‘연암(燕巖)’이라는 고전의 형성과 그 기원(1) = The origins and development of the classic, 'Yeonam(燕巖)' : Focusing on how Ji-Won Park is cited between the late 19th century and early 20th century

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Yeonam Ji-Won Park is widely remembered as a practical scientist and as a author of social criticism. Until now, 'Yeonam' along with other Practical scientists, represented modern way of thinking and also hallmarked the existence of the 'novelist', which entails an independent literature. This work seeks to examine the mechanism in the context and circumstance in which 'Yeonam' had developed into a classic.
Yeonam's contemporaries of the 18th century who had interchanged with him and experienced his writings and thoughts all agree that he "opened a new frontier". The impact that his creative style and thinking had seems to be much more significant than could be imagined now. His works had been Heavily cited and referenced not only because of its fresh ingenuity, but also due to the great amount of knowledge they held.
In the year 1900, almost 100 years after Yeonam's death, Chang-gang Taek-Young Kim published Yeonamjip twice, branding himself as a writer and ancient writing scholar superior to Yeonam. Maechon Hwang Hyun, who composed his own works to coincide with the publication of Yeonamjip showed a breakthrough in understanding through the example of Yeonam that there is not an orthodox way to literary absolution.
Around 1910, Nam-Seon Cheo started a movement to excavate, preserve, and distribute Chosun's classics and to him, Yeonam's classics represented the very essence of civilized Chosun, Nam-Seon Cheo started a movement to excavate, preserve, and distribute Chosun's classics of 1910 and to him. Yeonam's classics represented the very essence of civilized Chosun.
course, this was based on a nationalistic ideology and served a practical purpose. The question of what it is of Yeonam's works constitute the value of classics, had not been addressed. During the period leading to the 1920's.
the works of Yeonam, oft limited by its era and complex language, had been closely analyzed, proofread, punctuated and amended to a form easy to the public
In the 1930's Korean literature scholar Ki-Moon Hong, through 7 papers commenting on Park Ji won's art and thoughts, cited Park as the best literary artist of the Chosun and the Chinese cultural area. Hong, elevated Yeonam from a "classicist" to "The Polaris of Chosun literature". Other of the 1930's In-Bo Jeong, Tae-Jun Kim definitely cited and expressed "Yeonam" the way Ki-Moon Hong did. Hong showed Yeonam as the greatest man of east asia emphasizing his harsh criticism and satire of society, and his folklore of Chosun. Tae-Jun Kim showed Yeonam as Chosun's literary master and as a modern literaty genious and novelist. This is when the idea of 'Yeonam', who we recognize as a nocelist and practical scientist, had been born.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김영복, "홍기문 조선문화론선집" 현대실학사 1996

2 강명관, "한 지식인의 독서체험과 조선후기 문학-흠영에 대하여, 우리 한문학과 일상문화" 소명출판사 2007

3 하루오 시라네, "창조된 고전" 소명출판사 2003

4 차원현, "정전과 동원-1960~70년 역사물을 중심으로" 민족문학사학회 34 (34): 114-146, 2007

5 전영표, "육당 최남선의 출판행위와 ≪소년≫지 연구" 출판문화학회 12 : 5 -21, 2004

6 김성칠, "옛사람들의 文集校正-熱河日記의 경우" 3 : 192-206, 1993

7 김명호, "열하일기 연구" 창작과비평사 1990

8 임형택, "연암(燕巖) 관계자료" 한국한문학회 11 : 122-263, 1988

9 강동엽, "연암 (燕巖) 박지원 (朴趾源) 선생 탄진 (誕辰) 250주년기념 학술회의：80년대 이후 연암 문학 , 연구경향과 그 전망" 한국한문학회 11 : 53-57, 1988

10 강명관, "안쪽과 바깥쪽" 소명출판사 2007

11 최원식, "안자산 국학론 선집" 현대실학사 1996

12 이가원, "수여란필 (睡餘瀾筆)중에 개소된 (介紹) 연암 (燕巖)" 한국한문학회 1 : 85-94, 1976

13 강명관, "문체와 국가장치：정조의 문체반정을 둘러싼 사건들" 문학과 경계사 (가을) : 120-142, 2001

14 정해렴, "김태준 문학사론선집" 현대실학사 1997

15 미야지마 히로시, "근대를 다시 본다-동아시아의 관점에서" 창작과 비평 120 : 2004

16 고사카 시로, "근대라는 아포리아" 이학사 2007

17 민족문학사연구소, "근대계몽기의 학술·문예사상" 소명출판사 2000

18 강명관, "근대계몽기 출판운동과 그 역사적 의의" 민족문학사연구소 14 : 42-75, 1999

19 강명관, "국문학과 민족,그리고 근대" 소명출판사 2007

20 강명관, "燕巖 時代의 양명좌파 수용" 대동한문학회 23 : 83-107, 2005

21 강명관, "漢文廢止論과 愛國啓蒙期의 국·漢文論爭" 한국한문학회 8 : 195-252, 1985