RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Ceftazidime의 임상적 연구  :  과립구 감소환자에서의 감염증에서 Piperacillin-Tobramycin 병합요법과의 비교연구 Ceftazidime or Piperacillin plus Tobramycin and the Possible Modifications Required for a Successful Outcome = Management of the Febrile Granulocytopenic Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40027725

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In a randomized, prospective study, ceftazidime monotherapy was compared with a combination of piperacillin and tobramycin for the treatment of infection in febrile granulocyto penic cancer patients. The subjects consisted of 40 patients with acute leukemia or solid tumor who developed fever and other signs of infections after induction chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. 21 patients were randomized to the piperacillin plus tobramycin combination, while 19 patients were allocated to ceftazidime monotherapy. Initial granulocyte count, duratation of granulocytopenia, infection days and granulocyte count on therapeutic responsewere all comparable in both treatment groups. On 72 hour assessment, success (with or with-out modification) rate according to NCI criteria was 100% in ceftazidime and 95% in combination group. Success according to EORTC criteria was 26% and 48% respectively. On posttreatment assessment, success rate according to MCI criteria was 91% in ceftazidime group and 70% in combination group, while one according to EORTC was 33% and 40% respectively. There was no statistical significance between the two success rates.
      The superinfection was more commonly seen in the combination group, esp. by resistant E. coli, even though the difference was not significant.

      번역하기

      In a randomized, prospective study, ceftazidime monotherapy was compared with a combination of piperacillin and tobramycin for the treatment of infection in febrile granulocyto penic cancer patients. The subjects consisted of 40 patients with acute le...

      In a randomized, prospective study, ceftazidime monotherapy was compared with a combination of piperacillin and tobramycin for the treatment of infection in febrile granulocyto penic cancer patients. The subjects consisted of 40 patients with acute leukemia or solid tumor who developed fever and other signs of infections after induction chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. 21 patients were randomized to the piperacillin plus tobramycin combination, while 19 patients were allocated to ceftazidime monotherapy. Initial granulocyte count, duratation of granulocytopenia, infection days and granulocyte count on therapeutic responsewere all comparable in both treatment groups. On 72 hour assessment, success (with or with-out modification) rate according to NCI criteria was 100% in ceftazidime and 95% in combination group. Success according to EORTC criteria was 26% and 48% respectively. On posttreatment assessment, success rate according to MCI criteria was 91% in ceftazidime group and 70% in combination group, while one according to EORTC was 33% and 40% respectively. There was no statistical significance between the two success rates.
      The superinfection was more commonly seen in the combination group, esp. by resistant E. coli, even though the difference was not significant.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼