한국어판 Shoulder Pain And Disability Index의 신뢰도와 타당도 = Reliability and Validity of the Korean version of Shoulder Pain And Disability Index

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to establish reliability and validity of the Shoulder Pain And Disability Index(SPADI) translated into Korean for people with shoulder musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. Fifty-two subjects(22 males, 30 female) with shoulder musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction enrolled in the study. They completed a standardized, self-administered questionnaire that included the pain subscale 5 item and the function / disability subscale 8 items, in a total of 13assessment items. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha by internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating the SPADI scores to the NRS, DASH, ROM s cores. Test-retest
reliability of the translated versions of the SPADI was excellent ICC(2,1)=.991(95%CI .984 ~.995) and Cronbach’s alpha value for SPADI was found to be .942 and this was statistically significant (p < .01). The correlations between the SPADI and the criterion-related validity calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient were r =.946(p < .01) for NRS and r =.935(p < .01), for DASH and r =-.927(p < .01) for
ROM. We concluded that the Korean version SPADI was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of shoulder musculoskeletal pain and
dysfunction.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 Shoulder Pain And Disability Index(SPADI)를 한국어로 번안하여 평가-재평가간의 신뢰도 및 기준관련 타당도를 검증하는 것이다. 본 연구는 어깨의 근골격계 통증 및 기능장애가 있는 52명의 환자가 참가하였다. 통증 평가(pain subscale) 5문항과 장애 평가(function / disability subscale) 8문항 등 총 13개의 평가 항목을 자가보고형식의 설문지로 작성하였다. 신뢰도는 급간내 상관계수(ICC2,1)를 이용하였고, 내적 일치도는 크론바 알파 값을 이용하였다. NRS, DASH, ROM 점수의 결과를 상호 연관하여 기준관련 타당도를 검사하였다. 평가-재평가간 신뢰도는 .991로 높은 신뢰도를 나타내었으며, 내적 일치도는 크론바 알파 .942로 높게 나타났다. SPADI는 NRS(r =.946), DASH(r =.935), ROM(r =-.927) 점수와 p <.01 수준의 유의한 상관관계가 있었다. 한국어판 SPADI는 신뢰도와 다른기능을 평가하는 척도와 높은 타당도가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 한국어판 SPADI는 어깨의 근골격계 통증 및 기능장애 환자의 상태를 평가하기 위한 유용한 임상 도구이다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 2
• Ⅱ. 연구 방법 4
• Ⅲ. 연구 결과 7
• Ⅳ. 논의 10
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 12

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임재영, "한국어 DASH 설문지의 신뢰도, 타당성 및 반응성" 10 (10): 192-198, 2005

2 이관우, "하지의 근골격계 기능장애 환자들을 위한 한국어 판 Lower Extremity Functional Scale의 신뢰도와 타당도" 특수교육재활과학연구소 50 (50): 451-467, 2011

3 이은옥, "통증 -이론 및 중재-, 1판" 신광출판사 1993

4 김찬영, "만성 견비통에 대한 동씨침 치료의 무작위 대조군의 임상 연구" 대한침구의학회 24 (24): 89-96, 2007

5 양회송, "동결견 환자의 초음파치료 시 신장여부에 따른 관절가동범위 회복과 통증감소 효과 비교" 한국전문물리치료학회 10 (10): 129-137, 2003

6 안승헌, "뇌졸중 환자들을 위한 한국어판 Dynamic Gait Index의 신뢰도와 타당도" 특수교육재활과학연구소 50 (50): 289-306, 2011

7 이희윤, "견비통 환자에 대한 한방단독치료와 한·양방병행치료의 치료효과 비교 연구" 대한약침학회 11 (11): 97-110, 2008

8 Lopes, A. D., "Validity and reliability of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Brazil" 18 (18): 266-272, 2008

9 Orfale, A. G., "Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire" 38 (38): 293-302, 2005

10 Heald, S. L., "The shoulder pain and disability index: theconstruct validity and responsiveness of a region specific disability measure" 77 (77): 1079-1089, 1997

11 Jensen, M. P., "The measurement of clinical pain intensity. a comparison of six methods" 27 (27): 117-126, 1986

12 Atroshi, I., "The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire -Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients" 71 (71): 613-618, 2000

13 MacDermid, J. C., "The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity" 7 (7): 1-11, 2006

14 Martins, J., "The Brazilian version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-transration, cultural adaptation and reliability" 14 (14): 527-536, 2010

15 Green, S., "Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment and efficacy" 316 (316): 354-360, 1998

16 Downie, W. W., "Studies with pain rating scales" 37 (37): 378-381, 1978

17 Ruotolo, C., "Shoulder pain and the over hand athlete" 32 (32): 248-258, 2003

18 Jamnik, H., "Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: validation of Slovene version" 31 (31): 337-341, 2008

19 Bicer, A., "Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: a validation study in Turkish women" 51 (51): 865-870, 2010

20 Ferraz, M. B., "Reability of pain scale in the assessment of literaure and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis" 17 (17): 1022-1024, 1990

21 Nam Dong-woo, "Randomized Controlled Trial of East-West Collaborate Medical Treatment on Female Chronic Shoulder Pain Patients" 대한침구의학회 24 (24): 113-122, 2007

22 Dawson, J., "Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery" 78 (78): 593-600, 1996

23 Costa, L. O., "Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire" 32 (32): 1902-1907, 2007

24 Pope, D. P., "Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition" 56 (56): 308-312, 1997

25 Parsons, S., "Prevalence and comparative troublesomeness by age of musculoskeletal pain in different body locations" 24 (24): 308-316, 2007

26 Deyo, R. A., "Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain" 19 (19): 2032-2036, 1994

27 Testa, M. A., "Methods for quality-of-life studies" 15 : 535-559, 1994

28 Beaton, D. E., "Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the DASH outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity" 14 (14): 128-146, 2001

29 Beaton, D. E., "Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires" 78 (78): 882-890, 1996

30 Davis, A. M., "Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure" 12 (12): 269-274, 1999

31 Fries, J. F., "Measurements of patient outcome in arthritis" 23 (23): 137-145, 1980

32 Katz, J., "Measurement of pain" 79 (79): 231-252, 1999

33 Padua, R., "Italian Version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation" 28 (28): 179-186, 2003

34 Jiménez Buñuales, M. T., "International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)" 76 (76): 271-279, 2002

35 Bot, S. D., "Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice" 64 (64): 118-123, 2005

36 Streiner, D. L., "Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use, Second Edition" Oxford Medical Publications, Inc 1995

37 Beaton, D. E., "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures" 25 (25): 3186-3191, 2000

38 Pautex, S., "Feasibility and reliability of four pain self-assessment scales and correlation with an observational rating scale in hospitalized elderly demented patients" 60 (60): 524-529, 2005

39 Rosales, R. S., "Evaluation of the Spanish Version of the DASH and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Health-Related Quality-of -Life Instruments: Cross-cultural Adaptation Process and Reliability" 27 (27): 334-343, 2002

40 Michener, L. A., "Evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with shoulder pain: are we doing the best we can?" 27 (27): 491-505, 2008

41 Strax, T., "Evaluating pain and disability" 12 (12): 559-570, 2001

42 Hudak, P. L., "Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH(disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)" 29 (29): 602-608, 1996

43 Roach, K. E., "Development of a shoulder pain and disability index" 4 (4): 143-149, 1991

44 Bartolozzi, A., "Determinants of out-come in the treatment of rotator cuff disease" 308 : 90-97, 1994

45 Angst, F., "Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)" 46 (46): 87-92, 2007

46 Guillemin, F., "Cross-cultural adaptation of health-relatedquality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines" 46 (46): 1417-1432, 1993

47 Mawdsley, R. H., "Criterion-related validity of the figureof-eight method of measuring ankle edema" 30 (30): 149-153, 2000

48 Roddey, T. S., "Comparison of the University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and Simple shoulder test with shoulder pain and disability index: single administration reliability and validity" 80 (80): 759-768, 2000

49 Bot, S. D., "Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature" 63 (63): 335-341, 2004

50 Norman, G. R., "Biostatistics. The Bare Essentials, Volume 1. 1st edition" Mosby 2-260, 1994

51 Michener, L. A., "A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder" 14 (14): 68-76, 2001