RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    송덕수 교수의 “명의신탁된 부동산을 명의수탁자가 처분한 경우의 법률관계: 명의신탁 유형에 관한 논의를 포함하여”에 관한 평석 = Critical Analysis of Professor Tuck Soo Song’s Article “Rechtsverhältnisse bei Verfügung des Grundbuchtreuhänders über das Treuhandgut: einschliesslich des Eingehens auf die Formen der Grundbuchtreuhandschaft”

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107791822

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims at understanding Professor Tuck Soo Song’s academic performance, scholarly attitude and academic legacy left to academically younger generations by analyzing his article, “legal relations in the case of a nominal trustee disposing of trusted real estate: including studying various types of nominal trusts”, published by Ewha Law Journal vol 19 no. 1, in September 2014 so as to contribute to his retirement ceremonial publication of Ewha Law Journal. This paper shows how his world view or value permeates his article analyzed here, as it is more common in legal research works than any other social science, because legal research tends to be influenced by researchers’ world view or value view. This paper confirms that the analyzed article is an evidence that he has sought to interpret various provisions and legal tools in Korean civil code in accordance to whole codification system of the civil code as well as to their literal meaning. This paper evaluates as well that he sought to interpret nominal trusts of realties according to the law of expression of intention and its interpretation before the legislation of Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, whereas, since the mentions legislation, he has sought to interpret the Act faithfully to the literal meaning of the legal provisions. This paper makes much of it that his interpretation method and scholarly attitude importantly contribute to the consolidation of civil law lawyers’ theories. But this paper makes a point that, whereas he is of the generation who were academically trained and brought up during 1970s, new generations, who have faced radically changed points of social value view and complicated and complex conflicts of interest prevailing in the society since trend of globalization starting from 1995, need to reflect more serious whether his academic approach and interpretation method can apply to current society. From this perspective, this paper analyzed some cases which were dealt with in Professor Song’s article in depth.
    번역하기

    This paper aims at understanding Professor Tuck Soo Song’s academic performance, scholarly attitude and academic legacy left to academically younger generations by analyzing his article, “legal relations in the case of a nominal trustee disposing ...

    This paper aims at understanding Professor Tuck Soo Song’s academic performance, scholarly attitude and academic legacy left to academically younger generations by analyzing his article, “legal relations in the case of a nominal trustee disposing of trusted real estate: including studying various types of nominal trusts”, published by Ewha Law Journal vol 19 no. 1, in September 2014 so as to contribute to his retirement ceremonial publication of Ewha Law Journal. This paper shows how his world view or value permeates his article analyzed here, as it is more common in legal research works than any other social science, because legal research tends to be influenced by researchers’ world view or value view. This paper confirms that the analyzed article is an evidence that he has sought to interpret various provisions and legal tools in Korean civil code in accordance to whole codification system of the civil code as well as to their literal meaning. This paper evaluates as well that he sought to interpret nominal trusts of realties according to the law of expression of intention and its interpretation before the legislation of Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, whereas, since the mentions legislation, he has sought to interpret the Act faithfully to the literal meaning of the legal provisions. This paper makes much of it that his interpretation method and scholarly attitude importantly contribute to the consolidation of civil law lawyers’ theories. But this paper makes a point that, whereas he is of the generation who were academically trained and brought up during 1970s, new generations, who have faced radically changed points of social value view and complicated and complex conflicts of interest prevailing in the society since trend of globalization starting from 1995, need to reflect more serious whether his academic approach and interpretation method can apply to current society. From this perspective, this paper analyzed some cases which were dealt with in Professor Song’s article in depth.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 제철웅, "사학의 자율성과 공공성의 조화를 위한 모색 : 여당의 사학관련법 개정안을 중심으로" 법과사회이론학회 (27) : 445-475, 2004

    2 최경수, "부동산실명제와 앞으로의 정책과제" 국토연구원 (162) : 1995

    3 권오창, "부동산실명제시행에 따른 부동산 시장의 전망" 국토연구원 (166) : 1995

    4 조창현, "부동산실명제 실시현황과 추진방향" 국토연구원 (179) : 1996

    5 양창수, "부동산실명법의 사법적 규정에 의한 명의신탁의 규율-소위 계약명의신탁을 중심으로" 박영사 5 : 1999

    6 재정경제원, "부동산실명법 해설" 1995

    7 박동진, "부동산실명법 제4조에 의한 부동산 명의신탁의 효력" 한국법학원 32 (32): 1999

    8 곽윤직, "민법주해 5" 박영사 2009

    9 곽윤직, "민법주해 2" 박영사 1995

    10 제철웅, "미국의 특별수요신탁에 관한 일고찰" 법학연구소 32 (32): 153-175, 2016

    1 제철웅, "사학의 자율성과 공공성의 조화를 위한 모색 : 여당의 사학관련법 개정안을 중심으로" 법과사회이론학회 (27) : 445-475, 2004

    2 최경수, "부동산실명제와 앞으로의 정책과제" 국토연구원 (162) : 1995

    3 권오창, "부동산실명제시행에 따른 부동산 시장의 전망" 국토연구원 (166) : 1995

    4 조창현, "부동산실명제 실시현황과 추진방향" 국토연구원 (179) : 1996

    5 양창수, "부동산실명법의 사법적 규정에 의한 명의신탁의 규율-소위 계약명의신탁을 중심으로" 박영사 5 : 1999

    6 재정경제원, "부동산실명법 해설" 1995

    7 박동진, "부동산실명법 제4조에 의한 부동산 명의신탁의 효력" 한국법학원 32 (32): 1999

    8 곽윤직, "민법주해 5" 박영사 2009

    9 곽윤직, "민법주해 2" 박영사 1995

    10 제철웅, "미국의 특별수요신탁에 관한 일고찰" 법학연구소 32 (32): 153-175, 2016

    11 송덕수, "명의신탁된 부동산을 명의수탁자가 처분한 경우의 법률관계- 명의신탁의 유형에 관한 논의를 포함하여 -" 법학연구소 19 (19): 1-49, 2014

    12 이동진, "매도인 악의의 계약명의신탁과 명의수탁자의 부동산 처분에 대한 책임- 대법원 2013.9.12. 선고 2010다95185 판결 -" 한국재산법학회 34 (34): 279-304, 2018

    13 제철웅, "등기청구권과 침해부당이득: 새로운 법리의 형성과정에 관한 고찰" 한국민사법학회 93 : 281-323, 2020

    14 제철웅, "담보법" 율곡출판사 2017

    15 GRAHAM MOFFAT, "TRUSTS LAW 5" Cambridge Express 2009

    16 Larenz, "Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft" Springer 1995

    17 Larenz, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. II HalbBd 2" C.H. Beck 1994

    18 CHARLES GLENN, "FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE" Lemma BV 2002

    19 Volker Emmerich, "Das Recht der Leistungsstörungen" C.H. Beck 1997

    20 Honsell, "Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht: Zivilgesetzbuch II" Helbing & Lichtenhahn 2003

    21 송오식, "3자간 등기명의신탁과 불법원인급여 해당 여부- 대법원 전원합의체 2015다13850사건과 관련하여-" 한국재산법학회 36 (36): 55-83, 2019

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.81 0.81 0.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.68 0.998 0.2
    더보기

    연관 공개강의(KOCW)

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼