RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      漢代 中國的 世界秩序에 대한 制度史的 一考察  :  특히 「和親」體制를 中心으로 Especially focused on the "Ho-ch'in" System = A Study on the Chinese World Order in the Han Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2050850

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper was prepared as a part of effort to understand the structure and character of the "Ho-ch'in" (friendly relations) system as a part of the Chinese world order in the Han dynasty. Essentially the "Ho-ch'in" system had been existed for a horizontal relations which could be concluded between the two independent states, Han and its neighbor states. But the Systemic form of the "Ho-ch'in" in the Han dynasty was not all horizoutal one. Some Cases of the "Ho-ch'in" system were level both in nominally and virtually. But some other cases were unequal in form but equal in reality.
      If we could name the former the "Ho-ch'in I " system and the latter the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ"system, the "Ho-ch'in I" system includes those international relations, like as the relation between Han and Hsiung-nu in the early Han dynasty, "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ" system includes those interna-tional relations, like as the relation betweenn Han and Hsiung-nu in the late Hsi-Han dynasty, the relation between Han and Nan-yueh or Chao-hsien in the early Han dynasty, the relation between Han and Hsi-yu in the late Hsi-Han dynasty, etc.
      In this paper, I examined the systemic structure of the each cases and found out the common feature of the cases included in the "Ho-chin I" was systemized by those things, the forming brotherly ties, the marriage of the princess, the supply of the chinese goods, and the promise of the nonaggression, etc. And the relations of the "Ho-chin Ⅰ" was systemized by those forms of the Chao-kung(tribute), Te'e-feng(appointment), Ju-chin(security) and Ch'eng-chen(subjecting) etc.
      Especially the forms of the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ"were vertical and unequal one. In practice, the chinese in the Han dynasty had been regarded the states(or nations) included in the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ" system as the "Wai-ch'en"(outer subject) of Han China. But in reality, the relations between Han and the states in the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ" system was very equal and level one. I think this is an essential contradiction included in the chinese world order in the Han dynasty.
      번역하기

      This paper was prepared as a part of effort to understand the structure and character of the "Ho-ch'in" (friendly relations) system as a part of the Chinese world order in the Han dynasty. Essentially the "Ho-ch'in" system had been existed for a horiz...

      This paper was prepared as a part of effort to understand the structure and character of the "Ho-ch'in" (friendly relations) system as a part of the Chinese world order in the Han dynasty. Essentially the "Ho-ch'in" system had been existed for a horizontal relations which could be concluded between the two independent states, Han and its neighbor states. But the Systemic form of the "Ho-ch'in" in the Han dynasty was not all horizoutal one. Some Cases of the "Ho-ch'in" system were level both in nominally and virtually. But some other cases were unequal in form but equal in reality.
      If we could name the former the "Ho-ch'in I " system and the latter the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ"system, the "Ho-ch'in I" system includes those international relations, like as the relation between Han and Hsiung-nu in the early Han dynasty, "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ" system includes those interna-tional relations, like as the relation betweenn Han and Hsiung-nu in the late Hsi-Han dynasty, the relation between Han and Nan-yueh or Chao-hsien in the early Han dynasty, the relation between Han and Hsi-yu in the late Hsi-Han dynasty, etc.
      In this paper, I examined the systemic structure of the each cases and found out the common feature of the cases included in the "Ho-chin I" was systemized by those things, the forming brotherly ties, the marriage of the princess, the supply of the chinese goods, and the promise of the nonaggression, etc. And the relations of the "Ho-chin Ⅰ" was systemized by those forms of the Chao-kung(tribute), Te'e-feng(appointment), Ju-chin(security) and Ch'eng-chen(subjecting) etc.
      Especially the forms of the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ"were vertical and unequal one. In practice, the chinese in the Han dynasty had been regarded the states(or nations) included in the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ" system as the "Wai-ch'en"(outer subject) of Han China. But in reality, the relations between Han and the states in the "Ho-ch'in Ⅱ" system was very equal and level one. I think this is an essential contradiction included in the chinese world order in the Han dynasty.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 緖 言
      • Ⅱ. 西漢初 漢과 匈妨의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅰ]體制
      • Ⅲ. 西漢後期 漢과 匈妨의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅳ. 後漢代 漢과 北匈妨의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅴ. 漢과 南越의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅰ. 緖 言
      • Ⅱ. 西漢初 漢과 匈妨의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅰ]體制
      • Ⅲ. 西漢後期 漢과 匈妨의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅳ. 後漢代 漢과 北匈妨의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅴ. 漢과 南越의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅵ. 漢과 衛滿朝鮮의 關係를 통해서 본 [和親Ⅱ]體制
      • Ⅶ. 漢과 羌·鮮卑·爲孫등의 [和親]關係
      • Ⅷ. 漢과 西域諸國의 [和親]關係
      • Ⅸ. 結 言
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼