과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 수업의 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론에서 나타나는 특징 = The Characteristics of Group and Classroom Discussions in Socioscientific Issues Classes

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this study, we investigated the argumentations of group and classroom discussions in socioscientific issues (SSI) discussion classes. Twenty-seven high school students participated in the SSI discussion classes on nuclear power generation. We observed and recorded the classes and also conducted semi-structured interviews. For the analyses, we revised a previous framework that was developed to analyze dialogic argumentations in the context of SSI. The analyses of the results indicated that there were more discourse schemes in the classroom discussions than the group discussions which are related to awareness and openness to multiple perspectives, evidence based reasoning, and on-going inquiry and skepticism. And there were few discourse schemes related to moral and ethical sensitivity in the group and classroom discussions. Various grounds, data, and information were presented in the classroom discussions. Students concentrated on carrying their claims and were not able to sympathize with and accept other opinions. Therefore, there were few discourse schemes to reach consensus. In addition, they perceived classroom discussions as competitive and actively rebutted other claims or grounds. The levels of argumentation were also high in the classroom discussions. The group discussions were held in relaxed atmosphere, and they asked the opponents more for clarification or additional information and evidences. However, classroom discussions were held in serious atmosphere, and they actively queried the validity of the claims or grounds. Based on the results, some suggestions to implement SSI discussion classes were discussed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권혁순, "협력적 비유 생성 활동에서 나타나는 비유의 변화 유형과 토론의 특징" 한국과학교육학회 37 (37): 407-416, 2017

2 박지영, "초등 예비교사의 사회 속의 과학 쟁점에 대한 논변에서 나타나는 소집단 상호작용 분석" 한국생물교육학회 39 (39): 653-673, 2011

3 이현주, "집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 523-534, 2014

4 이현주, "원자력 발전과 관련된 사회적 문제를 다룬 웹기반 수업에서 드러난 예비 과학교사들의 근거 활용 방식" 한국물리학회 62 (62): 364-373, 2012

5 고유정, "온라인 게시판과 스마트폰을 활용한 토론의 비교 분석" 안암교육학회 17 (17): 129-150, 2011

6 박지영, "사회 속 과학 쟁점에 대한 소집단 논변 상호작용 분석을 위한 방법론 고찰" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 604-624, 2012

7 양찬호, "물질의 입자성에 대한 모형 구성 과정에서 나타나는 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론의 특징" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 361-369, 2016

8 고흔석, "논쟁 중심 협동학습 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 사고 과정 연구" 한국사회과교육연구학회 48 (48): 57-73, 2009

9 이은항, "과학기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 교육 프로그램이 고등학생들의 도덕적 판단력과 SSI 추론 능력 함양에 미치는 영향" 학습자중심교과교육학회 16 (16): 219-237, 2016

10 남혜인, "과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 토론 수업에서 스마트 기기의 활용 방식과 수업의 특징" 한국과학교육학회 37 (37): 787-797, 2017

11 고연주, "과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 맥락에서의 소집단 논증활동 분석틀 개발: 담화클러스터와 담화요소의 분석" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 509-521, 2015

12 Albe, V., "When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect : Students’argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue" 38 (38): 67-90, 2008

13 Sadler, T. D., "What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?" 37 (37): 371-391, 2007

14 Millar, R., "Twenty first century science : Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science" 28 (28): 1499-1521, 2006

15 Zeidler, D. L., "The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education" Springer 7-38, 2003

16 Sadler, T. D., "The morality of socioscientific issues : Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas" 88 (88): 4-27, 2004

17 Zeidler, D. L., "Tangled up in views : Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas" 86 (86): 343-367, 2002

18 Patronis, T., "Students’ argumentation in decision making on a socio-scientific issue : Implications for teaching" 21 (21): 745-754, 1999

19 Sadler, T. D., "Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue" 26 (26): 387-409, 2004

20 Kolstø, S. D., "Scientific literacy for citizenship : Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues" 85 (85): 291-310, 2001

21 Oh, S., "Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving" 23 (23): 95-110, 2007

22 Halverson, K. L., "Lenses for framing decisions : Undergraduates’ decision making about stem cell research" 31 (31): 1249-1268, 2009

23 Chang, S., "Lakatos’ scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socio-scientific issues" 30 (30): 1753-1773, 2008

24 Zeidler, D. L., "It’s debatable! : Using socioscientific issues to develop scientific literacy" NSTA Press 2014

25 Evagorou, M., "Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue" 50 (50): 209-237, 2013

26 Kim, M., "Decision making through dialogue : A case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues" 44 (44): 903-926, 2014

27 Johnson, D. W., "Cooperative learning in social studies:A handbook for teachers" Addison-Wesley 306-331, 1994

28 Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education" 89 (89): 357-377, 2005

29 Clark, D. B., "Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality" 45 (45): 293-321, 2008

30 Erduran, S., "Argumentation in science education" Springer 47-69, 2007

31 Ministry of Education, "2015 revised national curriculum of science" Ministry of Education 2015