教育学会 (10) : 2012
17 袁嘉, "对外汉语教学中的"骑马词"问题" 西南民族 (6) : 1996
18 荀恩东, "大数据背景下BCC语料库的研制" 北京外国语大学中国外语教育研究中心 (1) : 2016
19 袁子渊, "北京地区对外汉语教学 研究生论坛论文集" 北京大学对外汉语教育学院 2013
20 梁菲菲, "切分空间和切分方式对中文阅读绩效影响的眼动研究" 河南大学 (1) : 2010
21 臧传丽, "儿童和成人阅读中的眼动控制:词边界信息的作用" 天津师范大学 2010
22 梁南元, "书面汉语自动分词系统———CDWS" 中国科学院软件研究所 (2) : 1987
23 李兴珊, "中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评" 中国科学院心理研究所 (4) : 2011
24 张兰兰, "不同语法知识掌握水平对中文词切分的影响" 天津师范大学 2009
25 杨万兵, "不同水平留学生汉语切分歧义识别实验研究" 北京语言大学 (3) : 2012
26 杨万兵, "不同水平留学生汉语交集型与组合型切分歧义识别实验研究" 徐州师范大学语言所 (3) : 2016
27 Ma, G. J., "Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading" 40 (40): 1046-1059, 2014
28 Rayner, K., "Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control" 38 : 1129-1144, 1998
29 Stanovich, K. E., "Toward an Interactive-Compensatory Model of Individual Differences in the Development of Reading Fluency" 16 (16): 32-71, 1980
30 Inhoff, A. W., "The role of spatial information in the reading of complex words" 7 : 121-138, 2002
31 Sainio, M., "The role of interword spacing in reading Japanese : An eye movement study" 47 : 2575-2584, 2007
32 Perea, M., "Space information is important for reading" 49 : 1994-2000, 2009
33 Rayner, K., "Reading unspaced text is not easy : Comments on the implications of Epelboim et al. ’s study for models of eye movement control in reading" 36 : 461-465, 1996
34 Bai, X. J., "Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text : Evidence from eyemovements" 34 : 1277-1287, 2008
35 Yan, M., "Flexible saccade target selection in Chinese reading" 63 : 705-725, 2010
36 Inhoff, A. W., "Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading" 33 : 1345-1356, 2005
37 Li, X. S., "Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading" 2010
38 Pollatsek, A., "Eye movement control in reading : The role of word boundaries" 8 : 817-833, 1982
39 Inhoff, A. W., "Complex compounds in German : Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning" 42 : 23-50, 2000
40 Rumelhart, D. E., "Attention and Performance VI" Erlbaum 1977
41 Kohsom, C., "Adding spaces to Thai and English : Effects on reading" 19 : 388-393, 1997
중국어 독해 교재 집필 현황 분석 -2010년 이후 국내 출판 교재에 대한 정량 분석을 중심으로-
“把”字句【S+把+O+V+在/到+地方】格式中动词语 义特征对介词“在/到”选择的限定作用分析 -从韩国学生的“把”字句偏误谈起
중등 교육과정 중국어 의사소통 기능 항목 체계의 적절성에 대한 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2028 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2022-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2015-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | |
2011-11-03 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Chinese Teaching and Studies -> Chinese Language Education and Research | |
2011-08-10 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : The Korea Association of Chinese Teaching -> Korea Association of Chinese Language Education | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2008-06-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 중국어교육학회 -> 한국중국어교육학회영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korea Association of Chinese Teaching | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.3 | 0.34 | 0.472 | 0 |