Prognostic Impact of Minimal Pleural Effusion in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

<P><B>Purpose</B></P><P>Minimal (< 10 mm thick) pleural effusion (PE) may represent an early phase of malignant PE, but its clinical relevance has rarely been studied. Therefore, we examined the proportion of minimal PE in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its impact on survival. We also considered possible accumulation mechanisms in our data set.</P><P><B>Patients and Methods</B></P><P>On the basis of PE status from chest computed tomography scans at diagnosis, 2,061 patients were classified into three groups: no PE, minimal PE, and malignant PE. Twenty-one variables associated with four factors—patient, stage migration, tumor, and treatment—were investigated for correlation with survival.</P><P><B>Results</B></P><P>Minimal PE presented in 272 patients (13.2%). Of 2,061 patients, the proportion of each stage was the following: 5.2% stage I, 10.9% stage II, 13.2% stage IIIA, 23.8% stage IIIB, and 13.9% stage IV. Minimal PE correlated significantly with shorter survival time than did no PE (median survival time, 7.7 <I>v</I> 17.7 months; log-rank <I>P</I> < .001), even after full adjustment with all variables (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.62). Prognostic impact of minimal PE was higher in early versus advanced stages (<I>P</I><SUB>interaction</SUB> = .001). In 237 patients (87.8%) with minimal PE, pleural invasion or attachment as a direct mechanism was observed, and it was an independent factor predicting worse survival (<I>P</I> = .03).</P><P><B>Conclusion</B></P><P>Minimal PE is a commonly encountered clinical concern in staging NSCLCs. Its presence is an important prognostic factor of worse survival, especially in early-stage disease.</P>