송와잡설(松窩雜說)의 서사적 재현과 이기(李墍)의 의식시계

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper attempts to interpret the view of the editor Lee Ki by analysing Songwajapseol.
Lee Ki was a member of Hansan Lee family. Lee Saek, Lee Gaerin, Lee Gaejon, and Lee Gae were the ancestors of Hansan Lee family, but they showed opposite attitudes in King Sejo’s usurpation of the crown. Lee Ki was agonized by those conflicting attitudes of the ancestors of Hansan Lee family. His internal conflict and search were reflected in Songwajapseol.
Lee Ki experienced power struggle between Parties and Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, which made him fall into deep despair. The feeling of hopelessness became the basis of the narrative representation of Songwajapseol. Lee Ki groped for four ways to overcome the despairing reality. First, heaccused and lampooned the problematic reality. Second, he searched for the ideal type of person. Third, he paid respect to the loyal subjects of the late Koryeo dynasty and the early Chosun dynasty. Fourth, he confirmed the way the destiny was realized and colored the world mysteriously.
Lee Ki captured the Chosun reality of the time by incorporating the narrative principle of contrast. But he looked for an alternative way to overcome the exclusion and collapse.
Lee ki emphasized and represented the paradoxical coexistence of Lee Saek and King Taejo, and Won Chonsuk and King Taejong. While Lee Ki criticized King Sejo’s usurpation of the crown and mourned the tragic end of King Danjon, he also excused Sin Sukjoo who turned against his friends and joined King Sejo’s rebellion. Lee Ki’s conflicting attitude was rooted in his hope to transcend the extreme dualism.
Lee Ki’s desire to transcend dualism was successfully accomplished in the representation of the Whanghi anecdotes. By stressing the fact that Whanghi was educated by the subjects of the fallen Koryeo dynasty, he emphasized Koryeo as an ideal past. This Ideal past became an alternative time which could overcome dualism and glorious past shedding light of hope for present despair.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 한산 이씨 가문사와 이기의 세계관
• 3. 『송와잡설』의 서사적 재현과 이기의 의식지향
• 4. 대조의 서술원리와 양변론의 극복
• 5. 결론
• 참고문헌
• ［Abstract］

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 패림,

2 김려, "한고관외사" 한국정신문화연구원 2002

3 이강옥, "조선시대 일화의 일탈" 서울대 국문학연구회 1997

4 이강옥, "조선시대 일화 연구" 태학사 1997

5 강주진, "이조당쟁사연구" 서울대 출판부 1971

6 영신아카데미 한국학연구소, "야사총서의 개별적 연구" 1978

7 심노숭, "대동패림" 국학자료원 1991

8 이덕일, "당쟁으로 보는 조선역사" 석필 1997

9 이기, "간옹우묵" 한국학중앙연구원 출판부 2010

10 "韓國歷代人物集成" 民昌文化社 1980

11 영신아카데미 한국학연구소, "野史叢書의 總體的 硏究" 1978

12 정만조, "16세기 사림파 관료의 붕당론" 국민대 한국학연구소 12 : 1989