세계화, 퇴직연금제도, 대기업 노사의 암묵적 이익연합

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper analyzes the structure of interests coalition between organized labor and big business over the design of retirement pension system in Korea under the increased impacts of globalization on national political economy. The Korean government finally left the choice between a defined-contribution plan(DB) and a defined-benefit plan(DC) on the voluntary decision based on bargaining between labor and employer at the firm level by introducing the Retirement Pension Law in 2005. This Law is the outcome of political compromise between big unions and big business despite adversarial conflicts between them in choosing either a DC or a DB. A DB can be beneficial for not only big unions but big business, who want to exploit their discretionary power of “the only fiduciary” as the pension plan sponsor. At the same time, although a DC is usually preferred by employers, it is not necessarily disadvantage for big unions under the decentralized union structure in that it can allow them to exercise their veto power in the process of bargaining with their employers at the firm levels. Therefore, for both big unions and big business, a critical issue is not the choice either a DC or a DB but the maintenance of their dominance in labor market and financial market respectively by incorporating their mutual interests into the new retirement pension system.
In this regard, the nature of the new retirement pension system can be understood by the logic of interests coalition between big unions and big business rather than that of interests conflict between them. As a consequence, it may have its negative effects on reforming corporate governance structures and decentralized industrial relations, and it will be more difficult for the government to avoid a path of neoliberal welfare policy driven by the idea of competition and exclusion under globalization.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 퇴직연금제도의 도입 배경
• Ⅲ. 퇴직연금제도 도입과 가시적 갈등구조
• Ⅳ. 암묵적 이익연합과 그 제도적 기반
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김원식, "퇴직연금제도의 문제점과 발전방향" 16 (16): 2005

2 류건식, "퇴직연금제도의 감독정책방안 연구" 13 : 2003

3 노사정위원회, "퇴직연금제도 논의자료" 노사정위원회 2003

4 이중기, "퇴직연금의 지배구조" 13 : 2003

5 "퇴직연금 정부입법안 비판과 대책" 2004

6 한국노동조합총연맹, "정부는 퇴직금제 폐지 등 근로기준법 개악음모를 중단하라" 한국노총 2001

7 "영세사업장 비정규 노동자 차별하는 퇴직연금제 반대한다" 2004

8 경총(한국경영자총협회), "연금제 정부입법안에 대한 경영계 입장" 한국경영자총협회 20039월

9 송원근, "연금 개혁과 연금자본주의의 위험" 아세아문제연구소 47 (47): 41-70, 2004

10 최원탁, "신자유주의적 재편과 연금체계의 변화: 한국에서 국민연금제도 변화의 함의" (3) : 2001

11 "사용자 편향적인 퇴직연금제 도입 반대한다" 2003

12 민주노총, "민주노총 정책워크숍 <퇴직연금의 문제와 산별퇴직연금 도입의 과제와 전망>" 2006

13 고광수, "기업연금제도의 현황과 과제" (283) : 2002

14 방하남, "기업연금제도 도입방안 연구 Ⅱ" 한국노동연구원 2002

15 방하남, "기업연금제도 도입방안 연구" 한국노동연구원 2001

16 "기업연금의 지배구조 네덜란드의 비교" (24) : 2005

17 김원식, "기업연금의 도입과 국민연금과의 관계설정" 2002

18 신기철, "기업연금 도입이 금융시장에 미치는 영향" (45) : 2003

19 이윤호, "금융의 재벌통제와 재벌의 금융지배" 2001

20 윤여협, "금융의 세계화 연기금의 금융화" (27) : 2002

21 "금융을 위한 연금 대 노령을 위한 연금" (86) : 2003

22 전국민주노동조합총연맹, "근로자퇴직연금제도 도입 비판과 대책" 민주노총 2003

23 노동부, "근로자퇴직급여보장법 주요내용" 노동부 2005

24 양재진, "경제위기, 정책망, 그리고 연금개혁 패러다임: 멕시코와 한국의 연금개혁 비교연구" 35 (35): 2001

25 김상조, "경제위기 이후 한국의 재벌개혁금융개혁의 현황과 과제" (121) : 2005

26 Jensen, "and the failure of internal control systems The Journal of Finance 48" 1993

27 Hall,, "Varieties of Capitalism" Oxford Univ Press 2001

28 Yang, Jae-jin, "The Rise of the Korean Welfare State amid Economic Crisis, 1997-99: Implication for the Globalization Debate" (18) : 2000

29 Mares,, "The Politics of Social Risk:Biusiness and Welfare State Development" Cambridge University Press 2003

30 Bonoli,, "The Politics of Pension Reform Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe" Cambridge Univ Press 2000

31 Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, "The Political Economy of Early Retirement" Routledge 2001

32 Myles, John, "The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform" Oxford Univ Press 2001

33 World Bank, "Republic of Korea The Korean Pension System at a Crossroads" World Bank (20404-KO) : 2000

34 Clark, "Pension Fund Capitalism" Oxford University Press 2000

35 Ebbinghaus,, "Introduction: Studying Varieties of Welfare Capitalism" Routledge 2001

36 Mishra, "Globalization and the Welfare State" Edward Elgar 1999

37 Rudra,, "Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries" 56 (56): 2002

38 Burgoon,Brian, "Globalization and Welfare Compensation:Disentangling the Ties That Bind" 55 (55): 2001

39 OECD, "Economic Survey of Korea" OECD 2002/2003

40 Soskice, David, "Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s" Cambridge University Press 1999

41 Krugman, "Development, Geography, and Economic Theory" MIT Press 1995

42 Huber, "Development and the Crisis of Welfare State Parties and Policies in the Global Market" Chicago University Press 2001

43 Kitschelt,, "Convergence and Divergence in Advanced Capitalist Democracies" Cambridge University Press 1999

44 Swenson, "Capitalists against Markets" Oxford University Press 2002

45 공정거래위원회, "2006년 대규모기업집단 소유지배구조에 대한 정보공개(7월)" 공정거래위원회 2006

46 국민연금발전위원회, "2003 국민연금 재정계산 및 제도개선방안" 국민연금발전위원회 2003