RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인간의 경제적, 도덕적 그리고 종교적 차원 - 애덤 스미스의 경제학과 윤리학을 넘어 왕양명과 키에르케고어의 종교적 존재로 - = Human economic, moral and religious dimensions

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Adam Smith (1723-1790) found it efficient to pursue one's own interests within the scope of satisfying others' interests, and to rely more on mutual interests than to expect of others' benevolence. As such, human beings are physical beings with their souls, so they try to realize the desire and desire to maximize their selfishness, the physical desire of human beings. If understood from the philosophical point of view of Wang Yang-Ming (1472-1528), the human term means a complex of physical desires and souls, and the human term naturally flows in the direction of maximizing one's self-interest. In this regard, mainstream economics, which approaches at a realistic level, sees humans as basically selfish beings.
    The reason why human beings can be human is that they are not buried in reality but rather seek the values and meanings that life pursues. In this regard, human beings are both economically-looking and at the same time seeking moral life. Adam Smith explored the moral laws, or moral sensibilities, that occur in the mind when a human being enters into the nature and act of an asset to his neighbor or himself. Wang Yang-Ming's point of view is that if the human mind removes its immoral selfish passion and desire and acts according to the voice of the sheep within the human body, the human mind corresponds to the moral principle and reason. Wang Yang-Ming's moral principle refers to the moral feelings of humans that urge individuals to take actions that are beneficial to others' positions and remove desires for their own sake.
    Kierkegaard(1813-1855) argues that in order to understand the origin of the human mind or of the human soul, one must move on to the absolute, the source of the human soul. The originator of the human soul was not accessible by reason or sensibility, but only through the faith of man. Kierkegaard is divided into aesthetic, ethical and religious levels. And he saw that the path to restoring the fundamental nature of man becomes human through meeting with God in faith, which is the religious stage of man. Wang Yang-Ming stresses that men's physiological or selfish desires should be controlled and governed to prevent them from subdueing the reason and principle of heaven, where they are located in humans. If human nature is governed by nature, which is a true nature, human beings can express good morality like human beings, but if human beings do not recognize the nature of being one of nature, they can act against nature and act immorally.
    This paper tries to examine the complex and diverse strata of human beings by dividing the two philosophers into these three stages. In particular, we want to look at the lowest level of sensory (psychological) and self-interest at an economic level in order to understand the human nature of today. And besides the economic dimension, we will look at what cultural status human moral dimension has become in our society, and finally, why religious dimension is important in order to properly establish human moral culture.
    번역하기

    Adam Smith (1723-1790) found it efficient to pursue one's own interests within the scope of satisfying others' interests, and to rely more on mutual interests than to expect of others' benevolence. As such, human beings are physical beings with their ...

    Adam Smith (1723-1790) found it efficient to pursue one's own interests within the scope of satisfying others' interests, and to rely more on mutual interests than to expect of others' benevolence. As such, human beings are physical beings with their souls, so they try to realize the desire and desire to maximize their selfishness, the physical desire of human beings. If understood from the philosophical point of view of Wang Yang-Ming (1472-1528), the human term means a complex of physical desires and souls, and the human term naturally flows in the direction of maximizing one's self-interest. In this regard, mainstream economics, which approaches at a realistic level, sees humans as basically selfish beings.
    The reason why human beings can be human is that they are not buried in reality but rather seek the values and meanings that life pursues. In this regard, human beings are both economically-looking and at the same time seeking moral life. Adam Smith explored the moral laws, or moral sensibilities, that occur in the mind when a human being enters into the nature and act of an asset to his neighbor or himself. Wang Yang-Ming's point of view is that if the human mind removes its immoral selfish passion and desire and acts according to the voice of the sheep within the human body, the human mind corresponds to the moral principle and reason. Wang Yang-Ming's moral principle refers to the moral feelings of humans that urge individuals to take actions that are beneficial to others' positions and remove desires for their own sake.
    Kierkegaard(1813-1855) argues that in order to understand the origin of the human mind or of the human soul, one must move on to the absolute, the source of the human soul. The originator of the human soul was not accessible by reason or sensibility, but only through the faith of man. Kierkegaard is divided into aesthetic, ethical and religious levels. And he saw that the path to restoring the fundamental nature of man becomes human through meeting with God in faith, which is the religious stage of man. Wang Yang-Ming stresses that men's physiological or selfish desires should be controlled and governed to prevent them from subdueing the reason and principle of heaven, where they are located in humans. If human nature is governed by nature, which is a true nature, human beings can express good morality like human beings, but if human beings do not recognize the nature of being one of nature, they can act against nature and act immorally.
    This paper tries to examine the complex and diverse strata of human beings by dividing the two philosophers into these three stages. In particular, we want to look at the lowest level of sensory (psychological) and self-interest at an economic level in order to understand the human nature of today. And besides the economic dimension, we will look at what cultural status human moral dimension has become in our society, and finally, why religious dimension is important in order to properly establish human moral culture.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 닝크, C., "헤겔 정신현상학" 청하 1987

    2 황종환, "키에르케고어에서 인간의 본성과 윤리적 생활" 한국윤리교육학회 (35) : 485-501, 2014

    3 표재명, "키에르케고어 연구" 지성의 샘 1995

    4 김종두, "키에르케고르의 실존사상과 현대인의 자아이해" 앰-애드 2002

    5 이명곤, "키르케고르의 <이것이냐 저것이냐> 읽기" 세창미디어 2017

    6 이명곤, "키르케고르 읽기" 세창미디어 2014

    7 이영희, "칼 로저스의 인간중심 상담이론의 철학적 함의" 한국심리학회 6 (6): 1994

    8 오신택, "칼 로저스의 인간중심 상담에서 키에르케고어 철학의 수용" 한국해석학회 (36) : 159-183, 2015

    9 피터 B 라베, "철학상담의 이론과 실제" 시그마프레스 2010

    10 양선진, "지성중심의 사고를 넘어선 철학상담의 가능성 모색- 왕양명과 베르그손 사상의 유사성을 중심으로 -" 한국동서철학회 (85) : 267-290, 2017

    1 닝크, C., "헤겔 정신현상학" 청하 1987

    2 황종환, "키에르케고어에서 인간의 본성과 윤리적 생활" 한국윤리교육학회 (35) : 485-501, 2014

    3 표재명, "키에르케고어 연구" 지성의 샘 1995

    4 김종두, "키에르케고르의 실존사상과 현대인의 자아이해" 앰-애드 2002

    5 이명곤, "키르케고르의 <이것이냐 저것이냐> 읽기" 세창미디어 2017

    6 이명곤, "키르케고르 읽기" 세창미디어 2014

    7 이영희, "칼 로저스의 인간중심 상담이론의 철학적 함의" 한국심리학회 6 (6): 1994

    8 오신택, "칼 로저스의 인간중심 상담에서 키에르케고어 철학의 수용" 한국해석학회 (36) : 159-183, 2015

    9 피터 B 라베, "철학상담의 이론과 실제" 시그마프레스 2010

    10 양선진, "지성중심의 사고를 넘어선 철학상담의 가능성 모색- 왕양명과 베르그손 사상의 유사성을 중심으로 -" 한국동서철학회 (85) : 267-290, 2017

    11 쇠얀 키에르케고어, "죽음에 이르는 병" 치우 2001

    12 쇠얀 키에르케고어, "죽음에 이르는 병" 범우사 2002

    13 이근식, "존 스튜아트 밀의 진보적 자유주의" 기파랑 2006

    14 양선진, "정제두의 사상과 근대화" 한국학연구원 (74) : 169-191, 2019

    15 김세정, "왕양명의 생명철학" 청계 2006

    16 양선진, "왕양명의 생명존재론 - 왕양명의 자연과 생명에 대한 이해 -" 유학연구소 35 : 319-340, 2016

    17 Wight. J. B., "애덤 스미스 구하기" 생각의 나무 2003

    18 Acton, H. B., "시장의 도덕 및 관련 에세이들" 한국경제연구원 1996

    19 데카르트, "성찰 · 자연의 빛에 의한 진리탐구 · 프로그램에 대한 주석" 문예출판사 1997

    20 김세정, "생태계 위기와 儒家生態哲學의 발전 방향 - 서구 환경철학과의 비교를 중심으로 -" 대한철학회 85 : 87-114, 2003

    21 쇠얀 키에르케고어, "불안의 개념" 치우 2001

    22 쇠얀 키에르케고어, "불안의 개념" 한길사 1999

    23 Mankiw, G., "맨큐의 경제학" 2013

    24 김세정, "동양사상, 환경 ․ 생태 담론의 현주소와 미래" 동양사상연구원 14 : 2006

    25 Bentham, J., "도덕과 입법의 원리 서설" 나남 2011

    26 Smith, A., "도덕감정론" 비봉출판사 2009

    27 양선진, "네트워크 존재론의 시대" 영남퇴계학연구원 (23) : 459-490, 2018

    28 Calvin, J, "기독교 강요 상" 크리스챤다이제스트 2015

    29 김대식, "금융기관론 개정판 20판" 박영사 2015

    30 쇠얀 키에르케고어, "그리스도교의 훈련" 종로서적 1983

    31 Smith, A., "국부론" 비봉 2007

    32 Roll, E., "경제사상사" 까치 1982

    33 "王陽明全集"

    34 "朱子語類"

    35 "孟子"

    36 "傳習錄"

    37 "中庸"

    38 C. Adam, "OEuvres de Descartes, I-XII" 1983

    39 F. Alquié, "Descartes: OEuvres philophiques, I-III" 1983

    40 데카르트, "<성찰>에 대한 학자들의 반론과 데카르트의 답변, 1권" 나남 2013

    41 양선진, "21세기 한국 사회를 위한 배려와 공감을 위한 감성의 윤리학 모색" 한국양명학회 (41) : 309-335, 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.36 0.36 0.31
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.34 0.33 0.64 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼